Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now this will drive the wingnuts bonkers: Navy will perform same sex marriages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 04:36 PM
Original message
Now this will drive the wingnuts bonkers: Navy will perform same sex marriages
Navy Will Perform Same-Sex Marriages

— By Adam Weinstein
| Mon May. 9, 2011 12:29 PM PDT
blmurch/Flickr Commons

The military establishment, it appears, is willing to drag congressional Republicans kicking and screaming into the post-Don't Ask, Don't Tell era. The US Navy has authorized its chaplains to perform same-sex marriages on military bases in states that legally recognize such unions. That news came in a memo from the service's head chaplain (PDF), dated April 13:

Consistent with the tenets of his or her religious organization, a chaplain may officiate a same-sex, civil marriage: if it is conducted in accordance with a state that permits same-sex marriage or union; and if that chaplain is, according to the applicable state and local laws, otherwise fully certified to officiate that state’s marriages...if the base is located in a state where same-sex marriage is legal, then base facilities may normally be used to celebrate the marriage. This is true for purely religious services (e.g., a chaplain blessing a union) or a traditional wedding (e.g., a chaplain both blessing and conducting the ceremony).

The policy's unlikely to have a significant impact on gay or military communities: There's no naval base, for example, in Iowa, one of five states (along with the District of Columbia) that recognize same-sex marriages. And until the DADT repeal is certified by the Pentagon, no service members are likely to be hitching up at the Washington Navy Yard. Not only that, chaplains who disagree with gay marriage on theological grounds are under no obligation to perform the ceremonies, which shrinks the pool of willing wedding officiators to virtually nil.


But there's symbolic power in the policy change—enough to get a rise out of social conservatives. "This new guidance from the Navy clearly violates the law," said Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) who serves on the House Armed Services Committee and has no problem citing chapter and verse of the Defense of Marriage Act, even as he stumbles over the Pledge of Allegiance and says the Thanksgiving pilgrims fought "unbiblical" socialism. "While our president may not like this law, it is unbelievable that our Navy would issue guidance that clearly violates this law. While a state may legalize same-sex marriage, federal property and federal employees, like Navy chaplains, should not be used to perform marriages that are not recognized by federal law."

<snip>

http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/05/navy-will-perform-same-sex-marriage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. It always seemed to me that Navy folks had the most level heads of all the military people.
Thats probably not 100% true but thats my experience with people I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That mirrors my experience as well. Retired Navy here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Recommend!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. can't stop smiling
:) it's wonderful and the right thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. OMG! It's the end of the world!!11!!!
k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Awesome.
It's great to know there is a thing or two headed in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyPragmatist Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I dont know if this is really true, but the Navy has the reputation
of being the branch of the military with the most homosexuals. I've never seen any actual statistics, but the Navy is often presented as having a large amount of gays (I guess just compared to the other branches).

Does anyone know if this is actually true?

And if so, any thoughts on why this is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well - I believe gay men have had a tendency to move major port cities anyway.
I boil that down to 'escape'.

The same w/ the navy - as far away from home as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Hello Sailor...

Wherever would you get a notion like that?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. I don't know if its true.. or just specualation/ titualation about men out at
sea for months without women around... However, these days, women are actually allowed on naval vessles... Remember when that was a controversy.. allowing women to be out at sea with all those roudy men... for months on end...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Sub duty is still male only, though I think they did do trials on it.
My gay brother had some stories to tell when he was stationed on a sub, I can tell you that much. Obviously one persons opinion can't be taken as fact, and I did some digging for statistics, but they appear to hard to find, if they're out there at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Women will soon be serving on Submarines.
The Navy has already announced it and has trained a few for duty already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. In the navy


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Support Our Troops Baby !!!! Support Our Troops!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. Seems like the Navy is and has been a bit more gay-friendly than, say,
the AIR FORCE.

And my own dad was a career USAF officer decades ago, so I get to criticize them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Woot! Wish I could hit the recommend button a hundred times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. Why it will drive them nuts: now their rent boys will start pestering them to tie the knot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
16. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm guessing
that there aren't a lot of Unitarian or UCC ministers in the services. They seem to attract Catholics and evangelicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC