Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, did Gaddafi use cluster bombs or were those ours?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:14 PM
Original message
So, did Gaddafi use cluster bombs or were those ours?
Edited on Mon May-30-11 02:15 PM by EFerrari
This blogger puts together a case for investigating the claims that these munitions were used by Gaddafi.


The cluster bombing of Misrata: The case against the USA
Posted on May 25, 2011 by HRI Mark

The ongoing HRI investigation of the cluster bombing of Misrata in April 2011 has found convincing evidence the bombing was committed by US naval forces.

The bombing of Misrata

On the 15th April 2011, during the day, sub-munitions of a MAT-120 cluster bomb were shown to Human Rights Watch (HRW) and C.J. Chivers, a journalist for the New York Times, in Misrata. On that evening, during ongoing clashes between rebel and loyalist forces, Human Rights Watch workers witnessed 3 or 4 cluster munitions landing in residential areas of Misrata. HRW attest to further subsequent such bombings.

Civilians were killed in these attacks and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, condemned:

“The reported repeated use of cluster munitions and heavy weaponry by Libyan government forces in their attempt to regain control of the besieged city of Misrata.”

http://humanrightsinvestigations.org/2011/05/25/the-cluster-bombing-of-misrata-the-case-against-the-usa/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. and where were they made?
haven't had a chance to read the whole thing..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwrguy Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Spain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The claim was that they were sold to Libya by Spain
but this article shows that that claim seems to be a misreading of the documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwrguy Donating Member (396 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. US doesn't use the MAT-120
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The US doesn't do war crimes/other atrocities nor other international no-nos
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Apparently, we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. Uhm, no we dont.
The MAT-120 and the M120 are two different (yet similar) systems of different manufacture and country of origin.

Though, yes you did find a cache of a page about the M120. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M120_mortar

Good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
48. Black ops deliberately DO NOT use the munitions "usually" used by regular forces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. You've seen this on TV I presume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
73. Well... if that's not impeachable evidence, I don't know what is.
Well... if that's not impeachable evidence, I don't know what is. :eyes"

"It's not the stuff we use, so it must have been us..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Human Rights Watch - the real one
Libya: Cluster Munitions Strike Misrata
Human Rights Watch Witnesses Attack Into Residential Area
April 15, 2011

It's appalling that Libya is using this weapon, especially in a residential area. They pose a huge risk to civilians, both during attacks because of their indiscriminate nature and afterward because of the still-dangerous unexploded duds scattered about.

Steve Goose, arms division director at Human Rights Watch

(New York) - Government forces loyal to the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, have fired cluster munitions into residential areas in the western city of Misrata, posing a grave risk to civilians, Human Rights Watch said today.

Human Rights Watch observed at least three cluster munitions explode over the el-Shawahda neighborhood in Misrata on the night of April 14, 2011. Researchers inspected the remnants of a cluster submunition and interviewed witnesses to two other apparent cluster munition strikes.

Based on the submunition inspected by Human Rights Watch, first discovered by a reporter from The New York Times, the cluster munition is a Spanish-produced MAT-120 120mm mortar projectile, which opens in mid-air and releases 21 submunitions over a wide area. Upon exploding on contact with an object, each submunition disintegrates into high-velocity fragments to attack people and releases a slug of molten metal to penetrate armored vehicles.

http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2011/04/15/libya-cluster-munitions-strike-misrata


Please note - NATO sorties occur at night (there was a rare day excursion in the last few days). If witnesses watched the cluster bombs fall it could only have been from Gaddafi forces during the day.


Please send your report to C.J. Chivers and ask him to critique it. I would love to read his response, as he is one of the more credible journalists and knows his stuff.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. CJ Chivers is one of the most hawkish reporters on this story
and the blogger made no claim to be HRW.

But, that's a good suggestion. I think I will put the question to Chivers on Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's idiotic
the only conceivable reason why the US would cluster-bomb civilians in Misrata and then blame Gadhafi is to impugn Gadhafi's reputation and make a case for an escalation of the war. There has been no escalation, nor any inclination toward escalation, and Gadhafi has no reputation to impugn that I am aware of, except as a murderous dictator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. How is going from enforcing a no fly zone to bombing Tripoli
not an escalation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. If you read the UN resolution, its a little broader that no-fly
Which involves, first, targeting anti-aircraft and radar facilities, and the command-and-control centers that coordinate those facilities.

In any case, if you are predisposed to think that Gadhafi is fine and NATO is wrong, it doesn't matter what the resolution said or how NATO has enforced it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. So, are you saying there has been no escalation or that the UN resolution
allows for escalation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. It doesn't seem like there is any escalation
and the activity and intent of NATO seems no different than it was on the first day of action. The US is more on the sidelines than at first, but that's also in keeping with what Obama promised, as far as the limits of our involvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. CIA has been on the ground since the early days of the demonstrations.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/africa/31intel.html

This action was sold to us as a no fly zone enforcement that would take days.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/libya-crisis-obama-moammar-gadhafi-ultimatum/story?id=13164938

But I suppose if you are pre-disposed to rationalize any escalation, there has been no escalation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. The CIA are always there - thats a given
As far as daily missions, dedicated hardware, people involved, etc, there's probably less now than in the first few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. On what are you basing that conclusion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. On what are you basing the question? The OP is idiotic.
I suspect you respond to every statement with some question or some unrelated comment that requires answer, and that kicks the thread up again. "Good numbers" might be the goal, as in maximizing pages views, but nevertheless its an idiotic OP. The US didn't cluster bomb Misrata.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #36
49. Did you bother to read the OP? I don't think so.
But thanks for the kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
39. Someone completely OBLIVIOUS to the facts -- All key supplies in Tripoli has been bombed
All normal commercial and civic activity is at a standstill. The society has been destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's not start splitting hairs... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. We know from the start that the cluster bombs came from NATO, the USA, or Israel
Edited on Mon May-30-11 02:55 PM by PufPuf23
regardless of who used the weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I don't think I follow you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Else where in this thread, Spain (NATO) was identified as the source of the cluster bombs.
Cluster bombs are manufactured and used or provided by the Western allies.

Qaddafi joined "WOT" post 9-11 and had access to western arms.

What instance do you know where cluster bombers were used except by NATO, USA, or Israel except where the munitions have been provided as military aid to "allies" or former "allies".

The "foes" do not even tend to have the delivery systems operative much less the cluster bomb munitions.

Then NATO and the USA do not use IEDs or suicide bombers.

We have similar sensitivities about many topics EF. Best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. you're missing the point.
Cluster bombs are illegal under international law. If the US is making cluster bombs and selling them to other countries, then the US is guilty of a war crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. I know that cluster bombs are illegal under international law.
So is white phosphorus.

The fact is that cluster bombs are manufactured and used by Western nations and, even when used by "foes", they have been obtained through NATO and other USA allies or former allies.

I would rather this not be true.

Post 2003, France and Italy were the biggest arms dealers to Gadaffi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #27
43. These bombs were sold before Spain ratified the CCM
Spain destroyed their stockpiles and stopped selling them. Libya has not ratified the CCM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #27
44. Certain types of cluster bombs are legal under the CCM
The treaty allows certain types of weapons with submunitions that do not have the indiscriminate area effects or pose the same unexploded ordnance risks as cluster munitions. Permitted weapons must contain less than ten submunitions, and each must weigh more than 4 kilograms (8.8 lb), and each submunition must have the capability to detect and engage a single target object and contain electronic self-destruct and self-deactivation mechanisms.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Cluster_Munitions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Thanks. Just wanted to make sure I understood
what you were saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
41. We know from the start that the WAR IS A RACKET. The whole intervention is based on deception
so why not cluster bomb story is also a lie.

All the antecedents re use of cluster weapons point back to the good old USA -- either used by, planted by, supplied by ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'd give the blogger's conjecture more weight if s/he wasn't anonymous.
Identifying who is doing the investigating and writing is a start toward finding out if someone's stated agenda lines up with their actual agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. You have a point. On the other hand
it reduces us to just looking at the case presented.

The weapons stuff makes my eyes glaze over so I was hoping someone here could speak to those specifics. Also, HRW politicized Libya in the American press weeks before the cluster bomb story and that made me uncomfortable when they came out so strongly on this story. That and Al Jazeera's adopting of the rebel's flag as their story graphic. It hasn't been easy to decipher what is going on without feeling massively handled.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
40. He(she) may like having a life and livelihood (job). One dares not openly say
what is obvious to many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. I have to go and attend to family for a while.
If anyone can shed some light, pro or con, that would be appreciated. I'll check back in later this evening. Thanx.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. Not convincing. Entirely circumstantial.
The claim the author is going at is that US Special Forces fired them from small boats and without any proof.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. All the claims were just that -- except initially to rationalize ruthlessly killing pro-Gov forces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
46. No, see it's crystal clear.
The Finnish and Sweedish Navy have a boat that has a weapon system on it that can fire that specific round.

The US Navy bought a few of those boats (though no evidence that they bought the optional gun turret for them)

In an interview a Navy SPECWAR guy said the weapon system was pretty neat. Therefore it is crystal clear obvious that the was the actions of the US Navy.

I mean, what more proof do you need then that?!

:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. Those cluster bombs got there somehow
and there's no evidence Gaddafi bought them. Of the two countries, the US is the one with the most recent track record of using those weapons, in Yemen. It's not like Obama hasn't used them before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
58. But America has never used a 120mm mortar cluster munition
120mm mortars are short range weapons - just how the hell did US forces get close enough to fire Spanish mortar shells in Libya? And why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. It has been reported already that CIA was on the ground
since the early days of the demmonstrations, if not from the very beginning. Do you know who was there with them or what equipment they had?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. 120mm mortars are big and heavy
not your standard spook gear. The Libyan army, on the other hand, has plenty of 120mm mortars.

"When you hear hoof beats, think horses not zebras."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. I'll take that as a "no". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. I know as much as you do, the difference being
Edited on Tue May-31-11 02:07 PM by hack89
my ignorance acts as a brake on uninformed speculation.

You have no evidence that the US fired those shells. There is plenty of evidence that the army not only has plenty 120mm mortars but is enthusiastically trying to kill civilians. Do you have any reason to believe that they would not use their mortars to kill civilians? And if that is the case, why does the CIA have to execute a false flag operation - there is plenty of evidence of atrocities already. And why cluster bombs - we aren't going to condemn their use since we use them liberally so how does such an incident help the US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. 120mm mortars are not man portable
The tubes alone weigh hundreds of pounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Why would they have to be?
Wasn't Gaddafi our friend until he wasn't? Didn't we have access until very recently? Do you think CIA looked at the demonstrations and suddenly decided to go to Libya with their backpacks?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. Gaddafi's upper brass are bailing on him. There are job openings there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. +100000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. And how does that relate to the OP? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. you're embarrassing yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I take your criticism for what it's worth.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
37. Once a "Presidential Finding" is approved for an operation any hope of separating truth from lies
goes out the window.

In Libya, the principal operations are "black ops" -- information and military. So the average person
will never know what is really happening unless the company and special forces make a big blunder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
42. They were Qaddafi's
Edited on Tue May-31-11 07:32 AM by hack89
we don't use MAT-120 120mm mortar cluster munitions. Libya is known to have purchased them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #42
47. Apparently the Libya "purchase" story cannot be confirmed -- seems invented
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. The entire story is invented
considering the US does not use MAT-120 shells nor do we fire mortars from small boats. Have you considered that Libya bought the shells on the black market? I think it more likely that Spain did in fact sell the shells to Libya - it makes more sense than the nonsense suggested in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #42
52. Nope and nope. I linked up thread to a weapons manufacturer
that sells them to us and you've read what it says about the Spanish claim in the OP, I assume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. You confused M120 with MAT-120
not the same.

these are the mortar rounds the US uses:

* M929 Smoke Cartridge
* XM930 Illumination Round
* XM930E1 Illumination Round
* XM931 Practice Round
* M933 High Explosive Round
* M934 High Explosive Round
* M934A1 High Explosive Round
* XM983 Illumination Round
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. What were the cluster bombs we used in Yemen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. I don't know - we have a wide selection to choose from
but we don't use MAT-120 shells - why is that so hard to accept?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. I don't need to accept it. I need to find out if it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Let me know when you have it figured out. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. I have emails out to people who know more about weapons than I do
(which is pretty much nothing at all). If I hear back, I will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. It was BLU-97 from a Tomahawk missile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Distant Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Why would covert OPS deliberately defeat their goal by using weapons that would give

the gig away. This is just ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Why wouldn't they use a shell known to be used by Libya?
Why would covert OPS deliberately defeat their goal by using weapons that would give the gig away? This is just ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
45. If the story is true about the cluster bombs
I would rather thank that they came from us but during one of the years a bush was in the white house. Probably about the same time as the contra's were being armed by the reagon/bush goons, North, Negroponte, those traitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #45
50. A lot of those people are still around.
Negroponte is one of Hillary's advisors on Latin America, for example. Too bad we don't empty and fumigate the State Department and the Pentagon after every election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #50
69. negroponte is a piece of work
shoulda' been jailed years ago. He introduces the Iraqi to the battery powered electric drill torture that they were finding bodies with evidence of shortly after bushco sent him over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. And he was given the power to issue FCC waivers under Shrub.
A real piece of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC