Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Fineman predicting a one-page clean debt ceiling bill (Lawrence's show)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:18 PM
Original message
Howard Fineman predicting a one-page clean debt ceiling bill (Lawrence's show)
Did you see this discussion?

I so hope he's right about this - how perfect to end up right back at the beginning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. It would be a relief
but more so if they announced a job bill the next day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wish the prez had been talking about jobs this whole time but, yes, that would be great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anything like that comes from the House though, will be short term
setting up another fight like this before the election. Things are fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Next time the prez should be very clear that anything other than a clean bill will be vetoed.
Edited on Tue Jul-26-11 07:21 PM by polichick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yep, but if it's accurate that the results would be disastrous
for us and the world economy, we'd have to go with that. As the old Seahawks coach Chuck Knox used to say (every damn Sunday) "have to play the hand we're dealt".

Regardless of whether we agree or disagree of how this has been handled, if we come to the 11th hour and this is all we can do, we have do do it and deal with the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. The US dollar might lose its exclusive reserve status if the govt. defaults... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. That's one of the (many) things I just don't get - the value of
the dollar. I guess bottom line is if I can buy two Milky Ways today with $1, and it gets devalued, tomorrow I can only buy one? Something like that? And the "reserve" thing is way over my head. If you understand it, you probably shouldn't waste valuable time and energy explaining it to me, if you're so inclined, not sure it would penetrate my tiny brain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
27. Honestly ...
The hard right half of the republican caucus is not going to sign off on whatever the senate comes up with.

If it is palatable for the house democrats, Boehner is going to have to find the 20 or so Rs who can get away with it to join with the Ds in getting the final deal done.

The party as a whole in the house could give a shiite about the country, but there are going to be enough who are not deranged lunatics who will do what needs to be done here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's all it's ever been, if I'm understanding it correctly. Lawrence
O'D actually wrote one once, and he presented it on his show -- did you see that?

I'm thinking if it gets down to the wire, that's all they will be able to do. Tempus fugit, and all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. I did see that - very interesting! Lawrence has some good insider stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh I hope he's right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can Boehner pull together the votes for that?
The Tea Bagger objection is that raising the ceiling increases the debt, so they want offsets in the exact amount. If they don't go with that idea, they violate their pledge. Moreover, it's not clear that such a bill would prevent a credit downgrade, which would further increase the deficit.

I'm happy enough to see Obama have this argument again next summer, but I'm not sure a clean bill can pass the House. I'd have to think that Obama has made so much noise against a short-term bill that the GOPers would be able to consider it a victory, and maybe sell that to their lunatic constituents, but it would be a pretty clear stare-down by the Prez, seems to me. Maybe it is the only way both sides can declare victory at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Maybe Obama is so against a short-term bill to give them a fake win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's what I was suggesting
He's given them a face-saving way to vote on a clean bill. of course, this very claim will produce such vociferous cries of 11-dimension chess that I hesitate to even make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh, I thought you meant they'd take it that way...
...rather than Obama is giving them that gift.

Good idea, if he is - and I agree about the chess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's just basic negotiation, really
The O Admin doesn't WANT to deal with this again before the election, so they draw the line on the short-term deal. But it's a soft line that can double as a face-saving gimme mfor the other party. I know people like to represent these fairly basic negotiation procedures that can be taught to any college sophomore as some mystical 11-dimension chess, but it's really just simple strategic negotiation: develop some conditions that you want, but are you're willing to give up if it provides advantage; provide face-saving devices for your interlocutor to walk away satisfied. It isn't chess. It's taught in every business program in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well, I hope it works - Teabaggers in the House are really just bullies imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. If that happens it will be with the support of almost all Democrats and just enough repubs
The vast majority of repubs will vote against it (including Boehner).

My prediction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Wonder what Boner's country club masters are telling him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. I hope so (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. Its too late for a clean bill...the markets have aleady made it clear that the Republicans
have gone too far. There will be a downgrade without serious spending cuts in any bill approved. The bastards politicized this and are probably going to win in the end. Its sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The downgrade is not important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Why do you say that? A downgrade translates into higher interest rates
and higher interest rates would put a drag on an already weak economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The Fed has the ability to control interest rates.
We could see an increase in the long rate, but I don't believe it will be significant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. The Fed can control some interest rates yes. But if a downgrade forces us to
pay more to finance our notes then IMO the Fed would have a hard time resisting that trend. But let's hope it never comes to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. It may lead to the acceleration of the decline of the US Dollar, don't kid yourself nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. No ...
the "markets" could care less about spending cuts in reality.

the "markets" DO care to not have this rehashed again in 9 months ...

What has been reported from HONEST sources is that a bill that makes this have to be redone again next year will more likely result in a downgrade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC