Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Class warfare"..."I wear that charge as a badge of honor."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
itsallhappening Donating Member (578 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:26 PM
Original message
"Class warfare"..."I wear that charge as a badge of honor."
"'Class warfare,' they say. You know what? If asking a billionaire to pay the same rate as a plumber or a teacher makes me a warrior for the middle class, I wear that charge as a badge of honor."
-President Obama, 9/27/11


Why didn't he accept that badge of honor and not extend the Bush tax cuts in December 2010? He had a chance then not to ask but tell billionaires they were going to pay the same rate as a plumber or a teacher. He chose not to be a "warrior for the middle class."

Since hearing the above quote, I've been wrestling with what he said. I think there's only one answer that makes sense. He's saying that only because the 2012 campaign is underway.

I heard him say things like that in 2008, but he took a pass on living up to that promise the first chance he got. Now that he's saying it again, what should we believe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Then you must have forgotten the hostage-taking GOP threatening UI benefits
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 09:31 PM by CakeGrrl
if they didn't get some concession on letting the tax rates return to previous levels.

Funny thing about hostage-takers - they don't care about doing harm. The person on the other side of the "negotiation" DOES care...and gets tagged as the weaker for it. That's crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. he gave them 1 more year to DISPROVE that job creating BS.
and fucking uncertainty. fuck, we can all be CERTAIN now, tax cuts don't create JOBS! plus help the unemployed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Beware, Obama is in campaign mode. Should he be re-elected everything he says during this campaign
will be conveniently forgotten just as they were following the '08 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueMTexpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Beware also of anti-Dem incumbent posts on a Dem website.
We already have a bought and paid-for M$M. We don't need consistently and constantly to see Obama-bashing posts here.

JMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. +1
Amazing isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cigar11 Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Everything?
Hea right ... you just go ahead to Vote your conscience ... please.

Meanwhile, there are many who received continued unemployment when they really needed it.
Meanwhile, ask the auto industry who's their buddy.
Meanwhile, the uninsured will finally have hope.
Meanwhile, if you're an American Soldier you now have a date with your family.
Meanwhile, if you're Gay in America, you have someone who gives a shit representing you.
Meanwhile, if you're Old, you have a President who will not screw you.

I can go on, but you get the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe because he didn't want to see $2000 taken from families of 4 at the poverty line in the middle
of a recession?

Letting the tax cuts on the rich expire would have been fine. They weren't going to spend the money. The problem was that this wasn't an option by itself. The economy needs to be doing better if it is going to withstand the 3.2 trillion hit it would take if the tax cuts for the NON-rich expired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. We also would not have had DADT repealed, the START Treaty, and extension of unemployment
benefits.

How soon the ODSers forget this. Too busy blaming the man rather than the Republicans who obstructed everything!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. You are dead wrong in every single way. The Bush tax cut extension was because of middle class needs
You don't really need this explained to you. But the deal was made so that middle class tax levels would stay stable and so that unemployment would be extended.

And the past year has shown us that he made the right decision. This Republican Congress would very possibly not have extended unemployment. They nearly let us default on our debt, you think they give a shit about helping the unemployed?

If you think that middle class tax stability and unemployment aren't huge middle class issues, then you understand nothing about the middle class economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. its Math Warefare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-29-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Here's another thread where you can educate yourself a little concerning facts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. Yep
His campaign patter and actual governing mode are diametrically opposite. He's in campaign mode now.

This "class warfare" bit reminds me of his 'comfortable shoes' pro-union pledge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-30-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kick
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC