Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's call their bluff---Why not just cut $100bn in GOP districts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 11:55 AM
Original message
Let's call their bluff---Why not just cut $100bn in GOP districts?
Why not just cut $100bn in GOP districts?
by John Aravosis (DC) on 2/17/2011 11:20:00 AM

If the House Rs want to cut $100bn out of this year's budget, let them - in their own districts back home. The Rs would have us believe that this is what people voted for. Let's call their bluff, and do a little experiment to see who's right. Ds don't think that this is what people voted for, so we won't cut spending in our districts. Rs, on the other hand, will cut programs in their districts to the tune of $100bn, or more if they like. Then, at the end of the year, let's revisit whose constituents are happier. After all, if all this money is just being wasted, the Rs surely can't complain about cutting it in their own districts.

I know it sounds like a "modest proposal," but at this point, why not just give the Republicans what they want and see how their constituents like it? Call their bluff. And school the true believers, like Rand Paul, in what actually happens when you claim spending is wasted but it's really not.

Oh, and make sure you put the country on notice that if the economy slides backwards it's because of the GOP cuts.
http://www.americablog.com/2011/02/why-not-just-cut-100bn-in-gop-districts.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Awesome idea!
I wish there was a way to actually make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. the link show the increase from 2009-2010 increase for LIHEAP funds
some of the largest increases have gone to red state small government teabaggers.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x419042
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'd like to see Democrats target pork in Boehner's district.
Get on the House floor and filibuster, highlighting how much we are adding to the debt, just in his district.

That, unwanted by the military, fighter engine could be just the beginning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Works for me.
And, I live in one of the reddest of the red districts--whose #1 employer is the US Dept. of Energy. Go for it, assholes! Let these fucks who elected you experience what I did, when their boy, George, cut my job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Propose a law that says states can't receive more in federal aid than they pay in tax dollars
Now I don't expect that to pass, nor would I want it to, but perhaps it would show some states how dependent they are on blue states. Smells like socialism!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Alaska for one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Given that D.C. gets $6.64 for ever $1 collected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. And there should be a bill introduced that mandates - those reps who want to overturn
Edited on Thu Feb-17-11 01:24 PM by calimary
"Obamacare" are legally obligated to renounce their own taxpayer-paid health care coverage.

And if these republi-CON governors who want to take the meat axe to everyone's jobs, benefits, and other safety nets, they should start with THEIR OWN salaries and benefits. Has Wisconsin's governor mentioned how much of a pay cut he plans to take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-11 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. If everyone in a given district voted the same way, maybe. N.T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC