Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dalai Lama suggests bin Laden's death was justified -'Forgiveness doesn't mean forget what happened'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:33 PM
Original message
Dalai Lama suggests bin Laden's death was justified -'Forgiveness doesn't mean forget what happened'
Dalai Lama suggests Osama bin Laden's death was justified

Speaking at USC, the Buddhist spiritual leader says of the Al Qaeda chief's assassination: 'Forgiveness doesn't mean forget what happened.'

Sept. 11, 2001 By Mitchell Landsberg, Los Angeles Times

May 4, 2011


The Dalai Lama spoke to a crowd of about 3,000 students at USC's Galen Center on Tuesday. Wednesday he is scheduled to accept an award in Long Beach and speak at UC Irvine. (Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Times)

As the leader of Tibetan Buddhism, the 14th Dalai Lama says he practices compassion to such an extent that he tries to avoid swatting mosquitoes "when my mood is good and there is no danger of malaria," sometimes watching with interest as they swell with his blood.

Yet, in an appearance Tuesday at USC, he appeared to suggest that the United States was justified in killing Osama bin Laden.

As a human being, Bin Laden may have deserved compassion and even forgiveness, the Dalai Lama said in answer to a question about the assassination of the Al Qaeda leader. But, he said, "Forgiveness doesn't mean forget what happened. … If something is serious and it is necessary to take counter-measures, you have to take counter-measures."

<SNIP>

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-0504-dalai-lama-20110504,0,7229481.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. wow...
this helps my inner conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Too bad it's false and you'll continue to have to grapple with your own moral conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. With all due respect to the Dalai Lama
He's wrong.

If Bin Laden was unarmed, I feel that an attempt should have been made to capture him and place him on trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. He did not suggest that or imply it in any way. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. No he did not. That is the reporter's own fantasy.
Edited on Wed May-04-11 07:38 PM by Luminous Animal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you, Dalai Lama.
Good sense from a very benevolent man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Except he didn't. He answered two distinct questions among many questions.
There is zero evidence presented in ANY newspaper article of from the Dalai Lama's own website that these two questions (and issues) were linked.

One question dealt specifically with Osama.
Then later, another question dealt with the Dalai Lama's own ethical failure.

Though, there is probably no sense in trying to disabuse you of this fantasy, I'll post this anyway in hopes that others appreciate the truth.

http://www.dalailama.com/news/post/672-his-holiness-talks-about-secular-ethics-and-human-development-at-university-of-southern-california

"His Holiness then answered questions, some of which were submitted through the Internet. The first question was on His Holiness’ emphasis on compassion as a basis of ethics. It asked whether in some situation ensuring justice is more important than being compassionate to the perpetrator of a crime. It referred to the news of the death of Osama Bin Laden and the celebrations of it by some, and asked where compassion fit in with this and ethics. In his response, His Holiness emphasized the need to find a distinction between the action and the actor. He said in the case of Bin Laden, his action was of course destructive and the September 11 events killed thousands of people. So his action must be brought to justice, His Holiness said. But with the actor we must have compassion and a sense of concern, he added. His Holiness said therefore the counter measure, no matter what form it takes, has to be compassionate action. His Holiness referred to the basis of the practice of forgiveness saying that it, however, did not mean that one should forget what has been done.

His Holiness then answered a few other questions, including one relating to how a student should approach the issue of holding on to one’s principles while facing the reality of having to repay student loans and earn a living working for corporations whose principles did not complement his thinking. Here His Holiness said he wanted to quote the Buddha’s teaching that you are your own master and said the student should judge. To a question on whether His Holiness could think of any unethical acts that he had committed, His Holiness responded in the positive referring to “my relation with mosquitoes,” much to the amusement of the audience. His Holiness expanded saying if there was no risk of malaria then he would tolerate a mosquito or two sucking blood from his arm but when they come one after another, he would lose his patience."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Now that sounds more like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Thank you. This lie is being blasted around the world and not one reporter
took the time to find out what was actually said. Not one. And it appears nobody contacted the Dalai Lama himself for clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I think you're wrong.
Edited on Wed May-04-11 08:06 PM by jefferson_dem
He was answering a specific question about bin Laden.

Here's the wire report:

"The first question was on His Holiness' emphasis on compassion as a basis of ethics. It asked whether in some situation ensuring justice is more important than being compassionate to the perpetrator of a crime," it said.

"It referred to the news of the death of Osama bin Laden and the celebrations of it by some, and asked where compassion fit in with this and ethics.

In response he "emphasized the need to find a distinction between the action and the actor. He said in the case of bin Laden, his action was of course destructive and the September 11 events killed thousands of people.

"So his action must be brought to justice... But with the actor we must have compassion and a sense of concern... His Holiness said therefore the counter measure, no matter what form it takes, has to be compassionate action."

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iA-sagU5ibaB8_R2gsRuwSgS3FbQ?docId=CNG.c4e5aaec1a6b9ae498dbebf05c7cebdc.12f1


And the excerpt from HH's website, which you reference above:

His Holiness then answered questions, some of which were submitted through the Internet. The first question was on His Holiness’ emphasis on compassion as a basis of ethics. It asked whether in some situation ensuring justice is more important than being compassionate to the perpetrator of a crime. It referred to the news of the death of Osama Bin Laden and the celebrations of it by some, and asked where compassion fit in with this and ethics. In his response, His Holiness emphasized the need to find a distinction between the action and the actor. He said in the case of Bin Laden, his action was of course destructive and the September 11 events killed thousands of people. So his action must be brought to justice, His Holiness said. But with the actor we must have compassion and a sense of concern, he added. His Holiness said therefore the counter measure, no matter what form it takes, has to be compassionate action. His Holiness referred to the basis of the practice of forgiveness saying that it, however, did not mean that one should forget what has been done.

http://www.dalailama.com/news/post/672-his-holiness-talks-about-secular-ethics-and-human-development-at-university-of-southern-california


Perhaps you're challenging the interpretation of "justice"; that HH's reference to "justice" did not mean he was, in fact, endorsing the killing of bin Laden but rather some broader interpretation. Sorry...that's not what I get from reading the field reports of what was actually said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I gave you the narrative from the Dalai Lama's own website recapping the event up thread.
The Osama answer was specific to Osama.

The mosquito answer was specific to the Dalai Lama's own ethical failings.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=439&topic_id=1038594&mesg_id=1038823

"His Holiness then answered questions, some of which were submitted through the Internet. The first question was on His Holiness’ emphasis on compassion as a basis of ethics. It asked whether in some situation ensuring justice is more important than being compassionate to the perpetrator of a crime. It referred to the news of the death of Osama Bin Laden and the celebrations of it by some, and asked where compassion fit in with this and ethics. In his response, His Holiness emphasized the need to find a distinction between the action and the actor. He said in the case of Bin Laden, his action was of course destructive and the September 11 events killed thousands of people. So his action must be brought to justice, His Holiness said. But with the actor we must have compassion and a sense of concern, he added. His Holiness said therefore the counter measure, no matter what form it takes, has to be compassionate action. His Holiness referred to the basis of the practice of forgiveness saying that it, however, did not mean that one should forget what has been done.

His Holiness then answered a few other questions, including one relating to how a student should approach the issue of holding on to one’s principles while facing the reality of having to repay student loans and earn a living working for corporations whose principles did not complement his thinking. Here His Holiness said he wanted to quote the Buddha’s teaching that you are your own master and said the student should judge. To a question on whether His Holiness could think of any unethical acts that he had committed, His Holiness responded in the positive referring to “my relation with mosquitoes,” much to the amusement of the audience. His Holiness expanded saying if there was no risk of malaria then he would tolerate a mosquito or two sucking blood from his arm but when they come one after another, he would lose his patience."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. The question included a distinct reference to the death of bin Laden.
HH indicated that "his action must be brought to justice" and that we should not "forget what has been done." To me, that sounds like tacit acknowledgement that what happened in Abbottabad was justified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. None of those suggest or imply that he should have been shot. How are you even making this argument?
From his website he clearly states this:

"So his action must be brought to justice, His Holiness said. But with the actor we must have compassion and a sense of concern, he added. His Holiness said therefore the counter measure, no matter what form it takes, has to be compassionate action. His Holiness referred to the basis of the practice of forgiveness saying that it, however, did not mean that one should forget what has been done."

Are you really going to try to convince me that shooting Osama in the head is a compassionate action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. And you've actually proved my point. How can violently blowing a giant hole in a person's head
ever in any sense be construed as compassionate action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. The Dalai frickin Lama???
YES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Did not happen which I illustrated several times over on this thread.
If people would read beyond they OP, they might learn something. I always wondered why some people posted the same information over and over and over again in the same thread (and run the risk of being ridiculed) ... now I know why.

He was answering questions and the question about Osama and the question about the Dalai Lama's own ethical lapses were entirely different questions and answers. Linking the two is the reporters own fantasy.

From the Dalai Lama's own website:

http://www.dalailama.com/news/post/672-his-holiness-talks-about-secular-ethics-and-human-development-at-university-of-southern-california

"His Holiness then answered questions, some of which were submitted through the Internet. The first question was on His Holiness’ emphasis on compassion as a basis of ethics. It asked whether in some situation ensuring justice is more important than being compassionate to the perpetrator of a crime. It referred to the news of the death of Osama Bin Laden and the celebrations of it by some, and asked where compassion fit in with this and ethics. In his response, His Holiness emphasized the need to find a distinction between the action and the actor. He said in the case of Bin Laden, his action was of course destructive and the September 11 events killed thousands of people. So his action must be brought to justice, His Holiness said. But with the actor we must have compassion and a sense of concern, he added. His Holiness said therefore the counter measure, no matter what form it takes, has to be compassionate action. His Holiness referred to the basis of the practice of forgiveness saying that it, however, did not mean that one should forget what has been done.

His Holiness then answered a few other questions, including one relating to how a student should approach the issue of holding on to one’s principles while facing the reality of having to repay student loans and earn a living working for corporations whose principles did not complement his thinking. Here His Holiness said he wanted to quote the Buddha’s teaching that you are your own master and said the student should judge. To a question on whether His Holiness could think of any unethical acts that he had committed, His Holiness responded in the positive referring to “my relation with mosquitoes,” much to the amusement of the audience. His Holiness expanded saying if there was no risk of malaria then he would tolerate a mosquito or two sucking blood from his arm but when they come one after another, he would lose his patience."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. It did happen...
even according to the cut/pastes from the naysayers. The only debatable point is over interpretations of "justice", according the Dalai Lama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I posted two consecutive paragraphs directly from the Dalai Lama's website. You quoted a reporter.
The reporter clearly tries to link the Dalai Lama's remarks about Osama with his remarks about mosquitoes.

They are not linked and no matter how much you try you cannot make it so.

Once again...

http://www.dalailama.com/news/post/672-his-holiness-talks-about-secular-ethics-and-human-development-at-university-of-southern-california

"His Holiness then answered questions, some of which were submitted through the Internet. The first question was on His Holiness’ emphasis on compassion as a basis of ethics. It asked whether in some situation ensuring justice is more important than being compassionate to the perpetrator of a crime. It referred to the news of the death of Osama Bin Laden and the celebrations of it by some, and asked where compassion fit in with this and ethics. In his response, His Holiness emphasized the need to find a distinction between the action and the actor. He said in the case of Bin Laden, his action was of course destructive and the September 11 events killed thousands of people. So his action must be brought to justice, His Holiness said. But with the actor we must have compassion and a sense of concern, he added. His Holiness said therefore the counter measure, no matter what form it takes, has to be compassionate action. His Holiness referred to the basis of the practice of forgiveness saying that it, however, did not mean that one should forget what has been done.

His Holiness then answered a few other questions, including one relating to how a student should approach the issue of holding on to one’s principles while facing the reality of having to repay student loans and earn a living working for corporations whose principles did not complement his thinking. Here His Holiness said he wanted to quote the Buddha’s teaching that you are your own master and said the student should judge. To a question on whether His Holiness could think of any unethical acts that he had committed, His Holiness responded in the positive referring to “my relation with mosquitoes,” much to the amusement of the audience. His Holiness expanded saying if there was no risk of malaria then he would tolerate a mosquito or two sucking blood from his arm but when they come one after another, he would lose his patience."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Not only that, he is nnot "the Buddhist spiritual leader" he is one of many n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. If you read the comments from your linked article, you would know that people who were THERE
disagree with you, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Memory doesn't mean kill them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC