Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About the "No President since FDR has won re-election with UE above 7.2%" meme....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 09:05 PM
Original message
About the "No President since FDR has won re-election with UE above 7.2%" meme....

No President since FDR, until Obama, had inherited an economy in freefall due to failed Republican deregulation policies either.


Yes... Unemployment will likely be over 7.2% when voters go to the polls next year.


But just like FDR, Obama will win re-election easily.


The American people were here in 2008... they saw what happened.... they saw the American economy collapse before their eyes. Just like in 1929.


They know who was in charge when it happened. They know who is responsible for it happening.


Just as in 1936.... they will vote to keep the Democratic President in office for four more years.


Today's Gallup tracking: Approve 53%, Disapprove 39%. The widest margin for Obama since the early months of his presidency.

The public gets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Truman won his turn outright even though the economy was
not in good shape. Unemployment was relatively high due to the economy transitioning from a war-time to peace-time economy.

The do-nothing Republican Congress was thrown out as their deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wouldn't be so cocky..
.... they also know who hasn't done JACK SHIT for main street.

While I agree that the Repugs would do no better, the voting public has a history of punishing the president/party in power during hard times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. In every area, things are better today than they were on January 20, 2009

Are they good enough? Not by a long shot.


But we were losing 700,000 jobs a month when Obama took office... and we're gaining 200,000 jobs a month now.


The direction of things matters.


In every measurable way, things are better than they were..... not good enough, but better than they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. IF the people get to hear about it, but of course the M$M will keep reminding them
of how bad it is "under Obama," without reminding them that it was worse under Bush, and that it takes a while to turn a disaster like that around.

Don't forget, most Americans are not even aware that they have been getting a tax cut under Obama. They think he has repeatedly raised taxes on the middle class, because that is what they keep hearing from the propaganda-masters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Unemployment is up.
Unemployment was 7.6% in Jan. 2009. It is 9% now. Yes, it is the direction of things that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Only 40,000 Jobs Last Month. Double Dip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. You.
..... are dreaming, truly, turn off the MSM and do some research. Things are NOT better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. can you please back that statement up, it sounds like you are the one with the MSM meme

From what I can see every measurable indicator has improved, if only slightly.

If you look at the auto industry specifically, and it's implications for this country, then things are dramatically better.

The same can be said for the stock market.



Things like housing have not improved much but it took a decade or more of irresponsible behavior to create that bubble, expecting it to be solved in a couple of years isn't reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Err...housing prices? Forclosures, # underwater mortgages...
Deficit? #wars we are in?
Keep your rose colored glasses on. Must be nice to have a secure job, paid off house and full medical insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. No President since FDR was left a depression by his predecessor.
I think that might make a little difference. That, and a few things like the refusal of Republicans to consider any candidates without either character disorders or prominent delusional systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. For that matter since 1776
no president had been Black until 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rec
But I'd caveat it

A poor republikan field helps

But, most of those jobs being filled are being filled by people in the under 34 age range and older than 55. link:
http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/flowchart/2011/04/01/why-the-middle-aged-are-missing-out-on-new-jobs

Those in their late 30's-early 50's are still finding it difficult to find work and many have given up at this point. If they vote, they may decide they want something else - especially if they lost their job between late 2009 and now.

Many businesses now won't hire people who are unemplyed.

The unemployment numbers are always a double edged sword. It's great when you see the numbers fall but the question is always why. If they are falling because these people are all being hired 'great'
If it's because people are over the 99-weeks, not-so-much.

In the end, Obama should win. But at the same point Carter should have won, Bush I should have won.
We'll see whether the republicans find the not-crazy to run. At this point that position seems to only be filled by former Utah Gov and Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman.
His problems: 1. He's Mormon (fundies don't like them) 2. He's not an arch-conservative 3. He took the position in China under Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. yeah, and not one democrat has won re-election in the 21st century.
for a more complete list of relevant factors, check out lichtman's 13 keys.

http://www.gazette.net/stories/05272011/policol193154_32542.php

obama's got, oh, about 10 of them, making him practically a shoe-in.

NOTE that lichtman's 13 keys theory is historically tested and has held up since first formulated.

NOTE also that unemployment per se is NOT even a single one of the factors. unemployment may lead to other relevant factors (significant social unrest, a serious nomination challenge, a serious third party candidate) or be the result of other relevant factors (poor short-term or long-term economy) but unemployment by itself, in isolation, is not relevant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. Republican are betting everything on that -- their goal is to keep job-growth down till election

May well send economy in long-term stagnation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. We can't take anything for granted.
True, Obama inherited a mess from Bush, but 4 years is a long time to turn things around.

I remember when George HW Bush had huge approval ratings in 1991 after Desert Storm. And the Democratic field was fairly unimpressive. The small-state southern Governor with a reputation for philandering was not seen as a terribly strong candidate. But his people came up with the phrase "it's the economy, stupid" and we know how the story ended.

It *is* the economy, stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
16. I like being represented by a President who has Class
as well as many other things I like about President O. Its how we're perceived by the rest of the world that is important too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaeScott Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
17. Push back on this every time you see/hear this meme. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. You vastly over estimate the American public's ability to pay attention
for extended periods of time. They were there in 2008, but it doesn't matter who caused it. The only thing that matters is that Obama hasn't fixed it. When it comes to unemployment and the economy, the American public doesn't take the long view. For better or worse, they will inevitably blame the person in charge for the current situation.

I'm not saying Obama won't win, but he has a helluva tough sell to make on the economy. That is what the repukes will latch onto and will be what the election is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC