Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Question that needs to be asked...Why did Bush Cultivate Pakistan as an Ally?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:17 AM
Original message
The Question that needs to be asked...Why did Bush Cultivate Pakistan as an Ally?
Everyone else was evil in that area, but he courted Pakistan. Why? My answer--because he knkew they could protect Bin Laden, the man Bush DIDN'T want to capture.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/04/world/asia/04binladen.html?hpw

WASHINGTON — Tensions between the American and Pakistani governments intensified sharply on Tuesday as senior Obama administration officials demanded answers to how Osama bin Laden managed to hide in Pakistan, and the Pakistani government issued a defiant statement calling the raid that killed the Al Qaeda leader “an unauthorized unilateral action.”

John O. Brennan, the top White House counterterrorism adviser, said there were many questions about how the sprawling compound “was able to be there for so many years with Bin Laden resident there and it didn’t come to the attention of the local authorities.”

“We need to understand what sort of support network that Bin Laden might have had in place,” Mr. Brennan said during an interview with ABC on Tuesday.

The suspicions have intensified efforts by some members of Congress to scale back American aid to Pakistan, or cut it entirely, as lawmakers described Pakistan as a duplicitous ally undeserving of the billions of dollars it receives each year from Washington.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because Pakistan has nukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. So does India...
and for some reason a country that had a brutal dictator was not part of the Axis of Evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Capturing or killing him would have put the Iraqi
oil grab in danger. Obama was smart about not sharing intelligence. Now, if we could only get our nukes back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. There must have been money in it somewhere for the Bush family
Edited on Wed May-04-11 10:23 AM by Atman
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. We would have to eliminate about 1/2 of our allies if we
dump all of those who are duplicitous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Musharraf had a long relationship with BFEE, before Bush took office in 2001. BCCI facilitated
Edited on Wed May-04-11 10:24 AM by blm
Pakistan's ability to get nukes (AQ Khan-BFEE). And we should all know by now that what BCCI was doing for decades in funding and nurturing global terrorism was exactly what Poppy Bush and his global fascist elite wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. The administration is going to open a can of worms by pursuing this
Not that it would be a bad thing.

Your point is well taken, I don't think cheney and his minions really want anybody digging around in Pakistan to find out why Osama was allowed to hide there in plain sight for six years.

I expect a big outcry from their media puppets as the realization begins to sink in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Probably for the same misguided reasons Osama was cultivated
as a ally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Misguided? I think I can sum up the reason succinctly...
Oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. There is no oil in Afghanistan and that is where we propped up
Osama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. No, but there's oil in that whole area of the world, and that's why
we seek people who can help us strategically...and wasn't some pipeline destined to go through there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I believe so. It was more for the coraling the Russians is my take
on it. Not far from China either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Musharraf gave a very plainspoken answer to Jon Stewart on this very point. (VIDEO)
About how and why Pakistan joined the U.S. "War on Terror". Now, I imagine you have some preconceived notions about what he said so I'd direct you to listen to him for yourself by watching the video HERE. From 2:45-5:00 minutes (although it's interesting if you continue watching passed that mark) is the information I'm speaking about.

While I don't necessarily trust Musharraf on other issues, I think you'll see his account of how he was approached by the U.S. and especially his openness about saying things might have swung the other way (if it was in Pakistan's national interests) are pretty candid.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. War is $$$$ and OBL alive justified the war. Lip-service-wise. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. Pakistan was our ally long before Bush became president.
If you go back many years when Pakistan broke away from India you will understand our love/hate relationship. At one time India was very friendly with Russia so we sided with Pakistan. Now Pakistan has nuclear weapons so we cannot afford to see the government fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. remember reading that General Mahmoud (sp) from
Pakistan allegedly wired money to one of the 9/11 terrorists, Atta? And it was the ISI who found Daniel Pearl's body. Did Daniel know something was going down? Then, I believe * forgave Pakistan's debt.

And, after 9/11, I also believed that military surgical strikes were more effective, rather than starting high casualty,money draining wars. Of course, I don't believe that was Little Boot's agenda, getting OBL.
Rachel Maddow's show last night was very enlightening. However, after 9/11 there was some of OBL's writing, and the one thing that caught me was that the man was a good rich capitalist and knew a lot about business and the stock market. His goal was to bring our country down financially--it's there in his writings. Our intelligence had to know his grand scheme, so why did the * administration buy into it? Little Boots did exactly what OBL schemed, funneling money to private contractors, billions to Iraq--our money flying out of the treasury as fast as they could drain it--creating more security agencies while privatizing even some of our intelligence--doing all of it while eroding the constitution and the bill of rights, all in the name of protecting the citizenry. We already had a great government security mechanism in place--it was not our security, it was those at the top who did not heed the warnings. The August PDB report, the FBI (Coleen Rowley), they were the canaries in the coal mine, and yet, the top seemed to not heed the warnings.

The well being of our citizenry, the safety of our infrastructure, and our economic stability ARE SECURITY ISSUES. If we are going to be afraid of every bogeyman, or follow the corporate MSM telling us who we have to fear today, then our country will continue to shovel money to stop Emanuel while further enriching those who have profited so well while bankrupting us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC