Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Right Seizes On Ed Schultz Line

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:49 AM
Original message
The Right Seizes On Ed Schultz Line

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_12/021606.php

RIGHT SEIZES ON SCHULTZ LINE.... Earlier this week, MSNBC's Ed Schultz appeared on "Morning Joe," and pressed David Axelrod on health care reform, criticizing the Democratic plan from the left. Soon after, on his radio show, Schultz said White House officials were emailing hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski -- during the program -- to complain about all the liberal critics of health care reform on the show.

"Now think about that," Schultz told listeners. "Here's the White House getting in contact with 'Morning Joe' because they're afraid there's too many lefties on the air!"


Schultz's comments were, not surprisingly, quickly embraced by far-right bloggers, who said Schultz confirmed fears about MSNBC being in cahoots with the president's team. After all, the argument goes, if White House aides are communicating with "Morning Joe" hosts during the program, it suggests ... something nefarious. One went so far as to call it "state control" of the media, adding that it would be scandalous if conservative media figures "had been caught taking orders from Bush during the program."

James Joyner, himself a conservative, noted how silly this is.

Now, first of all, all we know if that Schultz claims he saw the hosts looking down at their BlackBerries during the show. He doesn't claim to have seen the messages or that the hosts said they had a question from the White House. It's pure wild ass speculation on Schultz' part.

But let's take a leap of faith and presume that MSNBC's show hosts do in fact get emails from the White House trying to spin them. Is that really that shocking? The White House has a rather sophisticated communications shop, after all. If the hosts are checking their emails while guests are on the air -- which strikes me as a rather bizarre thing to do -- then it stands to reason that they get whatever emails are sent during the show, including those from the White House.

How, exactly, does that translate into state control?


It's the political equivalent of working the refs. Watch any NFL game and you'll see players and coaches pleading with the officials to throw a flag or reverse a call. And every so often, the ref will change his mind after hearing the argument! Does that mean the refs are under the coaches' control? Of course not.

And, one presumes, Limbaugh, Hannity, and Levin did indeed get messages from the Bush administration and other Republican operatives during their broadcasts. Hell, Limbaugh has admitted to "carrying the water" of the party, putting a spin on things contrary to his own beliefs in order to help Republicans win. He was getting his talking points from somewhere.

Does anyone really think Joe Scarborough, a former Republican Congressman from Florida who many presume has future political ambitions, is a stooge for a Democratic administration? It just doesn't make any sense.


Regrettably, the failure to make sense seems largely irrelevant here. What matters is getting people excited, not keeping them informed.

—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. How do we know this isn't true? Ed works there, probably knows what's up.
Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Didn't you get the memo? Ed Schultz has been thrown under da bus.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes I have noticed that. Getting crowded down here.
He spoke about what seemed to be a risk to his job the other night, this was probably part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayla9170 Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. If the Right is Using Ed's Lines....it is probably because
He called them. He still does have some friends and family to connect with, since he was a former GOPer. They are probably in his My Faves. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Don't you think Ed should provide evidence before making wild accusations?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. The right are desperate. It is a double edged sword if they use this as a campaign issue
First of all Ed Schultz will bite them in the ass, because he will point out what they are trying to do

Second, even Ed has been modifying his views on this. He admits it helps people, and suggests it will get changed

Third, Democrats all all voices to express their views. That is not allowed in right wing and republican circles. Which is better?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. I gave up watching Ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. So have I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Over the top drama queen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Why because criticism of the president/Dems was too hard to handle?
Are you seriously saying that middle aged boring guy who looks like my dad looked when he was 55-is a drama queen? That he's not doing it because he believes it? He's just a sellout for the money huh? I heard the opposite the other day, he said he's going speak his mind even if it cost him his job. The gist was-he's too LEFT. Did you see the health town hall he did the other day? How upset the people without insurance made him?

I mean he actually stands with the people. I watch his show every day. He tries damn hard to give the president and Democrats a break. Some on this board only stand with Obama-no matter how rightward he turns. I don't understand your people anymore. Are you really afraid to face what critics say? No, you just dismiss them with ad hommim like drama queen or other nastiness. I continue to be stunned that democrats continue to act just like Republicans did under Bush and can't stand any criticism of their leader.

I've been watching your trapped duck for years and now I just feel sad. I guess it's only cheerleading for the team and the issues be damned. It really makes me sad.

I suppose you'll just attack me now. But you guys were here all those dark Bush years and now after all of that, all that propaganda and lies, you are going to stick your fingers in your ears and pretend that there is no valid criticism of what's going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. wasn't enough of a lovefest for groupies, was he?
Ed's show is for the people who have put away Tiger Beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. it would be scandalous if conservative media figures "had been caught taking orders from Bush....
You mean they weren't? Give me a break!

Scandalous, hell it was common knowledge. Nobody in any position of power could do anything about it.

Remember, those were the days when congressional democrats had to hold hearings in a basement, because the republican majority would not allow them any other space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I Didn't Get That Impression - If The WH Did In Fact Blackberry AM Joe.......
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 12:20 PM by global1
that they were trying to control MSNBC & send them orders. I got the impression that they wanted to defend their position. That's why Axelrod agreed to come on the program. He made himself or the WH made him available.

Seemed like they wanted 'equal time'.

What's wrong with that?

Didn't we use to have 'equal time' for people to state and defend their positions?

All we have now are talking heads that spin.

I think it is good to know that the WH is listening to the banter on the cable shows and is willing to come out themselves and defend their positions.

BushCo just had their lackies do it (Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, et al).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. So many people under the bus now
nobody left to drive it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. There's another thing Ed said they are outraged over
Something about the GOP wanting us all to die.

Which just might be true. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. "state Control over Media"... that would be FOX news idiots!!!!!
good lawd is the right wing a bunch of dorky liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. People like Ed are becoming tools for folks on the right
Willing tools at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. My articles appear on right wing sites. Does that make me a tool?
No, when someone appropriates your words to their ends, that makes them manipulators.

And it just makes the right wing better spinners. If the left spent as much time spinning against the right as it does against the left, maybe we'd get somewhere. Maybe.

If you think your idea all the way through, what you advocate for is silencing not only dissent but even supportive political speech from the left because anyone can take any statement and spin it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Ed is being used as a tool to attack Obama
That's what I mean. The right is using Ed to attack Obama.

Just like how people use a hammer to hit a nail. What is a hammer? It's a tool. Ed in this case is the hammer or the tool if you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The right wing is good at working with whatever they have.
That doesn't mean Ed or any of us should shut up. It means we have to get better at countering them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. But he's also a willing tool in this case.
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 04:16 PM by Cali_Democrat
Am I supposed to believe Ed here when he says that Obama's White House is getting into contact with Morning Joe because they think there are too many lefties on the air. Really?

He doesn't have any real evidence to back this up. He's just making a wild accusation without thinking and the reich wing is running with it and using it to attack Obama.

That makes Ed a willing tool for the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Given that the Obama White House slams the left about once a week,
Ed is probably right.

IOW, the Obama White House spends a lot more time tamping down the left than tamping down the right.

Is that okay with you? I find it pretty disturbing myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Again....there's no evidence to back up Ed's claim
Claiming that a Democratic White House is getting into contact with major media outlets trying to get "lefties" off the air is pretty bold.

You had better have some evidence to back this up because it's a very shocking and disturbing accusation. Ed provided no real evidence for this.

That's not fair IMO and now the right is using this to show that Obama is controlling the American media.

I find that to be disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. LOL. Is it really? That's nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. LOL!
The only tools are the ones pulling such nonsense out of their arses and posting it on message boards.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Well it looks like Ed pulled this one out of his ass
He's claiming that Obama's White House is getting into contact with a major media outlet and trying to get lefties off the air.

That's a pretty shocking accusation. Evidence would be nice to have in this case.

So...who's really pulling nonsense out of their asses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. Ed has gone of the deep deep end recently

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC