Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Bin Laden already under the custody of Pakistan when we took him out?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:39 AM
Original message
Was Bin Laden already under the custody of Pakistan when we took him out?
Living in a huge mansion at a military town with barbed wire, 18 feet walls, and security gates is not exactly how a highly sought after terrorist mastermind would hide. I think Pakistan's military or intelligence services already had Osama under their custody when we raided the place and took him out.

Or maybe it is possible they were using Osama as a bait to lure in the number 2 guy (Egyptian Doctor).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Possible. A kind of house arrest. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think so too. They probably had done the DNA tests a while ago.
Otherwise they would not be so sure about killing Bin Laden when the DNA tests are still underway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. The problem I have with this, lol, is that there have been too many
credible reports of his demise long before this.

At the moment, I am agnostic before the buffet of bull we have been served up about bin Laden over the years. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Custody?
More like protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep...absolutely he was under their protection. Notice how fucking quiet
they are about this raid???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. The last video from him came out in 2004 compound was built in 2005
I think they had him in their custody and that is why OBL went quiet since then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. it sure sounds like Pakistan was knowingly caging the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Obviously
you have zero knowledge of how people live in high-risk areas of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Well, I do know how that works and this home was outside
even that standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. I think protection rather than custody
That is why we didn't tell Pakistan about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Some sort of protection
to be this publicly and stylishly castled. Probably had to decide between a life on the run from one Tora Bora to another and layering himself with at least factional help in the style he not only desired but needed for his health. None too swift from an intelligence point of view, especially with the US operating fairly openly inside Pakistan but his real security had to come directly or indirectly from Pakistani divisions. If there is an inside story of Pakistan's state assistance or betrayal one might think it is much less important than the end of America's most singular mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. This administration was fucking brilliant
in not revealing this plan to the Pakistanis. It almost definitely would have leaked and got back to Osama.

This was very likely protection and I think it's a fair question to ask how much did Pakistan know? And how high in their military and intelligence apparatus did this protection go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I still think he was in their custody. Last video tape came out in 2004.
Compound was allegedly built around 2005. Osama had gone quiet in the previous years.

Why would they say we got him if their DNA matching tests are still underway? Answer is because Pakistanis had already done all these tests maybe with our assistance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. For chrissakes. Obama has been complaining for a long time
even during the campaign, about Pakistan being complicit in dealings with Bin Laden. That's why he kept saying that if he had to go into Pakistan to get him he would. As I recall, no one else would go that far and it caused a lot of raised eyebrows.

Why can't people just deal with the fact that Obama wins here - even if you say it doesn't stop terrorism, or so what, he still wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. What our governments say in public and what they do together
in private are not the same thing. This really has nothing to do with Obama winning or losing but about how things work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Yeah
I always felt that President Obama was too aggressive, but maybe I was wrong.

There have been a lot of collateral victims in all this; if taking Bin Laden down allows us to back off and ramp down, then it is very, very good step which will save many lives in the future.

I don't think this will make anyone like us more, but it will make people in positions of power think twice about backing such attempts. Knowing that we would hunt a man for nine and a half years, and knowing that he was finally found and killed, shows seriousness. The fact that we had to go into a bunch of different countries to do it shows that we can be relentless. The fact that the attempt crossed two different administrations also sends a message.

And it is VERY true that Obama always said he would do this, and that he has been very aggressive about it. He is due the credit, such as it is. I do believe that 90% of the country will feel that this a victory and a step forward.

I feel great worry about our bombings in Yemen and Pakistan, not to mention what is happening in Libya. I cannot grieve over Bin Laden's death.

It also gives this administration a chance to declare victory and get out; that buys Obama and the country some leeway. I certainly hope he uses that leeway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC