Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joe Conason: ‘Dysfunctional’ Too Polite to Describe Tea Party Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 06:31 AM
Original message
Joe Conason: ‘Dysfunctional’ Too Polite to Describe Tea Party Congress
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/dysfunctional_too_polite_to_describe_tea_party_congress_20110720/

‘Dysfunctional’ Too Polite to Describe Tea Party Congress

Posted on Jul 20, 2011

By Joe Conason


As America lurches toward new and unfamiliar status as a nation that defaults on its debts, commentators around the world are wondering how the democratic government that was once the most admired in the world—for many reasons—is now so “dysfunctional,” to use the polite term. But the truth is that the entire U.S. government is not dysfunctional. Much of the government functions well enough or better, and even the members of the troubled U.S. Senate seem to be trying, a little late, to deal with the problem before us.

No, dysfunctional is the too-polite term for the House of Representatives, specifically its dominant tea party Republicans, who can be described in far less dainty psychological terms. Even the most extreme Republican partisans in the Senate seem to realize that their House colleagues, seized by some combination of ideology, madness and pig ignorance, are propelling the country and the world toward economic chaos.

Of course, the tea party Republicans insist that no such thing will ever happen—the warnings from economists, business leaders, financiers and public officials are merely so much “scare talk.”

snip//

Such outbursts prove that the tea party is not only against taxes and spending, but is also strictly opposed to arithmetic, which like climate science is probably just another socialist plot. They also prove the utter insincerity of these characters, who just voted this week for the “Cut, Cap and Balance” bill that would gut Social Security, along with Medicare, while erecting a constitutional wall around tax breaks for society’s wealthiest individuals and corporations. They want to pose as defenders of the middle class and the American dream, even as they promote legislation that would destroy the programs and institutions that are the foundation of that way of life.

There is no need to look too far to find the source of our discontent—our “dysfunction,” if you must. It is in the Congress, which the American people mistakenly turned over to fakers and fools last November. Every poll shows that most voters regret that error now, and wish that Congress would tax the wealthy and preserve social insurance. Now those voters had better make their remorse heard, and loudly, if they hope to avert catastrophe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Bat sh,t crazy" seems about right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. All branches have been dysfunctional for longer than that
Edited on Thu Jul-21-11 09:24 AM by Armstead
I agree with Conason xcompletely.

Except I think it goes much deeper and broader than that. Congress was broken by the influence of Big Money and Big Corporate Power by both parties years ago. The Tea Party is just the most blatant manifestation of that.

And we have a President who has chosen the role of referee trying to mediate, rather than a real coach and leader of the Democrats and the liberal progressive half of the population.

And the Supreme Court is piloted by Corporate Puppets like Roberts and Thomas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wish we had called it "social insurance", not "social security". If it's security, you don't think
it can be taken away. Social insurance is much more accurate anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Turning Congress over to Republicans was such a great idea
:sarcasm: The average voter is at times an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, clearly you mean 'the average voter not on the West Coast'
The entire West Coast elected Democrats in 2010. Elected Democratic Governors as well. So don't include us in your rationalizations for Blue Dog losses. We had nothing to do with the hand over foisted on us by some States. My State had a record voter turn out, by the way.
Wonder what it is we did right that so many did so wrong? We run Democrats who can be differentiated from Republicans. And so we win!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC