Don't you think it is wrong to question my motives just because some DUers do not agree with ...

[Tx4obama]

the content of an article or DU post.

The is the second time that I have had an OP locked do to a moderator questioning my motives.

The locked thread is here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x717205#717480

I find it highly appropriate to expose a public figure if their intention is to work against democrats.

I find it wrong for DU to questions my motives , and for a moderator to accuse a DUer (ME) of posting an OP to intentionally cause a 'train wreck' I find offensive.

Is there some reason that exposing Dan Choi's political leanings is against DU rules?
And if so please direct me to that rule.

[Skinner]

1. It's not out of bounds to criticize Dan Choi on this website.

But if you do it in a highly provocative fashion you take your chances.

[Tx4obama]

2. I believe when/if moderators are locking threads they shouldn't do it as a 'call-out'

Example from the 'locking message' from the locked thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x717205#717480

In my opinion it should not have been locked with such a nasty comment posted by a moderator. The moderator has a right to his/her own opinion but I do not believe they should be allowed to publicly ridicule a DUer with a false accusation.

I believe that in this case the wording of the locking message was highly offensive and an apology is in order.

Thank you for your time.


p.s. I still do not see why my OP which mainly consisted of 'the facts' was locked, I believe it was locked only due to the fact that other DUers who support Choi complained because they do not want 'any' criticism at all of Choi posted on DU.