Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why We Need to Rein In Government Contractors That Use Taxpayer Money for Political Advantage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:50 PM
Original message
Why We Need to Rein In Government Contractors That Use Taxpayer Money for Political Advantage
Why We Need to Rein In Government Contractors That Use Taxpayer Money for Political Advantage Robert Reich

President Obama is mulling an executive order to force big government contractors to disclose details of their political spending. Big businesses are already telling their political patrons in Congress to oppose it – and the pressure is building.

The President should issue the executive order immediately. And he should go even further – banning all political activity by companies receiving more than half their revenues from the U.S. government.

Lockheed Martin, the nation’s largest contractor, has already got more than $19 billion in federal contracts so far this year. But we know very little about Lockheed Martin’s political spending other than its Political Action Committee contributions. We don’t know how much money it gives to the Aerospace Industries Association to lobby for a bigger defense budget.

(more at link)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mr. Jefferson Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. What you are suggesting would be unconstitutional.
Do you believe that government workers should be prohibited from engaging in political activity as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, do you?
and why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Jefferson Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Absolutely not.
Edited on Fri May-20-11 04:38 PM by Mr. Jefferson
Freedom of speech applies to the other guys too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Do you see that this is an article by Robert Reich?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Where's the link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC