Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wisconsin: Walker's got a new scheme - homeowners can pay to power factories.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:39 AM
Original message
Wisconsin: Walker's got a new scheme - homeowners can pay to power factories.
http://www.jsonline.com/business/122813603.html

<snip>

A bill to provide special discounts for manufacturers on their power rates is raising questions about whether small businesses and homeowners would have to pay more so that certain factories can pay less.

The bill would expand a pilot program to offer a discount of up to $5 million over five years to Mercury Marine, the final piece of a more than $120 million state-and-local financing package that helped the engine maker decide not to move to Oklahoma.

"When Wisconsin competes with other states for jobs, the fight is not whether those jobs will be created, but rather where those jobs will be located," said Scott Smith, Alliant director of regulatory affairs.

"When the discount is used for job retention, we have determined that a typical discount will help our existing customers avoid the larger negative rate impacts that would occur if the customer left Wisconsin," Smith said.

<end snip>


Looks like more legalized extortion to me. Now grandma can foot the electric bill for large factories so their international owners can reap higher profits. Dare to fight back and it'll cost you your jobs.


Please do whatever you can to help with the recall of Republicans in Wisconsin, and elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. My town "lets" us pay higher water prices for a company that closed!
We got higher water bill rates to "make up" for the income that was lost when a company fled the county.

And I was told I was the only person who had called to complain about having to subsidize a non-existent business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm happy to subsidize that company that chooses to stay here if
they agree to give stock to the employees proportional to the profit they share with their out of state stockholders.

If states want large corporations to locate in their state then there needs to be a trade-off that ties the corporation incrementally more over time to the state.

It shouldn't be as easy for the corporation to move as just saying "Oh, we found cheaper labor somewhere else. Bye."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HelenWheels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. They don't need to be subsidized
Mercury Marine (MM) closed up shop for a while and when they reopened they dropped the wages to $10/hour. That's only $.50/hour more than my granddaughter makes for an office job she just started. And they used to pay good wages.I guess they could threaten to move to a southern state if they want to lower the wages even more.

Good idea about the stock but workers need money in their pockets. Instead of subsidizing, all businesses should have to pay, and pay good, when they pick up and move to another area. They are black-mailing the American public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. The last I knew... companies already receive subsidies from electric companies
in the form of lower utility rates than homeowners. Why the hell does the government need to subsidize that?

And I'm wondering if the logic is right about there being an additional energy cost to homeowners if a major company moves out. Wouldn't it really mean that the consumers would be paying less because they are not subsidizing that company anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rick Scott wants to do the same thing here in Florida.
Of course, we know all that it is purely coincidental for all these wingnuts governors and legislatures to be proposing exactly the same legislation all over the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC