Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For all those democrats that though Wiener resigning would make the story go away think again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:33 AM
Original message
For all those democrats that though Wiener resigning would make the story go away think again
Edited on Fri Jun-17-11 09:35 AM by bigdarryl
Now there hounding the women for interviews it never stops I knew this shit would happen.At least she didn't throw him under the bus as others are.I have a feeling this girl really likes Wiener and if he wanted to could have had a physical relationship with her. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/17/traci-nobles-anthony-weiner-photos_n_878951.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Making it go away wasn't the only reason for him to resign.
His treatment of women was a very good reason too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. So
You are in favor of nearly all men resigning because of the way they treat women?
Because what Tony did was relatively nothing.

And how about the way gays are treated? 90% of the officials should resign? Would that make you happy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That would be a start.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Should Obama resign?
Because he could do something about all that but he has not.

Would Obama resigning make you happy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. What?
You pick favorites? You let some go while crucifying others?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Don't overthink it.
I'm just saying there were multiple legitimate reasons for him to resign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. so
You are glad he resigned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. I'm indifferent
I really like Anthony Weiner. He is a NYer and did a great job bringing NY to the House. He will be missed. But...he screwed up big time. He was careless and selfish. He is the only one to blame here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Really?
His treatment of women? Don't recall that being one of the reasons stated for him to resign!

Maybe I missed it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Isn't that what this is about?
Sending pictures to random girls on the internet while married to a pregnant wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. I thought it was the lying.Geez! I can't keep the excuses straight.
Edited on Fri Jun-17-11 10:45 AM by truth2power
edit> typos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Good point
That too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. How ridiculous, another person who thinks poor, weak little
women don't make their own decisions about sex. How about a grown woman sending HIM a PM like this 'HOTTTT!'. Think she wasn't looking for a relationship?

Stop spreading false information. None of the women were cooerced, all appeared to enjoy their involvement, and if they had not there was a DELETE FUNCTION to use, so any of them now who are claiming anything other than complete consensual relationship, are liars. You don't do cyber sex for years or months under duress, because it's way, way too simply to make the other person disappear.

Sick to death of these women who help a guy cheat on his wife, engage willingly in sex and then try to act like some kind of victim when they are caught. Not fooling me, sorry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. There's a few mistakes in what you said.
She didn't send him a PM saying he was hot. She posted it publicly. That wasn't an invitation for a relationship or harassment.

All the women we know about so far "appear to enjoy it." How many of them didn't enjoy it and ignored it?

Either way, he shouldn't be treating constituents and admirers for his dating pool. It's inappropriate as we've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. She says she posted it publicly.
He and they are free, in this country, to conduct themselves regarding legal sexual activity any way they choose. When did we become the moral nanny party? But once she made that decision and continued to do so, it is ludicrous for her to be moaning and whining about how she only wanted to talk about HC, seriously are we that dumb does she think? Two words for her: Delete Function!

It takes two to tango. I know if I were engaged in such an activity, it would be MY CHOICE. No one else's. It's time to stop placing responsibility for the actions women take, willingly, on someone else. When, when will society accept the fact that we are EQUAL to men, and we are perfectly capable of screwing up all on our own without the help of any man.

I would not have done what she did once the Congressman got married. Before that, there was no issue of cheating. But she KNEW he was married and still engaged in cheating on another woman. Because if he was cheating so was she. Idiotic to try to make her look like some kind of victim here. No wonder women still are not viewed as equal in this society.

As for this pure speculation?? How many of them didn't enjoy it and ignored it?
Apparently none, since none have said so. And again, once was all they needed before DELETING what they 'didn't enjoy'! So how could there be women claiming this? This is Twitter, Delete anything you don't enjoy, instantly. If you don't, then it can be assumed you are enjoying it.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm wondering why we don't focus instead on Vitter, the pervert GOPer who retained his seat
He wasn't asked to resign by the GOP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. He's already been re-elected back into office by the voters since the scandal.
And he has the support of the GOP leadership because he didn't lie to them.

There would be very little point in going after Vitter now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. eh
I see the ""Get Weiner Protect Vitter"" force is still in action.

RE: "There would be very little point in going after Vitter now"

I wonder if the "Get Weiner" crew would ever say:
""There would be very little point in going after Weiner now""

I'll bet their obsession lasts a long time, dontcha think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. only as long as he remains left-leaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I take that as a "No"
The "Get Weiner" crew will remain forever obsessed with getting a weiner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Are you glad they got weiner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Absolutely not.
i thought it was clear that i was agreeing with your opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. The day Vitter puts pictures of himself in a diaper on the internet
is the day I'll change my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. Why does the Get Vitter crew never mention Chris Lee?
Vitter was years ago and has faced his voters. Unfortunately his voters retained him but that was their choice. Lee sent a barechested photo of himself to some woman and was gone before the day was up. BTW do you think anyone who breaks the law should have to resign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Yes. Break the law: resign
What Lee did was be a total hypocrite.

Weiner did not break a law.
Vitter is a total hypocrite and why anyone would complain about getting him is a mystery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Do you call on Charlie Rangle to resign?
He cheated on his taxes. That is breaking the law the last time I looked. He did not resign. He faced his voters and was reelected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Was he convicted?
If he was convicted by a court, then yes he should resign.

And why is it that you are now focused on another Dem?
Why don't we go get the Bush Bastards? Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. No he was not convicted and neither was Vitter.
I am not focused on anyone. I just don't believe in double standards. If you do, fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Vitter confessed in a press conference.
Which most people would consider more proof than a conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Rangel was found guilty by the House Ethics Committee
and he paid back the taxes he cheated on. Which most people would consider more proof than a conviction. Clinton admitted smoking weed. Should he have resigned for that? Again, if you want a double standard go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Meant to reply to the same post you did. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
33. Then we cannot allow Weiner to be forced to resign. Why do we allow it?
Why don't we fight against it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. "forced to resign"?
He wasn't forced by anybody but himself. Lots of people thought it was a good idea, but in the end, it was his choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Are Democrats expected
Edited on Fri Jun-17-11 10:04 AM by polmaven
to base their actions on the way the GOP does things? Because THEY didn't ask Vitter to resign that makes it ok, so the Dems should just do the same thing?

Huh????? Seriously???? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harmony Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. The pressure applied against Vitter compared to Weiner
is night and day by the Democrats. This definitely isn't their brightest moment as a party IMVHO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. The post to which I responded
specifically noted that Vitter wasn't asked to resign by the GOP. My own opinion is that what we do in these situations should not be based on what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
34. First off, I don't consider what he did to be bad. For bad, see anything the GOP does.
As for resigning for showing his muscles to some unknown woman who was soliciting him to do precisely that. How on earth does that influence his politics? No wonder European consider us wackos. We've gotten very 'REPUBLICAN' in our false morality, but don't even defend our own when the time comes. Did we want Clinton impeached for the cigar and the stained dress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
23. It'll be over by Monday. The public is tired of the story
A poll showed 60+ percent were tired of it. They should have moved faster to get the interviews. And Weiner probably could have survived had he stuck it out, but I'm guessing Huma asked him to resign for the sake of their family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. The public was tired of the story long before the resignation was forced.
So what did the resignation do? Put it back into the headlines. Go team!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. It probably did put it back into the headlines, but you need to
place the blame where it belongs: Solely on Weiner. He did what he did, and then he chose to resign on his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. No, he did what he did
Then the leadership called for him to resign, which brought the story back up.

Then he resisted the calls to resign, which brought the story back up.

Then the leadership kept calling for him to resign, every single day, early in the morning so it dominates the news cycle.

Then he resigned.

Weiner was dumb. The leadership has been #*$&*# morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
24. I know! I saw this, too! It's not going away because the Corporate Media
doesn't want to focus on how the ReTHUGlicans are destroying this country, especially at the STATE LEVEL!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
27. Who cares? Our country's "news" outlets are a collective joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. Talking about the situation keeps it alive.
For the love of all things holy in this world: stop fucking talking about it. Otherwise, YOU are to blame! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. It doesn't seem like you want it to go away either (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
40. You only post negative stories
about Democrats. Can't help but wonder why that is and whether you take medication for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
48. This appears to be the only post discussing Weiner..
if not for you it probably would go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
50. FYI... there was no mention of Wiener on both of the Sunday morning talk shows I watched.
Edited on Sun Jun-19-11 09:48 AM by DCBob
I suspect the opposite if Wiener had not resigned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-11 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
51. nobody gives a shit anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC