Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama the confrontational...Comes Out Swinging

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:01 PM
Original message
Obama the confrontational...Comes Out Swinging
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 01:10 PM by jefferson_dem
Obama the confrontational



President Obama had a simple message for congressional Republicans in a press conference Wednesday: Stand up and lead.

Obama, often in harsh and stark terms, condemned the approach that House and Senate Republicans have adopted in the final stretch of the negotiations surrounding the increase in the nation’s debt limit.

“They’re in one week, they’re out one week,” said Obama of Congress. “And then they’re saying Obama needs to step in. I’ve been here.”

He repeatedly challenged Republicans to make compromises in order to adopt a truly “balanced approach” to the debt deal; “Call me naive, but my expectation is leaders are going to lead,” he said.

Obama’s confrontational approach toward Congress extended beyond the debt negotiations — seeping into answers he gave on job creation, the broader economy and Libya.

On each issue, Obama cast himself as the adult in the room and Congress as an irresponsible child — unwilling to sacrifice their desire to score political points for the good of the country.

<SNIP>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/obama-the-confrontational/2011/06/29/AGlUVtqH_blog.html


Obama Comes Out Swinging

The president's fiery speech today was the type liberals have been waiting for—since the last one. Howard Kurtz on whether Obama will follow through on the rhetoric this time.

June 29, 2011 1:22 PM EDT

Who was that combative president? The guy who came out swinging against tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires, for big oil companies, for hedge fund managers, for corporate jet owners?

The Barack Obama we saw at an East Room news conference on Wednesday—drawing sharp distinctions and demanding concessions from Republicans—is the kind of partisan fighter that liberals have craved for the last two-and-a-half years. Gone was the conciliator-in-chief patiently trying to see all sides; in his place was an amped-up leader determined to pressure his opponents.

<SNIP>

Instead, the president strafed some of the Democratic Party’s favorite targets: wealthy people, oil conglomerates, and Wall Street. They should sacrifice a bit before we ask seniors to pay more for health care, Obama said: “I don’t think that’s real radical.” And in case anyone missed the point, he chided congressional leaders for a “selfish” approach.

Obama positioned himself as a teller of hard truths, denigrating Republicans who insist on no new taxes as people trying “to satisfy their base or get on cable news”—then expressing hope that they could “rise to the occasion.” He even took a swipe at Congress taking frequent recesses while he has been working nonstop on the economy and war and Osama bin Laden.

<SNIP>

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/06/29/obama-s-news-conference-he-criticizes-the-republicans-but-will-he-follow-through.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. If these people would cover Obama's multiple speeches at factories and similar places,
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 01:18 PM by jenmito
they wouldn't be so shocked. He said similar things just yesterday in Iowa. But it's true-he came out swingin' in today's press conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. Come on now...You can't blame the press!
They have been working overtime to cover everything Sarah Palin is doing...They don't have the time to cover less important things like what the POTUS has been saying for months now. Seriously, Sarah Palin's new movie debuted & Bristol Palin has new book out as well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Let me tell ya, buddy, you better talk now because my partner is just crazy
and I don't think I can keep him from beating the shit out of you much longer...

But I wanna help..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. And lest anyone bite on the "call me naive" comment,
I think he's playing a game of "I've asked you nicely" with the obstructionist Rs that won't last much longer.

As I said in another thread, I think that if they hit that August timeframe without moving on these cuts, the President will have alternate plans in place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. I really like that picture of Obama. I wanna see more of that.
But actions speak louder than words or facial expressions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Actions = Veto Pen. Congress makes the law. The President can sign or VETO
congressional actions.

I don't know what "actions" you want him to take other than what he is constitutionally mandated to take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I believe that the Constitution would allow the president to
take emergency action if the actual well-being of the antion was endangered. IOW, the collapse of our credit would invole longterm serious--even catastrophic--damage to our national well-being. He probably could justify using executive orders or some such thing to temporarily assume the power to keep the economy functioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. You believe, but the U.S. Constitution does not allow such a thing.
It specifically gives Congress the "power of the purse." The president cannot issue Executive Orders for budgetary matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. Please cite the specific language in the Constitution that creates
something called a 'debt limit' that only Congress can modify. I agree that there is a 'debt limit' but I find no language in the Constitution that 'specifically' gives authority over it to Congress.

So, from where I sit, Obama could indeed issue an Executive Order raising the debt limit. Then it would be on Congress to pass a law revoking Obama's Executive Order.

Or am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Then get on the phone to Congress because they are in charge of the "actions" on this issue.
President Obama can only lead them so far.

So much for that bullshit "caving" meme, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. On that...
We agree entirely! Let's do this! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ice Number Nine Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama's got Boehner on this one. As August 2 nears, the orange tears will flow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pamela Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Welcome to DU!
I like your user name. Vonnegut fan? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ice Number Nine Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. it's a Vonnegut-Lennon mash-up
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. The three jabs re: Republicans not budging on tax breaks for corporate jets is a great frame.
I predicted that President Obama would come out swinging against Republicans yesterday. I'll bet Republicans are consulting with Luntz now for their pissy "we're victims of President Meanie" response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. The republicans are going to hitch up their pants and get on board
or we are serving them up as exhibit A as to why the country is in the dumpers. I bet there is a LOT of republican sweaty hands about now..that taking the pledge buisness will come back to haunt them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. But, but, but... people said he was going to cave!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. First, they want him to talk to the American people. Then, when he does,
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 02:10 PM by Liberal_Stalwart71
they ridicule his speech and assert that he needs to "act."

Wait a minute: You begged him to make use of the "bully pulpit," which is figurative for what the president does when he gives speeches. Now, you mad because he gave a speech and hasn't "acted," so you still accuse him of caving, even when he hasn't had the opportunity. Then, when someone tells you that ONLY Congress has the authority to move on ANY legislation having to do with taxes and revenue, you still shut down, claiming that the president needs to behave like LBJ.

These people make no sense at all. Their emotions prevent them from exercising any rational thought or string together a coherent set of ideas the flow logically.

I give up trying to talk to convince people who are irrational. They are just as bad as the Teabaggers who's cognitive dissonance WORSENS when confronted with facts/reality of the policy making process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. You can't win. When he fights, he doesn't fight hard enough. When he shows backbone it's just words.
That's how they roll. Always trying to squash Dem votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Amen !
Very well said...Thank you. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Even with all my typos, you're welcome. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
47. If FDR and LBJ were SOOOOOOO persuasive
That Congress would do whatever they wanted Congress to do - it would seem that is unusual, and such magical people only come along every so often, like once a millennium, so having two in one century, it would seem a bit much to ask to have another this soon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. It's early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. I judge by results. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. There needs to be a crow on steroids when this is all settled, as he will cave.
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 02:23 PM by Safetykitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Does your doomsday crystal ball do hurricane predictions, too? If so, the Weather Bureau wants it.
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 02:45 PM by ClarkUSA
:rofl:

Speaking about a president who exemplified caving to the Republicans, be happy DINO DLC Clinton is no longer in office, because he wanted to cut Social Secuirty when he was in office AND just last month he advocated cutting Medicare.

Be glad President Obama has taken Medicare and SS benefit cuts off the table and now he's calling out Republicans on their defense of tax breaks for millionaire perks. Thank goodness we have a REAL LIBERAL in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Perhaps we should start simmering some sauce...
To serve up with the crow?

:rofl:

Yeah, all the crystal balls are throwing sparks right about now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
KelleyKramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. "The Bill I Sign Must Include Public Option"

I have learned from Obama over and over and over, to never listen to what he says.

I only watch what he actually does.

Hopefully my suspicions are wrong, but Obama has a long long record of doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Unfortunately that's true - he often talks one game and plays another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. What'd you want him to do after Lieberman nixed the PO? Kill The Bill?
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 10:35 PM by ClarkUSA
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KelleyKramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. He didn't need Lieberman ...

All he had to do was pass it with reconciliation, which only requires 50 votes (+ Biden). So with that, Obama could have told his old pal Lieberman to go pound sand.

All that talk about needing 60 votes was nothing but a bunch of kabuki bullshit.

And to prove they knew it could have been passed with reconciliation, the final amendments were pass using... you guessed it, reconciliation!

Obama didn't want the public option, he got just what he wanted. All the 'talk' was just that, bullshit theater.

Obama had already sold out the public option with a backroom deal with the private hospitals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. OH not this one again!
That has long been established as impossible.

This is a Republic, not a monarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Mis-remembering the quote? Don't worry, you're not the first.
Edited on Wed Jun-29-11 10:52 PM by boppers
Here's what he actually said:
"any plan I sign must include an insurance exchange: a one-stop shopping marketplace where you can compare the benefits, cost and track records of a variety of plans - including a public option to increase competition and keep insurance companies honest - and choose what's best for your family."

I've learned to listen to *exactly* what he says, not somebody's selective parsing.... and "must include an insurance exchange" is exactly what happened, with (valid, IMHO) arguments about whether or not a public option was part of the "must include"....

...point being, he never said: "The Bill I Sign Must Include Public Option"

edit: missing letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. WHAT?
The quote says "it must include something, including a public option.

I don't know where you learned english, but if I say to my kids "you must wash your face, including behind your ears" that means "they must wash behind their ears".

I wouldn't buy the spin from my kid and I shouldn't even hear it from someone on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Somehow...
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 01:12 PM by BklnDem75
saying "any plan I sign must include an insurance exchange: a one-stop shopping marketplace where you can compare the benefits, cost and track records of a variety of plans - including a public option to increase competition and keep insurance companies honest - and choose what's best for your family."

and saying "you must wash your face, including behind your ears"

seems like two different quotes to me. I mean it fits your spin, but they're not similar in any way whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. "I don't know english"
"I dont' know something english" can be extracted from the sentence posted. See how that works, when words are omitted, the context and meaning is possibly changed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Apparently you haven't listened to him back then either
Edited on Thu Jun-30-11 12:32 AM by BklnDem75
Exactly who are you quoting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KelleyKramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
39. Link (with video)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I know what Obama said
The quote being thrown around isn't it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ice Number Nine Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. why get the quote right? the fake one is so much more controversial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. See post #41.
Your spin shouldn't even show up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-11 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
26. I hope he keeps the gloves on for the next five years - we've had enough...
...bipartisanshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
34. Well I guess this means that the negotiations have failed and he's getting in front of a bad
situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. That is a wise decision then
and forces the Republicans to go on the defensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoryK Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
35. About time, wouldn't you say?
He's been a little TOO cerebral at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
37. I wanna see some ORANGE CRUSH
and Boehner running to his precious box of Kleenex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
44. Oh he is GOOD AND PISSED!! HA!! Tread lightly
mutha fuckas!! Tread lightly!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-30-11 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
46. Even the local paper had to cover this one. And they did not portray him as the stereotypical
"angry Black man" that the right wing so wants him to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC