Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

People are talking about the lost decade. Nuts.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 08:51 PM
Original message
People are talking about the lost decade. Nuts.
It might be a lost millenium.

There are problems much larger than unemployment and the deficit facing us. Peak oil, global climate change, overpopulation, potential epidemics as a result of overpopulation, etc. We're not heading for a double-dip recession. We're heading for an interrelated set of catastrophes that beggar the imagination.

We have crossed the climate tipping point. Soon large areas of the planet will become unsuitable for food production. There will be no oil to fertilize crops, control pests, run farm machinery, or move things around. Your money will be worthless. Ultimately, I imagine the world population will plummet, in some very nasty ways.

Nobody is paying attention to this. The media are lying, disinformation is the norm, politicians campaign on rage and hate rather than on sensible plans to mitigate the onrushing disasters. The public has been trained to reject the warnings coming out of honest and competent scholarship in favor of comforting delusions pushed by the sinister Overlords.

It will take a thousand years for the earth to recover from the terrible damage we have already inflicted on it. With responsible leadership and planning, there are things we could do to soften some of the blows. But none of this is remotely on the public's radar screen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most of the time I just feel like a canary in a coal mine.
Reassuring to know I'm not alone, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And we're the ones gasping for air
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. 1000 years...nonsense
300 years...tops, with our new Chinese overlords in control

thanks America! 我愛你
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why do you hate Obama?
Seriously though, I think it is more managable for us humans to get preoccupied by immediate things than to speculate on the larger picture.

It's a shame, because if we had only taken the energy and environmental warnings that emerged in the 70's seriously and acted on it, we'd probably have spared a lot of the problems we are contending with today.

And the underlying issues in the debates that are going on now will have an effect on the future. But we keep it superficial, and as result people may be looking back on our present as the "good old days."

I got no answers to that, but it is worthwhile to think about and try to do something about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. I tend to agree... this may well be the beginning of the big fall
Not fun but then we who know can prepare. I'm learning to garden and trying to get other stuff in order. I'm not assuming I'll have any services (electricity water etc.) in five years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Lost Decade is Economic Shorthand for stalled, the opportunity cost nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yes, I know. But
the world economy isn't going to get any better, and in any case economic measures don't really capture the real issues of quality of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Given that jobs in 2001 = jobs in 2011, I think
that measure says something about the quality of life for those who don't have one.

One your wider points, I agree. It saddens me beyond words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I know, I was just trying to expand the perspective
beyond the Dow & S&P. I love those concepts like "jobless recovery."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Meh...
Edited on Fri Aug-05-11 10:48 PM by jefferson_dem
While things are not pretty right now...Let's not overstate the case.

It's just American politics.

Hang tough. All will be better before you know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yeah, suddenly we'll be back down to 350 ppm CO2,
the weather will return to normal, all those polar bears will be happily cavorting on the newly re-frozen polar ice, and we'll all be living on the Big Rock Candy Mountain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree with you on some fronts
Edited on Fri Aug-05-11 11:25 PM by fujiyama
though on others, I am not so sure.

It's true that we live in a world of constrained and limited resources. I also think it's about time that we understand that due to global competition and increasing living standards in two very large and rapidly expanding developing countries (China and India), we aren't what we were. The resources that we consumed will likely be distributed more in the future. We won't be able to monopolize them. This of course means higher energy costs. The question is how are those prices going to be offset? More drilling? Or will we invest in other technologies? How much will those alternatives cost and how are we to produce them? What about the resources used to produce such technologies (mining them)? Here I am speaking of rare earth metals, largely found in China. Will we be dependent on them for those?

Overpopulation is another concept. Right now, our nation has a pretty consistent growth rate, of anywhere between .85%-.98%. I don't think this is excessive. I also don't think we want a negative birth rate like say, Japan - causing other potential demographic problems, where fewer workers can support a safety net for retired people. And the reality is that having more than one or two children nowadays is VERY expensive and most younger couples realize this. Birth control is less controversial than it has ever been and I think it should be noted that this administration has made birth control even more widely available by fully covering it. The religious right will always fight it though, but the reality is they've lost this battle and they look very ridiculous. As a free society, we should educate young people more about contraception, but ultimately I don't wish to see a "one child policy" implemented. The real problem with overpopulation is that in the developing world, and mostly among nations least able to afford to raise children. These are mostly failed states (Yemen, Pakistan, and several African nations) with way too much religious influence (mostly majority Muslim, but some are Catholic). Unfortunately with ever increasing debt problems among developed nations, contraceptive aid will possibly decrease to these places.

I do agree about climate change's impacts to ecosystems and environments everywhere. But don't bet for a second that governments won't ignore those effects, if it means tighter regulations and potentially higher unemployment rates. It will be a continuing challenge, requiring changes in lifestyle, but expensive investments as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. What color is the sky on your world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Paisley?
... with pretty ponies jumping through a giant rainbow....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. It's kind of gray and overcast where I live
Were you being snarky or serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. JR, I hear you, but there is a movement that addressed this...
The fact that I cannot even mention it on GDP without it being removed is a shame. That that made a movie and follow up movie as their movement formed is something everyone should be able to discuss here.

So, if you've not figured it out the movie that begins with the letter, "Z", PM me and I'll link you.

As well, there are more conventional grass roots organizations who are trying to talk about Sustainability in our municipalities. Sadly, their efforts get little if any respect.

MMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I guess it's just the spirit of the times--like they say in German,
Edited on Sat Aug-06-11 08:54 AM by Jackpine Radical
der Zeitgeist, nicht wahr?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
17. Silly. We have not hurt the earth one little bit. Made it harder for some lifeforms
Edited on Sat Aug-06-11 04:40 PM by CBGLuthier
ourselves included but the Earth? The EARTH is doing fine and will do fine long after we join the dinosaurs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Harder? We're talking mass extinction. We are making it harder for life.
Especially our kind of life. Will the 3rd rock from the Sun keep orbiting? Sure. Does that follow that it will be a cradle of life? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-06-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. Everything becomes clear...the moment you start believing in Rapture.
See, all better now. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-11 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yeah, but I think that whole goofy Fundie rapture business
is just one more of the lies that the psychopaths in power use to delude the fools into doing their bidding, just as they use abortion & anti-gay politics. The greedhead manipulators don't believe in or care about any of that stuff. They also know the truth about GW.

They just don't care. They're out to grab it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC