|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 03:55 PM Original message |
President Obama has proven he cannot be bought, so Wall Street donors snub him and turn to Romney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. Deleted message |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 04:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Wall Street donors should know. His constant critics have shown they have no facts on their side... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
great white snark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. So now you speak for Wall St.? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theaocp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. As an aside, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 07:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
43. you got to cast a lot of bait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 05:38 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. What Warren Buffett said about why Wall Street is "withholding their support" for President Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 05:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. The 99% aren't feeling particularly embraced with Obama's cabinet choices. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 05:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. You don't speak for me or the large majority of liberal Democrats who approve of this President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 07:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Check the news. There is a thing called OWS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 07:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Um, I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 08:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Not reflected in your reply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bodhi BloodWave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 01:40 AM Response to Reply #13 |
39. those 99% don't all disapprove of Obama tho so trying to imply that is foolish n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. True - if he made some big changes there it would signal a critical turning point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow2u3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. He can start by firing his Wall Street cabinet members and advisors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 09:07 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Why should he? Did you demand this of every Democratic President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 01:58 AM Response to Reply #8 |
40. You speak for the 99%? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 07:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. but those folk aren't BUYING him, Wilms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
12. "Shown he cannot be bought." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. Deleted message |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
17. "can't be bought" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 10:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
38. Made me laugh, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
18. Deleted message |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 07:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. That's sad, but looks to be true considering how he's tried to stay on their good side... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 08:16 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. No, he pushed through Wall Street reform, which put him on their bad side of Wall Street. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. "Wall Street 'Popping Champagne' Over Watered-Down Financial Reform Bill" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. "U.S. Chamber of Commerce Coordinating Wall Street's Stealth Lobbying Campaign To Kill Reform" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 08:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. "They were unsuccessful." LOL - keep telling yourself that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 09:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. It's a fact, dear. Read all about it. --> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 09:14 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. They were very successful in watering it down, "dear." Keep dreaming. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Happy? Not nearly enough, Precious. --> "Volcker Rule Unveiled: May Slash Wall Street Bonuses" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 08:54 AM Response to Reply #30 |
45. Deleted message |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 08:11 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. That's a false narrative. Empty negative rhetoric is such a bore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
28. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
32. and yet his largest donor IS wall street. not employees. Wall Street. period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 10:10 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Prove it. FYI: Out of 760,000 donations in Q3, 98 percent came in increments of $250 or less. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 10:13 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. How it looks so far (vs romney, for instance): |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
50. AND because they are allowed to. Elections should all be publicly funded, period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 02:06 AM Response to Reply #32 |
41. Blatantly false. This is what happens when people omit qualifiers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 03:56 PM Response to Reply #41 |
49. You proved my point. Add up the amounts by sector. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 05:00 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. So what? By your logic, you proved my OP's point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 05:42 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Your Op's point is pure conjecture. Obama hasn't proven anything to anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 05:51 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Those are false statements. You're entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 10:19 PM Response to Reply #49 |
73. Okay, we can do that: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
33. so when and how did he prove he can't be bought? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 10:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Did you bother to read the OP? Follow the money trail detailed in campaign finance reports. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 03:54 PM Response to Reply #35 |
48. Did he turn down money from a big bank? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 04:59 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Moving the Blame Obama goalpost now that I've proved you wrong twice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 07:32 AM Response to Reply #33 |
44. it was a lease with an option to buy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-16-11 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
37. proven eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
42. it seems like every post by you should begin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 08:55 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. And end with: "Super Obama lived happily ever after!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
47. oh for fuck sake!!! I'll support Obama. There is no choice. And I even think he might move in a more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 04:54 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. Facts add to people's intelligence: "Why Wall Street Hates Obama" (Slate) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 05:14 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. The fact is they think Romney is probably going to win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 06:01 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Let 'em think it. They thought Hillary was "inevitable" in 2007, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 07:20 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. yeah, we DO know how THAT turned out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 07:41 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Yeah, things are going sooooooooo well in the country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 08:10 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. It's getting better --> Gallup: "U.S. Unemployment Down Sharply in Early October" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. Deleted message |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 08:08 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. "THE FUCKING PROBLEM" = Republicans and Blue Dogs who block Pres. Obama's liberal bills |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 08:51 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Obama bears NO responsibility whatsoever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #67 |
70. No, he doesn't bear responsibility for how Republicans in Congress vote. Review Civics 101. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progsrock (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-11 02:45 AM Response to Reply #70 |
115. Can't blame the Obama for congressional obstruction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 07:35 PM Response to Reply #58 |
60. right now there is a new wave of popular rebellion that may very well give |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 08:22 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. I doubt if Republicans will change their Congressional votes because of OWS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #60 |
69. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 09:15 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Deleted message |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
51. since it's chilled anyway, he might as well go ahead and fire all their tools on his economic team |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #51 |
80. Why should he? Did you demand this of every Democratic President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 11:37 AM Response to Reply #80 |
83. That Ron Suskind book made it sound like Geithner doesn't think he works for Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:31 PM Response to Reply #83 |
95. Ah, so Ron Suskind is your unimpeachable news source. That explains so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 03:13 PM Response to Reply #95 |
98. you didn't address the other half of my reply--doesn't someone's resume show the kind of job they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 03:14 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. who would you consider a more reliable source? He seems to be pretty well regarded in establishment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leontius (380 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
62. Oh he's been "bought" already, they're just hedging their bet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. There's no proof of what your claim and plenty of evidence against your accusation, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
72. Ah, I see you're trying out to be a comedian, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 10:28 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Ah, I see you're ignoring factual analysis in favor of a "joke" of a conspiracy theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
75. "has chilled" "could widen" "escalates his criticism" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbral (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-17-11 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
76. Rather, can't be bought 'cheaply', the pharmaceutical industry managed to find his number. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 10:51 AM Response to Reply #76 |
79. This is yet another false narrative that is not backed up by any facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
77. Oh please. He was bought by the heathcare industry, the banking industry, the pharmacutical industr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 05:34 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Deleted message |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #77 |
81. Yes, you do "go on and on" making baseless false accusations. The Democratic base knows better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 11:30 AM Response to Reply #81 |
82. Deleted message |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 11:49 AM Response to Reply #82 |
84. It is sad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 04:02 PM Response to Reply #84 |
102. Deleted message |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #102 |
109. The facts in my OP are not "blind" but your refusal to acknowledge them is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
85. You think Obama isn't bought? ROFLMAO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 11:55 AM Response to Reply #85 |
86. I and most liberals in the Democratic base do. You are in a small minority of 18 percenters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. I'm not a Dem. I'm an independent Leftist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:10 PM Response to Reply #88 |
92. Deleted message |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 09:29 PM Response to Reply #88 |
110. lol! Why am I not surprised? That means your opinions are among an even smaller minority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fearless (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
87. Yup that single payer health care is really doing well!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:04 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. "Single Payer Advocates Say Bernie Sanders 'Not A Fighter'" (Nov. 27, 2009) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fearless (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #89 |
90. We're talking about Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:07 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. No, you're "talking about Obama." I'm talking to you about historical FACTS which I've proven. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fearless (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-11 12:48 AM Response to Reply #91 |
112. I am talking about Obama... who did not support single payer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kitsune (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
93. The man whose economic policy is written by Goldman Sachs alums can't be bought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 12:28 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Your simplistic insinuation is not fact-based. Funny how Elizabeth Warren never accused Pres. Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
96. Maybe he can't be bought, but he can sure be rented......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 02:11 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Well, Pres. Obama isn't selling the Lincoln bedroom to the highest bidder like the Clintons did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 03:24 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. I'll grant you this - Clinton was worse than Obama - Clinton just had the good fortune |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 04:58 PM Response to Reply #100 |
104. Are you implying that all Obama supporters are indulging in "hero worship politics" or just me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 05:35 PM Response to Reply #104 |
107. oh Obama still gets lots of Wall Street money - just not as much as Romney this time around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 05:43 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. No, he is not getting "lots of money of Wall Street money" relative to 2008. Quite the opposite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-11 02:10 AM Response to Reply #108 |
114. granted the term "hero worship" is probably not fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 11:12 PM Response to Reply #97 |
111. Oh, Clarkie pooh, what would your days be like if you didn't obsess on the Clintons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLovinLug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
101. It is more the Democratic Party they snub |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
great white snark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 05:17 PM Response to Reply #101 |
105. Not really but you have to think that way to support your "Obama peddling fast to the right" theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
103. yeh I will believe that AFTER i see the donor logs for 2012. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-18-11 05:24 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. Start now. There's already been far more OFA donations than all of 2007 & early 2008 combined. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loyalsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-11 12:53 AM Response to Original message |
113. Thanks for posting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fokker Trip (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-11 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
116. Um no. Wall Street bought him and then used him up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-19-11 04:53 AM Response to Original message |
117. bwahahahahahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC