Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Veterans Groups Clash with VA over PTSD Diagnosis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 08:05 AM
Original message
Veterans Groups Clash with VA over PTSD Diagnosis
Veterans Groups Clash with VA over PTSD Diagnosis

At the same time that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) made it easier for soldiers to file a post-traumatic stress disorder claim, the agency also made it more difficult to receive such a diagnosis, prompting veterans groups to sue the government over the latter change.

Earlier this year, the VA decided veterans no longer needed to provide witnesses to substantiate a claim of PTSD. This move was heralded by veterans’ organizations. But then it was learned that the agency adopted another new rule that states PTSD diagnoses must come from VA doctors, not private physicians.

“Before this change, if you had a competent examination from a private examiner a competent exam from a VA examiner, the benefit of the doubt would go to the veteran,” Richard Cohen, executive director at the National Organization of Veterans Advocates (NOVA), told Military.com. “With the new regulation they could say they don’t have to look at a private examiner now because they have one done by a VA examiner. And the preponderance of evidence then is against the claim.”

NOVA, along with the Paralyzed Veterans of America and Veterans of Modern Warfare, are suing the VA, arguing that the agency has offered no proof that only their doctors are best qualified to diagnosis PTSD.

PTSD claims have soared since the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, going from 120,000 in 1999 to more than 345,000 in 2008.

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/Veterans_Groups_Clash_with_VA_over_PTSD_Diagnosis_110103
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zephie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. They view our injured vets as "damaged goods"
if they aren't fit to go back out there to get shot at again, why spend the money, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's not a fair characterization of the VA mental health programs
To suggest care decisions are based on returning soldiers to active duty is is baseless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. well...that should make the claims go down,as there's already a backlog.
See- they are really supporting the troops...much less PTSD reported.It is "Plus good"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The VA follows funding restrictions set by Congress
Before broad-brushing the VA it would be good to have in hand some investigation on how this stupid rule came into existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. considering I have belonged to VFP,VFCS,and MFSO for 6 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yes, I have questions...
What is the actual wording the rule?

Who wrote the rule requiring VA mental health diagnosis of PTSD?

When was the rule written?

What circumstances led to recognition of the need for a new rule?

Was the rule mandated by Congress or a consequence of Administration decisions?

What, if any, rationale has been given for the rule change?

What difference, if any, is there between the medical credentialing requirements for providers in the community and at a VA clinic?

What difference, if any, is there between VA PTSD diagnostic rates and other competent civilian mental health diagnosticians?

Is there any evidence that PTSD assessment at by VA clinicians is prejudiced for non-diagnosis or that the severity of VA PTSD diagnoses are biased for high global function (low impact on ADLs)?

Is the central issue veterans access to treatment of PTSD or veteran's compensation for severe PTSD?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. IMO, the entire PTSD benefit situation needs to be revamped.
Right now the government pretty much just throws money at vets with PTSD to compensate them for lost wages. That's certainly important, but OFTEN leads to family members and friends taking horrible advantage of vets with the disorder (I actually knew a guy who would occasionally check into the hospital just to get away from the people mooching off of him). There are programs to help vets actually cope with PTSD, but the intensive help most of these vets need is few and far between. I personally think the government's investments should include expanding these services, rather than just paying people off. Most of the people I have encountered with PTSD would much rather get back to some sort of a productive life than cash a monthly check, but live in a nightmare. A more service-based approach would also cut down on the number of people filing false claims (and believe me, they do exist), which is what I presume the VA is getting at with these new restrictions regarding diagnosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. do you realize how much it kills a soldier/vet to admit they have PTSD
Edited on Mon Jan-03-11 09:49 AM by w8liftinglady
I know firsthand.

Trust me,many would rather die...they just pick different ways to make it happen.

My dad had severe PTSD after 8 years in VietNam.
My kid has it.
The women and men I counsel on the streets have it.
None of them are milking the system.
The military only recently began recognizing PTSD as anything but a "Pussy grunt" (per my son)
Prior to that,there was ridicule and retaliation if a troop tried to get help,if a female troop reported rape,and massive drugging of our troops to shut them the f*ck up(not good for morale,you know)
Yeah-ptsd treatment in an outpatient base sponsored by veterans is the way to go,peer-guided support groups.It happened when Shinseki took over.Things are far from perfect.People still have no clue there are 2 million veterans of this war...not counting Gulf War One,Viet Nam,Bosnia,Korea.No one talks about it...except on Veterans Day-when they wave their little flags.No mention on TV.There is a backlog even getting into the VA system,unless they are holding a knife to their wrist.It shouldn't be that way.
There continues to be talks of funding cuts.
Now,comments like yours make these kids second-guess themselves yet again.
We can be polite and quiet,waiting for things to happen.
Or...we can try to make a change for these poor men and women who gave all..just to get screwed by their country when they came home.
End of rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Um yeah, I do.
But I fail to see how my suggestion that money alone is not the answer is in any way critical of vets suffering from PTSD. The military would like to pay to make this go away. I think that does people suffering from the disorder a great disservice. Compensation certainly should be a component of any PTSD package, but therapeutic resources, both inpatient and outpatient therapy (and FYI, most of my patients have said that their inpatient treatments were most beneficial to them) needs to be expanded, as does research into PTSD and TBI. This is an issue that I am seriously considering devoting my career to, so please don't insinuate that I don't care about vets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC