Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deregulation guts mid sized corporations and leaves only a few

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 05:12 PM
Original message
Deregulation guts mid sized corporations and leaves only a few
huge corporations and a whole lot of smaller business in an industry. Once this has taken place there will be no upward mobility for business. The huge guys will dominate. The small businesses will carve out small markets for themselves. But never the twain shall meet (unless a small business in one industry gets swallowed up by a big guy). It is why there was a financial bailout of big banks. Right now is America's chance to dominate world financial markets. If Obama/bush had let the big american banks fail there would have been no way American banks could then dominate world financial markets. The world is integrating right now. Deregulation is well on its way to being done and there will be little upward mobility for smaller banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. We saw this happen with California's energy corporations
Now it's just PG&E(vil) raising rates again and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep, I've heard that before someplace that it had more to
do with huge American banks being enabled to dominate world financial markets. You wrote a good short synopsis of it all. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. or upward mobility for 'smaller' folks, that is, most of us,
who depend on competition in markets to enable us to survive.

Regulation is necessary, for markets and individuals to survive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And allowing corporations to exist is a regulation to increase upward mobility for people with a
little bit of money or someone with a good idea to get money. But will we see the GOP try and do away with those laws? Nope. The legality of unions are regulations too by the way, that help upward mobility for the worker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Absolutely. I could not agree more.
We cannot stand by idly while powerful economic engines -- virtually unregulated corporations -- violate workers' rights, human rights, and the environment, sweeping aside antitrust laws, eliminating competition.

We need a new relationship between our government and corporate America, an arms-length relationship, so that our elected leaders are capable of independently affirming and safeguarding the public interest. Just as our founders understood the need for separation of church and state, we need to institutionalize the separation of corporations and the state. This begins with government taking the responsibility to establish the conditions under which corporations can do business in the United States, including the establishment of a federal corporate charter that describes and clearly delineates corporate rights and responsibilities.

Corporations must be compelled to pay a fair share of taxes. If corporations shift profits offshore to avoid paying taxes, they should not be permitted to operate in the United States. The decrease in corporate tax responsibility is an indication of the rise of corporate power. Corporations pay three and half times less in taxes now than they did in the 1950s. Working families have to make up the difference.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3204894
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. You just now figured that out
You forgot to mention the mergers were funded through the looting of Private Pension funds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC