So now we have the lurky story out there for explaination. Mission accomplished.

[Safetykitten]

"Well, Obama was cautious because of the threat of the military overthrowing him".

But of course, this will be kinda like a conspiracy theory urban legend that will be there always in the background as an explaination of Obama's pliability.

[villager]

1. well, given the previous public executions of a President, senator, and civil rights leader

...the theory may not be as "far out" as you seem to think...

[Safetykitten]

2. Like I said.

[villager]

3. Indeed -- because such speculation has a reasonable foundation in this country

n/t

[Safetykitten]

4. I will not argue the facts of corrupt and evil things our government did. They did. But this begs

the question.

If this was the case, why now is this coming out? Would not Timmy and the gang have some say in this?

[villager]

7. Well, when would it have come out otherwise?

Generally, it takes time for the "truth will out" aspect of things to work.

Though the bad guys are getting more adept at making sure it doesn't "out," nearly as often...

[gateley]

10. So not a military coup type of thing? That's what I got from the

OP but I don't know what you guys are referring to.

Assassination, yes (always a concern, more so with Obama, IMO), but a military-type overthrow seems kind of far fetched.

[Tx4obama]

5. Your OP does not have a link. There is a link below that puts your OP in context

Although it is a FDL link and I HATE to post anything from FDL here is it:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x765591



p.s FDL has a habit of posting Obama bashing articles, FDL is not a website that I would ever promote or believe!

[Tx4obama]

6. Btw, a revolt is NOT the same thing as a coup. n/t

[FrenchieCat]

8. Did you watch the debate?

Which one are you voting for President?

[gateley]

9. Where'd that come from? Thanks. nt

[CakeGrrl]

11. With people like you to help spread it around, no doubt.

:eyes: