Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton, with a Democratic House and Senate for two years, couldn't pass HC Reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
notGaryOldman Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 06:01 PM
Original message
Bill Clinton, with a Democratic House and Senate for two years, couldn't pass HC Reform
Obama did.

I definitely agree with those long-timers here who say the President needs to be a lot more aggressive with the GOP. But I think it's also important to remember that he does have some accomplishments under his belt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the reality check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. But then the repubs
had not yet discovered how much fun it is the destroy the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama got some good regulation through but there wasn't much reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yep - and you can thank Democratic Senators for that.
Edited on Mon Sep-05-11 06:35 PM by DURHAM D
Also, the thing (not reform at all) that Obama got passed was originally written for Senator Dole by the Heritage Foundation in opposition to the plan Hillary was developing.

Did you really want to bring this up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Kinda puts it into perspective.....
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Too bad that what you said is actually not true.
It's a complete myth, akin to Tim Geithner working for Goldman Sachs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's actually completely true.
And Geithner has worked for Goldman Sachs, whether or not he was on their payroll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Ooh, is it time to play "degrees of separation" again?
I'll go first:
DoD = 1
CIA = 1
NSA = 1
Monsanto = 1
Leonard Peltier = 1
Starhawk = 1
Anonymous = 0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. Your confusing Henry Paulson for Geithner.
Henry Paulson is a former CEO for Goldman Sachs. Geithner never worked for Goldman Sachs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. What does this statement do to the meme that President Obama can't accomplish anything without
a Mega-Majority in the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Just illustrates the cognitive dissonance. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. It's the senate, not congress at the time was the problem...abuse of the filibuster rule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Love the folks working hard to miss your point
Rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notGaryOldman Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Amusing, isn't it?
Thank you. (And ClarkUSA.) ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. With a second term & a Democratic congress he can make the necessary changes...
remember Ted Kennedy's dilemma & regret with Nixon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. 1994 was not 2010. A little historical perspective might help.
Besides, what people were clamoring for were JOBS. The WH was tone deaf and it cost them the House.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. A failure to GOTV does not equate a vote protest.
You don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. People just didn't care as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes, Obama passed the Republican plan from 1994.
Edited on Mon Sep-05-11 09:57 PM by jeff47
Yay?

Maybe he can think about a health care reform program instead of a health insurance reform program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. Plus a little of the Nixon plan from 72 too.
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes, he does. Let's not forget that Hillary's healthcare reform bill was stupid!
God almighty, it was so bad that it was hard to believe she actually thought it would fly!

It was basically forcing all employers in the U.S. to provide certain levels of insurance. Like, really...she thought that would pass. Ludicrous. That's the part I remember...if it had a part to address those who were unemployed, I don't recall that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. I don't remember the details, but not ONE Senator on the Finance committee agreed to Hillary's plan
- and Bill Bradley was a senior Senator on that committee then and he was more liberal than she was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. That bill was so stupid because of naivete.
They started with a plan, and then let anyone who wanted to be "a cook in the kitchen" propose changes. Resulted in a confusing mess because they tried to please such a diverse group of interests. And they didn't realize people were going to propose absolutely unworkable things in order to kill the entire project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. he passed the republicans version
of health care reform that they wanted in 94.

yeah, hellava accomplishment.


on a side note, its been interesting watching republicans attack their own idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. you mean the health insurance industry protection act?
we didn't get healthcare reform...the health insurance industry got taxpayer funded and government mandated customers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-11 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. He could have passed a similar bill but thankfully had enough sense not to take the bait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. "healthcare reform"
Edited on Tue Sep-06-11 12:17 AM by Skittles
LOL, give me a break

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
23. Insurance Finance Reform was what Obama passed.
Even Obama called it that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
24. Reform? What reform?
I **have** health insurance and I still can't afford to go to the doctor to get the prescriptions I need TO LIVE. You try it with a $2,600 deductible ...

Reform, my ass. We needed the public option, but that was off the table before it was ever even on the table.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. He means the Insurance Corporation Windfall Profits Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-06-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Oh. THAT one.
Got it. For all the good it does me ...

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC