Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ron Paul, Zionist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 09:54 PM
Original message
Ron Paul, Zionist
In the New York Sun, Seth Lipsky makes the case that Ron Paul should be included in tomorrow's Republican Jewish Coalition beauty contest:

I've also covered Congressman Paul for years and have come to have a great deal of respect for him, even when we disagree. Which we do in respect of granting foreign aid to Israel. At least we disagree in part. I support giving to our allies, particularly Israel, military aid, which is what we are mainly now giving to Israel. It strikes me as important, especially in a time of war, and I would back Israel to the hilt. Foreign economic aid, however, has long struck me as a dangerous course for recipient countries.

There are good reason to include Ron Paul. He is, in one sense, a true Zionist, a believer in two core values of the Jewish liberation movement: Jewish independence and Jewish self-reliance. Independence is self-explanatory; self-reliance, in the context of national defense, holds that the Jewish state shouldn't seek the help of foreign soldiers to defend it.

I was struck in the foreign policy debate by something Rick Perry said, when asked about a looming confrontation between Iran and Israel: "(I)f we're going to be serious about saving Israel, we better get serious about Syria and Iran, and we better get serious right now."

"Saving Israel" should ideally be Israel's job. This is what Israelis tend to think. And it is also what Ron Paul tends to think. Here is some of what he said in the foreign policy debate on this subject: "Israel has 200, 300 nuclear missiles. And they can take care of themselves. Why should we commit -- we don't even have a treaty with Israel. Why do we have this automatic commitment that we're going to send our kids and send our money endlessly to Israel? So I think they're quite capable of taking care of themselves." (emphasis mine.)

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/12/ron-paul-zionist/249532/
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ron Paul is often nutty
but he's the ONLY candidate from either major party to simply say that we should stop treating Israel as this pathetic beggar nation, and tell them to fend for themselves...

It's time to cut this cord. Israel is a sovereign nation. We should not be fighting that country's wars for them. At the same time, that entails us staying out of their business when it comes to deciding its foreign policy. Let them decide how to solve their own demographic and occupational crisis. In time, maybe they will learn that the continuous expansion of settlements is not doing them any good. But ultimately, these little carrot and stick initiatives and games have to simply STOP.

And this whole notion of military aid should stop altogether - that means absolutely no aid for Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, or whatever other nation. I'm sick of my taxes supporting thuggish authoritarian regimes around the world...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ron Paul
supports cutting all foreign aid, not just to Israel.

He also supports eliminating five federal departments, including the department of Education, and repealing health care and Wall Street reform and pretty much every significant regulation enacted this century.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-06-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And he's anti-choice.
Seems that libertarian-keep-the gov't-small theory stops at the doorway to womens' reproductive health.

How does any libertarian justify imposing their religious beliefs on anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC