Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Wall Street and the Toxic Philosophy of Ayn Rand Are Destroying Our Retirements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
upstatecajun Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 11:29 AM
Original message
How Wall Street and the Toxic Philosophy of Ayn Rand Are Destroying Our Retirements
It’s tough growing old. And it’s even tougher growing old in America -- unless you’re rich.


It used to be that you could count on two pensions – social security and a pension from your employer. But now work-related pensions are an endangered species and Social Security is under assault from a lethal combination of Wall Street’s insatiable greed and the pernicious philosophy of Ayn Rand.

For much of the post-WWII period, private sector workers could count on decent, defined benefit pension funds that paid a fixed monthly amount for as long as you lived. Most also included options that allowed your spouse to receive benefits for the rest of his or her life after you died. You felt like you could survive into your golden years and provide for your loved ones.

Defined benefit plans are much more secure than 401(k)s, which end when the money runs out. The odds are that you will quickly outlive your 401(k). In fact, the average 401(k) has a balance of only $45,519, and 46 percent of all 401(k)s are worth less than $10,000.

http://www.alternet.org/economy/150820/how_wall_street_and_the_toxic_philosophy_of_ayn_rand_are_destroying_our_retirements/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyberswede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. $1 million
A financial counselor told me that my spouse and I would need our 401Ks to be $1 million *each* in order for us to retire comfortably. Oh - and she assumes both of us will retire around age 70 or 72 (which will be the retirement age when we finally get there).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC