|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
nmbluesky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 11:32 AM Original message |
Obama isn't alone....not invited to Royal Wedding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
1. 1 billion Chinese didn't receive invitations either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razorman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
2. Maybe I'll invite the president to go as my "plus one". Oh wait. I wasn't invited, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm sure I was invited, but lost the invitation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
4. If Obama was invited, I would hope he declined. We're not Loyalists. Fuck the Royals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. What has to happen in UK to change the Royal Stipend? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 11:13 AM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Yup yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwooldri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 08:04 AM Response to Reply #5 |
37. It is part of the constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. As it should be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. It's a security nightmare already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalEsto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. Good for Cherie Blair! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 07:06 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. You wouldn't bow because you are not British. In England it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzNick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 09:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Well, I would not bow for the royals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 11:19 AM Response to Reply #19 |
30. That's why I loved Michelle Obama when she met them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 11:18 AM Response to Reply #12 |
29. You admire polo loving leeches? What have they done for you? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. Obama is not invited because it is not a State Wedding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 07:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. And I'm sure they'll lose sleep. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
10. Why do we hear about this wedding this much?I thought this country got its independence from England |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
11. Why should they invite anyone they don't want to their wedding? Blair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. He should crash the wedding. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
15. What a relief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
16. I hear no heads of state were invited... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 09:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I heard on MSNBC that it's also a matter of security. It would be nearly impossible to have all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 09:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. "Fact Check" has the answer. It's not what you say about security. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 10:07 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Link is outdated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. Link works for me and the information is current. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Then you're confused and reading a different link.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 06:57 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. NOPE...Clicking that link leads to what I posted about...It must be YOU who has problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 08:17 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Your link is outdated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. AHAH!! Gotcha...you were "pumping your post" saying that MY Link Doesn't Work! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 08:15 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. When did I say your link didn't work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
evilkumquat (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
21. Didn't we fight a war a couple hundred years ago... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vicar In A Tutu (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 05:50 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. As a British citizen, I take offence to that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 11:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. A dude...no point in saying that---we got the same problem in America and all over the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GomezLives (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-24-11 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
22. F the Queen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capt. America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
24. It is their wedding, they should be able to invite or not-invite whomever they want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheel_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
26. Is anyone really concerned about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JayceR (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-25-11 04:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Sadly Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
olegramps (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-27-11 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
38. I remember one wit in Parliament who remarked regarding the birth of a prince or whatever: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC