Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'A Lot of Pain': OMB Director on the President's Budget

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 10:59 AM
Original message
'A Lot of Pain': OMB Director on the President's Budget
With President Obama's new budget predicting that this year’s deficit will hit a record $1.6 trillion, OMB Director Jack Lew is admitting that we may never see the budget surpluses he left behind when last serving as budget director under Bill Clinton.

“I wish I could stand here and say that we were on the edge of a surplus. When I left my last day in office I went to Congress and testified and projected $5.6 trillion surplus for the next ten years,” Lew told me. “I came back ten years later to look at projections of over $10 trillion in debt over the next ten years. It’s enough to break your heart. It’s going to take us a lot of hard work just to get to the point where we are not adding to the debt.”

But Lew also insists that Obama’s budget will make a real difference – and cause real pain.

“What I would tell you about this budget is it has a lot of pain...it does the job, it cuts the deficit in half by the end of the president’s first term, it has $400 billion of savings which would bring spending on domestic discretionary spending down to the level it was at in the Eisenhower administration and we have made tough choices,” he said on “GMA.”

more: http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2011/02/a-lot-of-pain-office-of-management-and-budget-director-on-the-presidents-budget.html#tp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Screw you...the pain should have been applied by cancelling Bush tax cuts...
and then multiplied by higher income taxes on the uberwealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. "Should" has nothing to do with "can get passed in the House and Senate." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smashcut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Then what you're saying is Obama isn't equipped to do so.
I tend to think it's because he isn't inclined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah, he could just force the Republicans to raise taxes on the wealthy.
No problem. No such thing as an independent legislative branch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Not only that the 31 Blue Dog Dems in the House. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Actually you're ignoring that Obama doesn't control the whims of Congress.
He can try to get Congress on his side...but if they don't want to. They won't Like MOST in Congress voted against allowing the Bush tax cuts for the rich. That has NOTHING to do with Obama. That lies entirely on Congress. To suggest otherwise, which is what you're doing, is to spin history on it's head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Nope. This is what happens when Democrats don't turn up and vote.
You get a Congress full of wingnuts, Teabaggers, and Corporate Republicans and some Democrats who go along.

The question is not what Obama is and is not inclined to do. The question is why did the voters allow this to happen? Now we're stuck with what we have.

We can bitch and moan until the cows come home, but this is what you get when people don't vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. The wealthy, with their tax cuts likely assured into infinity, are pained only if they feel the pain
of those who bear the brunt of first, junior's policies, now BHO's. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chowhound Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. unless you're in the percentage that got a huge tax break
then not so much- but look out poor people that gravy train you been riding is all over.nice. (insert rolling eyes smilie here). im not sure the poor can handle anymore hope and change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. "A lot of pain" for the underpriviledged and underserved.
This is a war against the poor and the middle class and it has to stop. How they argue for these cuts after giving tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans and largest corporations is REPULSIVE and CRIMINAL... AND ANTI-DEMOCRATIC.

I want my fucking party back. These DINOs are only slightly better than republicans in the same way that shit is only slightly better than diarrhea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Pain... except for the Pentagon and the MIlitary who are getting big fat raises...
$436 Million a day for Afghanisan and Iraq... but we can't let grandma be warm in the winter.

And no talk of jobs or rebuilding this crumbling nation while they continue to ship jobs to China.

CONgress.. criminals one and all.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Actually, President Obama's budget cuts defense spending
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC