Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Too posh to push? C-sections rise with social status

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 04:32 PM
Original message
Too posh to push? C-sections rise with social status

About a third of U.S. pregnancies end with a C-section, and in Britain, a quarter of babies make their entrance this way. And yet the World Health Organization says C-sections should happen in no more than 5 percent to 15 percent of all deliveries.

So what's up? Researchers looked at 20 years of information on Scottish babies born via C-sections and the social class of their mothers - 365,000 women in all. Some have dubbed this finding “Too Posh to Push,” but others don’t feel that’s the case.

Dr. Shari Lawson, obstetrician with Johns Hopkins Bayview Hospital, says the link between social class and rates of C-sections raises questions that the study doesn’t address. She suggests, “It might be that women who are from more affluent areas might also have more education and they’re asking their doctors more pointed questions that make an elective C-section the right thing for a particular patient.”

Anyone who has ever recovered from a C-section, or knows a woman who has, clearly understands that major abdominal surgery is not a quick and easy way to opt out of the risks involved in pregnancy and labor. Other reasons for more elective C-sections may include more women facing complications caused by advanced maternal age, obesity or high blood pressure.

http://sacramento.momslikeme.com/members/journalactions.aspx?g=190562&m=17350966
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not sure this is true. Better educated women are often those who
want a more natural childbirth experience. Of course, if the woman has lots of money and just doesn't care whether the C section is slightly more dangerous, might NOT be deterred because she can get the best medical care.

This may be a class issue in the U.K. NOt sure here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess I'm just a peasant then
because I had all three of my kids at home -- in 1972, 1977 and 1985.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mariana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Those women are mostly wealthier and/or have better insurance.
C-sections generate large fees, I imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Roughly 3 times as much $$ after 54 hours of labor and no baby my body shut down
it was then later discovered that I had a muscular dystrophy... there are times when they are necessary. Thankfully I did have great insurance and yes I am educated, but I did not want a C Section.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-11 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. they sure do.. and of course a scheduled C-section
makes a planned birth more possible. Rich people may have schedules that need to be kept to :)

Perhaps doctors are preferring sections too because they can schedule their time better too , and if the pregnancy is in any way high risk, they probably don't want any surprises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC