Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WEEKLY ADDRESS: “It’s Time Washington Acted as Responsibly as Our Families Do”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 03:17 PM
Original message
WEEKLY ADDRESS: “It’s Time Washington Acted as Responsibly as Our Families Do”
HOW TO USE THE WRONG COMPARISON THE RIGHT WAY....

The headline on the new White House weekly address raises a familiar refrain, which I've never liked: "It's time Washington acted as responsibly as our families do."

<...>

But in this morning's address, President Obama managed to use the comparison that rankles in a way that resonated. He noted having received a letter from Brenda Breece, a mom in Missouri who works as a special-ed teacher. Her husband worked at a local Chrysler plant for nearly 40 years, but took early retirement when the plant closed, and his pension check goes quickly.

<...>

The president explained in his address, as he prepares to release his new budget on Monday, "Families across this country understand what it takes to manage a budget. They understand what it takes to make ends meet without forgoing important investments like education. Well, it's time Washington acted as responsibly as our families do."

This is an important pitch. Next week, Republicans are going to say, "Families are cutting back in these hard times, and they expect Washington to do the same." Obama is trying to turn this around, arguing in effect, "Families are cutting in some areas, but are still investing in areas like their kids' college tuition, and there's no reason Washington shouldn't do the same."

It's a compelling way to frame the argument. Congressional Republicans think the way to prepare for the future is to scrap investments in education, infrastructure, transportation, law enforcement, medical research, and environmental protections. The White House is laying the groundwork for the defense -- some cuts make sense, cuts that forgo important investments do not.

<...>


WEEKLY ADDRESS: “It’s Time Washington Acted as Responsibly as Our Families Do”

WASHINGTON – President Obama used his weekly address to preview his budget saying that it will help the government live within its means, while still investing in the future. In addition to stripping out waste, his budget includes a freeze on annual domestic spending over the next five years—even for programs he cares deeply about—which will reduce the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade. And, it will make investments in the future, by supporting what will do the most to grow the economy in the years to come. This means investing in things like infrastructure, research, and education.

The audio and video of the address will be available online at www.whitehouse.gov at 6:00 a.m. ET, Saturday, February 12, 2011.


Remarks of President Barack Obama

As Prepared for Delivery

February 12, 2011

Washington, DC


A few months ago, I received a letter from a woman named Brenda Breece. I wanted to share her story because it speaks to what a lot of families are going through – and it offers a good example of the kind of responsibility that’s needed in Washington right now.

Brenda is a mom and a special-ed teacher from Missouri. Her husband, David, was employed at the local Chrysler plant for nearly four decades. They’ve worked hard their whole lives. But like a lot of folks, they’ve taken some hits over the past few years. When the Chrysler plant closed, David had to take early retirement. His pension helps, but it’s half of what he earned before. Meanwhile, because of budget cuts, Brenda has had to buy school supplies for her students out of her own pocket – because it’s her job and she cares about those kids.

Money has been tight, but they are doing the best they can. And like so many families, they are sacrificing what they don’t need so they can afford what really matters. This is what Brenda told me. “I feel my family is frugal,” she said. “We go to the movies…once a month, but usually we just wait for them to come out on TV… I watch the food budget… We combine trips into town use coupons … and we trim each other’s hair when we need a haircut.”

So Brenda and her husband know what they can do without. But they also know what investments are too important to sacrifice. Their daughter, Rachel, is a sophomore in college with a 4.0 grade point average. The tuition is a big expense. But it’s worth it, because it will give her the chance to achieve her dreams. In fact, Brenda is looking for a second job to ensure, as she told me, “the money is there to help Rachel with her future.”

Families across this country understand what it takes to manage a budget. They understand what it takes to make ends meet without forgoing important investments like education. Well, it’s time Washington acted as responsibly as our families do. And on Monday, I’m proposing a new budget that will help us live within our means while investing in our future.

My budget freezes annual domestic spending for the next five years – even on programs I care deeply about – which will reduce the deficit by more than $400 billion over the next decade. This freeze will bring this type of spending to its lowest level as a share of the economy since Dwight Eisenhower was president. We’ve stripped down the budget by getting rid of waste. For example, we’re getting rid of thousands of government-owned buildings that sit empty because they aren’t needed. I’ve also proposed freezing salaries for hardworking government employees, because everyone has to do their part. And I’m going to make sure politics doesn’t add to our deficit, by vetoing any bill that contains earmarks.

And yet, just as the Breece family is making difficult sacrifices while still investing in the future – by helping their daughter pay her tuition – my budget does the same. I’m proposing that we invest in what will do the most to grow the economy in the years to come. This means job-creating investments in roads, high-speed speed trains, and broadband. This means cutting-edge research that holds the promise of creating countless jobs and whole new industries, like clean energy and biotechnology. And it means improving our schools and making college more affordable – to give every young person the chance to fulfill his or her potential, and receive the job training they need to succeed. Because it would be a mistake to balance the budget by sacrificing our children’s education.

So, after a decade of rising deficits, this budget asks Washington to live within its means, while at the same time investing in our future. It cuts what we can’t afford to pay for what we cannot do without. That’s what families do in hard times. And that’s what our country has to do too.

Thank you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. No comment? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree with him. But the devil is in the details. Many would disagree...
Many would disagree about what we can and cannot do without, and what qualifies as investing in the future.

You've seen the posts decrying cuts in heating assistance to the poor. Not discontinuing them. Cutting them. Obviously those posters think that expense is necessary and/or qualifies as investing in the future. Others disagree, including Obama.

Washington will just have to cut things and block out the screams of pain, because no one, absolutely no one, is going to agree with all the cuts. But they have to be done. It sucks, because the ones receiving the benefits are not the ones who caused the recession. But taxes have to be increased, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Let me know when rich people feel some pain.
'Cuz so far, they haven't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Many of those whose heating bills are no longer covered have kids who
Edited on Sun Feb-13-11 09:57 PM by truedelphi
Are now on insurance paid for by the government according to the provisions of the Health Care "Reform" Act.

So with out heat, the kids are cold. They get pneumonia. They end up going into the hospital for life saving care that comes at an expense many times above what the payment for heating bills would be.

And so on and so on.

Obama could have done us all a favor and kept his damn campaign promises. Which involved ending the Two Unwinnable Wars. Which involved regulating the banks in such a way that we would now see job creation soaring.

But apparently the big bed he is lying in, with all those billionaires, is just too warm and cozy for him to think about leaving.

Meanwhile, the BP executives are still asking him to cuddle up. And the Monsanto executives,. And the Ultra Uber Rich, who are so deeply spooning his backside that they will not be paying the four percent more in taxes that perhaps a Grayson or Feingold would have forced them to pay.

My only hope for the Demcoratic Party at this point in time is seeing those two on the Big Ticket:


Grayson/Feingold in 2012!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'll comment. Damn right we need investment in training.
Edited on Sun Feb-13-11 02:19 AM by jtuck004
How 'bout reducing all community college tuition to 10% of what it is. Feds invest the difference.

Make it a "Special Today Only" that runs for 20 years - science, math, accounting, language, starting a small bus., maybe a few trades like welding or auto mechanics or backyard polysilicone manufacturing of photovoltaic panels. No theater classes. Do what you can online. Training, not education.

Wouldn't hurt to offer something to anyone willing to start a company, maybe free health care and $100,000/yr after the first year, for 2 years, if they hire more than 1 employee. We get more job growth out of newly started business anyway.

All that other budget-busting stuff is going to hurt real people - beyond the amoral aspect of freezing vulnerable people - but taking 400 billion out of an economy with such high unemployment, where good jobs are being replaced with those that require far less skill and pay much, much less is just a daft policy.

We need to be thinking about and implementing the size investments in this country and our people that would approach the scale of re-employing 12 million people. Screw this small stuff. It would have been easier when 8 1/2 million jobs were lost the year before and the year after Obama took office, and I think that was a terribly harmful strategic blunder, regardless of the reason.

But we are where we are, so we start from here.

But if we want some difficult sacrifices, how about some of the Republicans? We could save their salaries and use it to pay heating bills. (Now, I know what you are thinking, and that is not what I meant at all). :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Looks like Republicans finally found their candidate - woo-hoo! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Actually,
no.

He's just better at strategy than most.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC