|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 08:14 AM Original message |
Dean Baker: The Payroll Tax Cut Did Not Cost Security Revenue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 08:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. I've tried to correct this here & on Twitter, being spread by people who should know better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
young but wise (760 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
2. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. Maybe so but I'm guessing we SS recipients |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 08:49 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Tghe reasson is that the payroll tax, which is more regressive than the income tax, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:00 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. This tax cut manages to reach the people who don't make enough to pay income taxes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #9 |
26. Exactly - it reaches everyone who works - as payroll taxes start at the first dollar earned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-11 12:13 AM Response to Reply #26 |
32. No, it doesn't reach everyone who works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-11 11:46 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Oops - sorry you are (obviously) correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harmony Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-12-11 07:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
38. False |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
starroute (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:34 AM Response to Reply #3 |
19. Actually, this time there's likely to be an increase |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
n2doc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 10:17 AM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Which will then be eaten up by increased medicare premiums |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 02:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. that guys info about COLA is slightly out of date. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
4. But now they have their foot in the door to permanently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. I'm sorry, but thats fucking crazy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:12 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I missed the him saying anything about raising the cap on SS, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:18 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I missed me saying anything about him saying anything about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. The president only talked about making more (adjustments) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:28 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. people are afraid it WILL be extended for a long-ass time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
5. Worse yet for the first time the Republicans can now say SS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:33 AM Response to Reply #5 |
18. THIS THIS THIS!!!! Tie it to the deficit! It's causing us to go into debt! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:47 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. +10000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-11 02:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
34. But blue links? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
6. Dean Baker: The Payroll Tax Cut: A Stimulus That Progressives Should Oppose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 08:44 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Thank you. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:21 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Dean Baker: The Payroll Tax Cut Did Not Cost Security Revenue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:30 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. you mean stick with the false implied endorsment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:39 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Wait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:43 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. well, when someone pointed out that Baker opposes the cut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:47 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Um. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 10:59 AM Response to Reply #13 |
27. Dean Baker: "there should be no deal on a stimulus that involves a payroll tax cut" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 11:50 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Dean Baker on the President's jobs proposal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alc (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
14. or "SS cost $67.2 billion in general revenue" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. Technically FICA goes to SS (OASDI), Unemployment ins, and medicare part A |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bornskeptic (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-11-11 12:32 AM Response to Reply #14 |
36. Wrong. What cost $67.2 billion in general revenue was a tax cut. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
15. I had never heard that misinformation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-09-11 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
31. Thanks for this post. K & R nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNinWB (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-10-11 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
35. Thanks for the clarification. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-12-11 07:29 AM Response to Original message |
37. Nice post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Harmony Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-12-11 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
39. Extremely misleading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC