with Democratic help. If Democrats in Congress believe it's a bad deal, they need to do their jobs, primarily in the Senate. All it takes is 41 Senators to block a bad deal.
Republicans were only needed to pass the Senate bill, and with conservative Dems ready to abandon the Democratic caucus, that created the impression that the deal was solely to appease a few Republicans.
If
Sanders' amendment had passed last December, the deal would have been adjusted to include:
<...>
Before they passed the plan, Senators considered an amendment by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who spoke out against the bill for nine straight hours last week, that would have replaced the payroll tax credit with an extension of the Make Work Pay Credit, imposed an estate tax of 45 percent on estates worth more than $3.5 million and provided a cost-of-living-adjustment of $250 to seniors, veterans and the disabled dependent on government benefits. It failed 57 to 43.
<...>
Here are the members of the Democratic caucus who voted against Sanders' amendment:
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN) (gone, now R)
Bennet (D-CO)
Casey (D-PA)
Hagan (D-NC)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR) (gone, now R)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Udall (D-CO)
Webb (D-VA)
There were a lot of good things in the deal, including (
NYT) :
<...>
The aid ending next month increased the federal share of Medicaid spending in all states, with additional help for states where unemployment rates had risen sharply. The extra aid was scheduled to expire last December, but Congress extended it for six months at the urging of the White House and state officials.
<...>
There were two option: pass the deal or improve it (as Sanders' amendment did). The other option would have let everything negotiated via the deal expire and give Republicans more hostages, including the Medicaid funding and unemployment insurance.