Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How did the discussion of the Ft. Hood case get so bassackwards in the MSM?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:44 PM
Original message
How did the discussion of the Ft. Hood case get so bassackwards in the MSM?
Edited on Fri Nov-20-09 02:45 PM by Ken Burch
Why are they acting like the military didn't try hard enough to get rid of Hasan, rather than asking why the military didn't just grant Hasan's request to be allowed to resign?

Why do none of them point out that Hasan actually offered to repay the costs of his military-subsudized education if only they'd let him leave?

Why are they acting like he was struggling to stay in and kill, rather than begging to be let out?

And why do none of them acknowledge that, if Hasan HAD been allowed to resign, the shootings wouldn't have happened?

How did this inversion-of-reality meme spread so thoroughly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seems you've got some pretty specious assumptions yourself there, Cronkite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because most of the people in news these days are not journalists.
They are people looking for a sensational story and are mostly opinion writers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. So you buy the bogus "Hasan was a jihadi" thing?
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No, I think he was fucking nuts.
You?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He did have problems. The point is, he was begging to be allowed to resign
Edited on Fri Nov-20-09 03:00 PM by Ken Burch
The Army and the war were the source of his rage. Had he been allowed to resign, Hasan would never have harmed anyone.

I also think the man should have a neuroligical examination. There could be a tumor in the area of his brain affecting impulse control. That's on the left side of the brain, which also controls the right side of the body. The fact that his right eye has always looked "off" in the photographs has also made me wonder about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. So you don't think he was nuts.
He was mad at the Army because they wouldn't let him go and that's why he did it. OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I said he had issues. Serious ones.
Why is it so important to you that the specific phrase "He was nuts"(a phrase which is insulting to anyone with mental health issues, btw, and one you should never apply again to anyone)be the phrase I use?

What is it about that specific phrase that is so crucial to you?

The man was trying to get out of the Army and not be deployed. The Army was going to force him to deploy anyway. It's the ARMY's fault for not discharging him and turning him over to civilian mental health professionals.

Personally demonizing and denigrating the man serves no purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Again...what is your fixation with the phrase "he was nuts"?
And why are you acting like a prosecutor in a trial or Bill-O on the Factor in this exchange?

Your tone here serves no purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metalbot Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. You can't have it both ways...
On the one hand you say that he would never have harmed anyone, and on the other you suggest that he might have a tumor and poor impulse control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. evidence for your claims please.
And how do you know he hasn't had a neuro work up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. He was crazy! You saw it - so did I why didn't the army see it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And why is the MSM pretending the guy was jihadi when he wasn't?
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Why?
Because that's the description that gives them their ratings. And it's all about ratings and the truth be damned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
28. Are all the facts in on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
32. It's abundantly clear that he was a religious extremist with intense faith-based animosities.
Edited on Sun Nov-22-09 08:32 AM by burning rain
In committing his crime he acted on those animosities. If he was nuts, well, that goes hand-in-hand with intense religiosity--the two things do not exclude each other. Something worth looking into, though it could be difficult to ascertain, would be whether anyone intentionally failed to take action regarding religious-extremist red flags he sent up, for fear of appearing bigoted, which is an acute concern in the military, and having bias imputed to you can easily harm your career. It could be difficult to ascertain in this case, because pretty much by nature when someone doesn't act on a suspicion, he keeps his mouth shut about it. There's no avoiding the fact that religious freaks, most but not all of them Christian, have run amok in the US military, and the problem needs to be dealt with. We need to get away from this mindset that you can do whatever the hell you please, so long as you do it in the name of religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garam_Masala Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. You don't think the guys who crashed into
twin towers were nuts? How about those who strap bombs and blow themselves up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. The military should identify potential risks
particularly ones coming from people who are counseling returning soldiers.

Regardless of motivation, ideology or religion.

That's the issue. That's why we keep failing to prevent new attacks. We don't know how to focus in this country.

And there is no guarantee this guy wouldn't have found a different target if released from the military. He should have been sent to a psychiatric unit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. He could have been discharged and then immediately committed for psychiatric help
Hasan was always going to have a better chance of getting that in a civilian facility than with the Army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Committed why?
For what? He made no threats.

The military can order people to do whatever they want. THEY could have ordered him to a pscyhiatric unit.

If he had been released from the military, the only thing that could have been done is to pick him up on a FISA deal and hold him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. OK They could have sent him to a psych unit
Then discharged him when he had been stabilized(also after giving him a neuroligical exam to rule out the possibility of a brain tumor affecting impulse control, as I mentioned above).

In any case, promising him, while he was in treatment, that he would NOT be kept in the Army and would not have to fight in Iraq would have done wonders to ease the man's mental state and likely would have prevented the whole nightmare.

This happened because the Army was more fixated with "not losing its amendment" than with keeping its own personnel safe from unnecessary risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That's fine
That's exactly what should have happened.

You can't define someone else's behavioral problem based primarily on what upsets you. That's the same thing right wingers do when they only look at the religion. You have to wipe all of that out of the way, and look at the individual circumstances in order to see any problem clearly. And get a number of people around you to do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. the scare quote in that last line should have read: "not losing its INVESTMENT"
I'm using my backup glasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because facts have a well-known liberal bias
And the MSM ain't liberal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. They are a Corporate Propaganda Delivery System
There really is no "news" anymore. All networks are owned by a small number of corporations, and/or institutional stockholders.

It is not only a much more interesting story if anyone accused can be called a terrorist, it also makes money for their main business, which is of course the institutional mass murder we call war. Lying is only a tiny sin compared to what they really do.

War itself, generally, is only a side business to the primary business which is Resource Acquisition and Scarcity Creation that creates demand. Take, for example, the false scarcity tactic to get people to take the H1N1 vaccine.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ly5DR_3D_mA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
19. i'm still curious about the reason behind the first press conference
where a lot of the major facts given out had to be changed later that night....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Did he formally request to be discharged?
I did a quick search and the articles I saw said he did not.

http://www.dailytribune.com/articles/2009/11/12/news/srv0000006805346.txt

http://www.wane.com/dpp/military/army/no_record_hasan_sought_army_discharge1258038825537

I dunno, I see where his Aunt claimed he did, but the articles I've found say he never officially requested a discharge.

Even if he was BEGGING for a discharge, why would that in any way excuse his shooting 40 or 50 people? He could have just gone AWOL and paid the consequences if caught couldn't he? I mean kill 50 people or just refuse to deploy? Hmmmm.

No, I think the bulk of the media has this story about right. He was a disturbed individual who become obsessed with a fringe element within his religion and ended up murdering people. I don't see a whole lot more to it. There are radical elements of all major religions, we have Christians, Hindus, etc who gravitate to the extremes and do horrible things too.

All in all, I don't have a major problem with most of the media coverage. Fox tries to conflate it into a greater conspiracy ofcourse, but that is kinda to be expected from that network since they will twist any story to try to hurt Obama or the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. All too many posters are claiming that this officer,
a technical(medical)officer and not a LINE officer was attempting to avoid deployment. He would not have been in combat, would have continued the work he was doing at Walter Reed, and would never been in command of combat troops(except in their capacity as patients in whatever clinic he worked at).

So, then, what combat was he attempting to get out of? Battle of the Bedpans maybe?

As a shrink, his specialty would have been in short supply so no resignation would have been considered.

As to repaying his educational loans...we stopped allowing 'buyouts' shortly after the Spanish-American war. He had literally years of service in which to repay his loans and failed to do so until faced with a situation he didn't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. And I can't find any evidience he officially filed..
...to get out of the Army anyway. I see no stories that show he filed for objector status. He never went AWOL. Other than maybe telling his Aunt he wanted out, that seems to be where his attempts to solve this problem peacefully ended.

Looks to me like the OP completely misses the mark with this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. No kidding. Talk about twisting the meme. He knows of what he speaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
24. exactly
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
29. The army says that he did not ask to resign. regardless the man
should have been removed years ago. he was seriously mentally ill and mistreating patients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
31. How did the discussion of the mentally ill cases get so bassackwards in the MSM?
"Why are they acting like the military didn't try hard enough to get rid of them?"

Ask a vet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our fourth quarter 2009 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC