Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'I'm your biggest fan": Lady Gaga pays $35,800 to attend Obama fundraiser

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 03:32 PM
Original message
'I'm your biggest fan": Lady Gaga pays $35,800 to attend Obama fundraiser
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 03:36 PM by ClarkUSA
Here are names of other Obama fundraising donors in Hollywood:

$38,500 donors:
Will Ferrell, Gwyneth Paltrow, George Clooney, Tom Hanks, Ellen DeGeneres, Eddy Murphy, and Steven Spielberg

$10,000 donors:
Jane Lynch and David Hyde Pierce

Other donors:
Alec Baldwin, JJ Abrams and Will.I.Am

Lady Gaga was last night paid $35,800 to attend an exclusive Obama fundraising event in California.


Fan: Lady Gaga paid tribute to Mr Obama at the fundraising dinner (file picture)

The singer did not perform at the event attended by around 75 guests, but thanked the President for what he has accomplished and asked a question during a Q&A... According to a source, Gaga asked a question during the Q&A, when she referred to the suicide last weekend of a bullied 14-year-old gay fan of hers.


Tragic death: Lady Gaga asked a question following the suicide of Jamey Rodemeyer, a 14-year-old gay fan of the singer's who said he was bullied

She thanked the President for what he has accomplished in office and then read from a letter from a fan about the suicide of another fan who had been bullied... Gaga praised the President for holding an anti-bullying conference with the First Lady and then made a plea to everyone in the room to do what they can to prevent bullying.

http://tinyurl.com/ladygagasupportsobama






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
63. why is that donkey feller kicking joe biden? what is the meaning of that? does he like fightin'?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lillypaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick & Rec nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Elitist circle jerk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "elitist" is a RW slur for liberals who are highly educated and/or wealthy. Why are you using it?
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 03:57 PM by ClarkUSA
It was a popular RW smear used against both Al Gore and John Kerry during their presidential campaigns. Republicans have begun to use it against Elizabeth Warren in her MA Senate race. It's troubling when I see it being used against pro-Obama donors at a Democratic forum.

What's "elitist" about Lady Gaga?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. A slur? LOL
Anyone in any political party that shells out that type of money is an elitist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, it was used against Al Gore & John Kerry. Now the GOP are using it against Elizabeth Warren.
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 04:14 PM by ClarkUSA
"Anyone in any political party that shells out that type of money is an elitist."

You must be pretty god-like to sit in judgment of people you don't know. Do you even know what the term means?



1. A person who believes that they are superior to others (and thus deserve favored status) because of their intellect, social status, wealth, or other factors.

2. Somebody who believes that society should be ruled by an elite class.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=elitist


What evidence do you have that Lady Gaga or anyone else on that donor list is an "elitist"? Hmm?

I think you'd be more credible if you reserved the term for conservative donors, who actually fit the description exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Lady Gaga runs the world? Who knew?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. she has a control device in her Electric Chapel
for all that world ruling she is doing.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Meanwhile George Clooney is hypnotizing global womenfolk into doing his bidding with his eyes...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. "Obama is." You're now dusting off a RW talking point from 2008.
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 04:34 PM by ClarkUSA
And you keep proving you have no clue what "elitist" means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I read your definition. I do know what it means. Thank you for that.
By your own post, I am correct.

I am not trotting out anyones talking points but reality's. It does have a liberal bias though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. What evidence do you have that Pres. Obama, Lady Gaga, George Clooney etc. are "elitist"?
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 04:42 PM by ClarkUSA
Do you have any supporting evidence that backs up your claim? Remember, here's the definition of "elitist" from Urban Dictionary:

1. A person who believes that they are superior to others (and thus deserve favored status) because of their intellect, social status, wealth, or other factors.

2. Somebody who believes that society should be ruled by an elite class.


Having made serious money in one's lifetime doesn't make anyone an elitist, just like being a member of the middle-class doesn't make anyone a populist.

And you're welcome, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. So you are saying Obama doesn't want the best person to run things?
Are saying he is into cronyism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Those are strawman fallacies. I've repeatedly asked you for evidence for your claims.
You obviously have none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. How many truck driver were there? How about teachers? Construction workers?
Oh yeah, that's for cattle calls and speechifying to say he's one of "them".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. You have no proof for your ridiculous claims and you can't admit it.
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 07:40 PM by ClarkUSA
Gotcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. People with wealth, fame, etc...are elitest...SO WHAT!!!
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 05:11 PM by RichGirl
There is nothing wrong with being an elitest, in fact, I don't know of anyone who wouldn't like to be one. Unless some weirdos think being poor and unsuccessful is really cool!

Republicans have made it a dirty word as if it's a bad thing which proves how stupid and desperate to find fault they are since McCain, Romney...even Bachman and many other republicans are elitest as well.

So really...what is the purpose of you pointing out that these donors are elitest??? Do you think that there's anyone here who didn't already know that????

I for one...would LOVE to be an elitest!!!! I would tattoo the word on my forehead!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
60. Reality DOES have a Liberal bias. Trouble is, you're not being a Liberal.
Making sweeping negative generalizations about people you havent met and whose behavior you havent observed is not Liberal. It's the opposite of Liberal or progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. Why should we feel bad about that?
Sounds like you want us to feel left out or something! Very junior high.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. ^ Not the best definition ^
Clark, I think the definition below, from the online "Free dictionary" is more precise.

e·lit·ism or é·lit·ism (-ltzm, -l-)
n.
1. The belief that certain persons or members of certain classes or groups deserve favored treatment by virtue of their perceived superiority, as in intellect, social status, or financial resources.
2.
a. The sense of entitlement enjoyed by such a group or class.
b. Control, rule, or domination by such a group or class.


I've no dogs in this hunt but IMO perceiving a group of people, particularly the ultra-rich in show business, as elitists, is not particularly 'right wing'. People who happen to have socialised with people of the caliber of those on the list, even if we are leftists, are able to understand the insulated, privileged, aura which surrounds them. Yes, many are elite, catered to, and the more sheltered from 'reality' they become the more elitist some are.

Lady GaGa isn't a very bright person at all. I doubt she understands concepts including the 1st amendment which would prevent the President from issuing an executive order or a dictate against 'bullying' in schools. OTOH, George Clooney is a very intelligent man. Anybody who'd put his muscle behind "Good Night and Good luck" and "Up in the Air" would seem to know a lot about important issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Arctic Dave also called Pres. Obama an "elitist". That is particularly a right wing meme from 2008.
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 07:51 PM by ClarkUSA
So is sneering at liberal Hollywood supporters of Democratic presidents as "elitists". Anyone who has the money to donate $38,500 is an "elitist" according to Arctic Dave, which is ridiculous. There is zero evidence to back up such a judgmental claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
46. Lady Gaga is actually very intelligent and very well informed.
She comments on politics very often, and nobody should be surprised that she would attend a fundraising dinner for Obama.

She was granted early admission to the Tisch School of Music. She writes all her own songs, and plays multiple instruments. She writes songs for a lot of other artists you have probably heard of. From Adam Lambert to Cher. More recently she even directs her own music videos.

George Clooney seems to also be a very intelligent man.

However, I do not see where you get the notion that Lady Gaga is politically unaware. She has pushed the importance to a younger generation of people knowing their own congressmen and calling them to let their voices be heard. She has made youtube videos, spoken at rallies, and has always been a very vocal and active constitute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
48. Not that I care either way but at least lets use a reputable definition...
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 10:21 PM by Fearless
e·lit·ist
Show IPA
adjective
1.
(of a person or class of persons) considered superior by others or by themselves, as in intellect, talent, power, wealth, or position in society: elitist country clubbers who have theirs and don't care about anybody else.
2.
catering to or associated with an elitist class, its ideologies, or its institutions: Even at such a small, private college, Latin and Greek are under attack as too elitist.
noun
3.
a person having, thought to have, or professing superior intellect or talent, power, wealth, or membership in the upper echelons of society: He lost a congressional race in Texas by being smeared as an Eastern elitist.
4.
a person who believes in the superiority of an elitist class.


http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/elitist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GSLevel9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. you're reaching.
These wealthy attention whores certainly ARE elitist...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. You and Arctic Dave have no clue what the definition of "elitist" is.
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 04:18 PM by ClarkUSA


1. A person who believes that they are superior to others (and thus deserve favored status) because of their intellect, social status, wealth, or other factors.

2. Somebody who believes that society should be ruled by an elite class.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=elitist


What evidence do you have that Lady Gaga or anyone else on that pro-Obama donor list is an "elitist"? Hmm?

I think you'd be more credible if you reserved the term for conservative donors, who actually fit the description exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
51. You're right
I prefer limousine liberal. Although that wouldn't fit Gaga, she's right 100% on this and only recently became rich. Baldwin and Sean Penn, however, are the definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. Oh, a call for infighting? I think I'll pass.
On all future posts, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
64. i take it you you're offended by obama raising money for his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love Lady GaGa - glad she's on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Forgot to add I hope she gets all her Little Monsters to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowCosmicSun Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That is true power right there. She can organize like no campaign could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Yes, I believe she is a powerful source and she has millions of
followers. Hell, I'm 68 and I think she's talented as Hell, not to mention a very kind soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
41. I agree. I hope she will help Democrats get out the vote come November somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Again, I forgot to add Welcome to DU (it's an age thing - ha)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Saw news that Obama should make $8 million in the next 4 days.
It was flashed across the screen of one of the cable news channels - either CNN, FOX, or MSNBC had it. That's a good chuck of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. At least he thinks he should pay taxes on that money.
Sad the GOP disagrees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Political campaigns do not pay taxes on contributions, do they? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. The person I responded to suggests that Obama "made" $8 million.
Are they wrong????

Were they lying???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChadwickHenryWard Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. The money doesn't go in Obama's wallet.
It's for his Presidential campaign. It won't be taxed because it cannot be construed as his income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. "Made" as in raised for his campaign, not "made" personal income. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
57. facepalm nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. God...I just can't get past my dislike of these celebrities. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChadwickHenryWard Donating Member (692 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
30. This raises serious questions about money in politics.
I don't know about the rest of the posters on this board, but I don't have $38,500 to give to the candidate of my choice. In fact, right now I don't have any money I can spend on influencing politics. While my concerns are just as valid as any attendee of a $10,000 a plate fundraiser, I can't buy access to decision-makers like some of the exceptionally wealthy individuals listed here. All I have is my voice in public fora like the Internet, which, you will note, doesn't account for much.

Don't get me wrong: the cause that Gaga is promoting is a very important one. She is using the exceptional wealth and fame with which she has been blessed to promote the well-being of marginalized people in American society. This is probably one of the most effective ways that she can promote her cause. To be honest, I think Gaga is totally blameless in doing what she did, even if it contributes to the pernicious influence of money on our politics. But here's the problem: the cause itself only benefits because a wealthy and influential individual has taken it up. I could have a concern that is just as important as anti-gay bullying. I just don't have the money and influence necessary to promote my issues. And of course, many of the people that have money and influence (Koch brothers, e.g.) promote some very bad ideas. The issue doesn't stand on its own merit - it only fares as well as the money and fame of it's advocates can manage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. Isn't that Something...I wonder when Madonna and Paul McCartney will get on Board...
That's really cool. I hope it brings in more big buck.

Thanks for the post... Fascinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Well, considering some people are so "disappointed" in Pres. Obama they refuse to donate a dime...
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 07:55 PM by ClarkUSA
... I'm glad others like myself and Lady Gaga are picking up the slack. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. AND...I can't wait for Bob Dylan to chip in! How much you think he and Brittany Spears are worth?
What about "SNOOKIE" from Jersey Shore.

Remember when some Media Whore asked Obama if he knew who "Snookie" was and he laughed..

I'm sure SNOOKIE is up for a few thousand.

I could go down the list. What about the KARDASHIAN GIRLS! They've gotta be on Obama's Side. After all they appear daily on Huffington Post. ....:eyes: Actually Huffington Post has them a few times a day. Even Josh Marshall at TPM featured SNOOKIE! and from time to time mentions...Jersey Place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Obama will never raise as much Hollywood $$$ as Bill Clinton did in the bad ol' days of soft money.
Edited on Mon Sep-26-11 08:11 PM by ClarkUSA
But Citizens United compels him to do the best he can.

Considering I doubt you'll contribute a dime to President Obama's campaign given your history of consistently negative rhetoric , do you have a problem with his trying to raise money for the Democratic Party for what will likely turn out to be a very close election cycle where Republicans are going all out to win the Presidency, take the Senate and keep the House?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
58. That's mean and unnecessary, Clark
Have YOU considered how many of us who did contribute a good bit early on to Obama's campaign -even in the primaries (I used to send my donations with the saying 'Early Money Is Like Yeast')- now are financially strained to the degree where we don't have any money to donate, even if we wanted to?

My little family is doing far worse than we were in 2007-2008, although working harder, much harder.

You may be secure. I'm happy you are. But please think how much thoughtless jibes may hurt the feelings of those who financially feel we're losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Not at all. You're conflating what I said into a false narrative, Mimosa.
Edited on Wed Sep-28-11 01:25 PM by ClarkUSA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. 'Shaping narratives' is what PROFESSIONAL PR politicos do.
I don't get paid to post narratives or deliver talking point to gullible suckers. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. Is there a specific reason the people you mention can't support the candidate of their choice?
All American citizens have the same Constitution, right?

I'm wondering what the reason is for your anger at Bob Dylan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
44. I really appreciate Lady Gaga......
I've seen her everywhere lately.....Born to Dance, So you think you can dance.....

Seems like she's a very good advocate for the causes that are near her heart,
and that she puts her money where her mouth is. With a downturn economy, since its
much harder for people struggling to give, I see she doesn't mind taking up some of the slack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue neen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. IMHO, people who stick up for the victims of bullies are not "elitest" in any way.
Lady Gaga is using her platform for good causes. :)

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I don't what it is with this labeling. How does this get anything done?
It's like, ain't we got better things to do with this big tent?

One minute folks are saying they aren't gonna give,
then, they don't want folks with money to give either.

How in the hell do we win election without NO money?
Where is this even coming from. Did the election law on money change,
and now, no one but the opposing party needs money to run a campaign?

Do we want to simply put a plastic bag over our heads, and call ourselves breathing better too? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-26-11 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #47
61. Sure they are. They are elite humanists and elite empathizers. Elite and elitist are not necessarily
bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
52. David Hyde Pierce? This is my favorite because
I had him figured as a republican. It's great to be wrong!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. you might be thinking of Kelsey Grammer, David Hyde Pierce did work with Maureen Reagan
on Alzeimers issues and i think they were friends so some might think he was a republican because of that. he attended her funeral and i think spoke also.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. I did think that because of his relationship to Kelsey. Like I said
I'm very glad to be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-27-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Actually, I was surprised to see him simply because he hasn't been that active lately.
I figured that he'd disappeared off somewhere to retire on the money he made doing "Frasier."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-28-11 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
59. Dangit. Too late to rec. How the heck did I miss this???
She gives me the heebie jeebies but I do really like two of her songs and really like her message of empowerment and self-love. Her cover/interview in Vogue recently was magnificent.

Jamey was a beautiful little boy. God, my heart goes out to his parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC