Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E.J. Dionne: Who is Obama? Now We Know

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 07:19 AM
Original message
E.J. Dionne: Who is Obama? Now We Know
Who is Obama? Now We Know
By E.J. Dionne


WASHINGTON -- Barack Obama is not the man many Americans thought he was. This sudden realization has transformed American politics.

The sheer audacity of the successful operation against Osama bin Laden has forced Obama's friends and foes alike to reassess what they make of a chief executive who defies easy categorization and reveals less about himself than politicians are typically drawn to do.

Obama is hard to understand because he is many things and not just one thing. He has now proved that he can be bold at an operational level, even as he remains cautious at a philosophical level. His proclivity to gather facts and weigh alternatives does not lead automatically, in the venerable phrase, to the paralysis of analysis. It can also end in daring action tempered by prudence -- for example, making sure that additional helicopters were available to our Navy SEALs.

The president's rhetoric has often emphasized caring, compassion and community, the language one expects from a moderately liberal politician. Yet as one of his close aides told me long ago, there is inside a very cool, tough, even hard man.
Obama is not reluctant to use American military power. He was not at all queasy about authorizing the killing of an American enemy and the disposal of the body at sea to ensure that there would be no memorial to rally bin Laden's followers.

more...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/05/who_is_obama_now_we_know_109758.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. +1
Thank you for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. k&r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now if he could just be a liberal and fight for the middle class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. you have to be a liberal to fight for the middle class? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Past precedent certainly points in that direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Those of us who supported him early on, knew he was no firebreathing "liberal".
He's a moderate, and still he won a resounding victory, which he will repeat in '12. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. +1
Its funny so many hard-core liberals thought Obama would govern as a hard-core liberal. If they listened at all to what the guy was saying it should have been obvious Barack Obama was/is a moderate... and I have no problem with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Silly reply. Look at the record, and then get a clue. Ultra left nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. I really doubt the president is assigning aircraft on military raids.
Can't we just give him the actual credit he's do and not invent shit?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Can't stand it, huh? That's what makes this victory so much more delicious.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. there you go, kickin barack and joe again with that cartoon feller! why i aughta...
Edited on Fri May-06-11 10:36 AM by dionysus
:P

and how is that guy supposed to get back up after he's done kickboxing? he ain't got no arms!!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Why do you doubt Obama's role on the helicopters?
See Michael Scherer's blog at Time Magazine:
http://swampland.time.com/2011/05/03/obama-pushed-for-fight-your-way-out-option-in-bin-laden-raid/#ixzz1LKNgqtJu

A senior U.S. military official Monday credited President Obama for having a prominent role in pushing and shaping the plan to get Osama bin Laden. “In the final weeks and really months of this, his personal interest and direction and attention pushed the case to a new level that enabled real action,” the official told reporters. “And I think that role is quite important.”

On Tuesday, White House officials began to offer more details on exactly how Obama had shaped the final assault plan. In particular, the President, they said, urged the Pentagon to revisit the number of helicopters it planned to bring into Pakistani airspace on the mission. One of those extra helicopters later played a role in the mission.

The president made his concerns known in a briefing about 10 days before the assault on the bin Laden compound. According to senior aides, Obama felt that the special operations COA, or course of action, was too risky. Under the COA at that time, only two helicopters would enter Pakistani airspace, leaving little backup if something went wrong. “I don’t want you to plan for an option that doesn’t allow you to fight your way out,” the President told operational planners at the meeting, according to the notes of one participant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R, GOBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. woo hoo! we knew all along of course nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Don't necessarily agree with the entire article
But, it's still a good read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC