Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ezra Klein on Mitch McConnell's 'job creator' dogma:Lower taxes on the rich don't lead to job growth

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 08:56 AM
Original message
Ezra Klein on Mitch McConnell's 'job creator' dogma:Lower taxes on the rich don't lead to job growth
Edited on Tue Jun-28-11 09:11 AM by flpoljunkie
Tax rates and job creation in one graph
By Ezra Klein

In theory, the GOP is so committed to resisting tax hikes because it’s so committed to creating jobs. “The fact is you can’t tax the very people that we expect to invest in the economy and create jobs,” says Speaker John Boehner. But Michael Linden’s chart comparing average annual job creation at different marginal tax rates begs to differ:



Ezra Klein
08:49 AM ET, 06/28/2011

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/tax-rates-and-job-creation-in-one-graph/2011/05/19/AGh9Z1oH_blog.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Explain the last column
Under the current tax rate of 35% it shows hardly any job growth, yet under the 28-31% it shows growth at 1.0.

How does that work out exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Those were the tax rates from 1988 thru 1992. See chart below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That was the top tax rate in some Reagan years
Edited on Tue Jun-28-11 09:09 AM by dmallind
That 1.0% was the job growth then. Bit anemic compared to the 50s-60s growth rate with 70%+ top marginal rates eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC