Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton, context, and coverage — a case study

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 07:51 AM
Original message
Clinton, context, and coverage — a case study

Clinton, context, and coverage — a case study

By Steve Benen

If you perused the headlines on several prominent political news sites yesterday, you were led to believe that former President Clinton, in an interview with Newsmax, expressed his opposition to President Obama’s debt-reduction plan, or at least the provisions related to tax fairness.

Newsmax’s own headline: “Ex-President Clinton to Newsmax: Raising Taxes Won’t Work”

Politico headline: “Bill Clinton: No more taxes now”

Business Insider headline: “Bill Clinton Breaks With Obama, Says No To New Tax Hikes”

USA Today headline: “Clinton: No new (Obama) taxes?”

Perhaps the most egregious was Time’s Mark Halperin, who ran this as the lead political story yesterday afternoon. The headline, referring to Clinton as the nation’s 42nd president, read, “42: No Tax Hikes.” The blurb told readers, “In Newsmax interview, Clinton says, ‘I personally don’t believe we ought to be raising taxes … This has been a dead flat economy.’”

What did Clinton actually say? The quote from the former president is pretty straightforward: “I personally don’t believe we ought to be raising taxes or cutting spending until we get this economy off the ground.”

more

Good grief! Of course the MSM will jump on this comment.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Please."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Holy cripes! Check out this Reuters headline
Edited on Thu Sep-22-11 09:02 AM by ProSense
Special report: Crunch time at America's richest union

(Reuters) - Bob King, the president of the United Auto Workers, has a problem: the labor union that credits itself with creating the American middle class has glimpsed the end of the line.

Two years after the wrenching restructuring of the U.S. auto industry and the bankruptcies that remade General Motors and Chrysler, the UAW is facing its own financial reckoning. America's richest union has been living beyond its means and running down its savings, an analysis of its financial records shows.

Unless King and other officials succeed with a turnaround plan still taking shape, the next financial crisis in Detroit may not be at one of the automakers but at the UAW itself.

That picture of the growing financial pressure on the 76-year-old union emerges from a Reuters analysis of a decade of UAW financial filings and interviews with dozens of current and former union officials and people close to the union.

<...>

Classic hit piece! It's just in time for the union negotiations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Clinton was just on Morning Joe and made a point to clarify his positions
He specifically said Obama's tax increases would not take effect until 2013--which he had neglected to point out in his Newsmax interview. As for tax increases for millionaires, he pointed out that, of course, they 'won't solve the whole problem' and further explained President Obama's top rate would be no more than his top rate of 39.6%.

Clinton also made it a point to emphasize Moody's Mark Zandi's projections for the American Jobs Act--that it would create one to two million jobs and boost economic output by 1.5 to 2%.

Thank you, President Clinton, for these points and clarifications. I knew Newsman and Halperin would try and distort what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Chuck Todd played Clinton's Newsmax comments with no context with a panel designed not to clarify
Specifically the part about not raising taxes, of course. Thus, confirming your characterization about the main stream media. They are not worth spit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-22-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder if Halprin thinks Clinton is a dick too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC