Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Weeding out the Bushies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:11 PM
Original message
Weeding out the Bushies

Obama Admin. Cracks Down On Burrowing -- Right Cries Foul

Zachary Roth

In what may be another small dose of that precious change we can believe in, the Obama administration is taking steps to crack down on one of the Bushies' favored tactics for politicizing government: burrowing.

In the waning days of the Bush administration, we told you about some political appointees who had landed career jobs, with civil-service protections, at their departments -- allowing them to continue to exert influence under the new government, and making them difficult to remove. In fact, the Bushies were far from the first group to try this. The Washington Monthly's Charles Peters, who has chronicled the workings of the federal government since the 1960s, used to call it the "headless nail" phenomenon.

But now the Obama administration is trying to at least make it more difficult. A recent memo from John Berry, director of the Office of Personnel Management, announced that starting January 1, his office will have to sign off every time a political appointee who was appointed during the last 5 years is hired for a career position. Right now, OPM approval is only required during a presidential election year.

Berry wrote in his memo that political appointees can't be excluded from consideration for career jobs, but they also "must not be given preference or special advantages" -- as appears to have happened in the past.

Some on the right have sounded the alarm over Berry's memo, arguing that it unfairly discriminates against political appointees, and suggesting it's designed to weed out Bush appointees whose political outlooks differ from that of the new administration.

But two experts we spoke to dismissed those concerns. Paul Light, an expert on the federal bureaucracy at the Brookings Institution, called the new policy "not a prohibition, but tighter review."

And Bill Bransford, who as general counsel to the Senior Executives Association has studied the burrowing phenomenon, called the memo "appropriate."

In the past, Bransford told TPMmuckraker, the process has been marred by a lack of transparency from OPM. So when political appointees have been hired for career posts, there have been legitimate concerns about political interference. The new policy, he explained, begins to fix that. "Having that new level of review by OPM should give some comfort to the public that the political appointees who do receive career positions are in fact the most qualified," he said.

more





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice checkmate. Make the wingnuts cry! That's more Change We Can Believe In. nt
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Starting January 1, This will do nothing about the Bushise already infecting our government. Still
it is a good policy. What can we do about the bushrot already in place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. "every time a political appointee who was appointed during the last 5 years"
If they change jobs or get promoted it will.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Glad to revisit this subject. The DOJ needs to be cleaned out ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. yep! and the pentagon. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. and then we have burrowers like Giethner
Summers, Rubin, Gates, Jones, etc.....
Time to really clean house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank goodness 'cause it's about time.
Thanks for the follow-up to a nagging question: How and When can this be done.
KnR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did the RWers cry in 2004-5 Bush had CIA purged of ANY worker suspected of supporting Kerry?
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 01:29 PM by blm
I don't seem to recall their concern then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Is that what happened? I remember there being some big deal, but forgot about what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. You can bet your bottom dollar
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 03:02 PM by Hutzpa
that's exactly what they did, I remember folks here getting pissed over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Because we still had few in the media willing to further the story at the time.
People here forget that Keith didn't get the freer rein to express himself till Schiavo and then Katrina. And it was like a dam burst. His Special Comments only started in summer 2006. And we only just got Maddow this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Squeeze tighter
keep squeezing.....Yes!

A walk in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. KnR. Good. Let them provide a resume and take Civil Service exams like everyone else. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC