Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What different between Bush and Obama..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
nmbluesky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 05:22 PM
Original message
What different between Bush and Obama..
Edited on Fri Feb-11-11 05:30 PM by nmbluesky
Both want seek Arab Country needs a new democracy..
opposite Country were Dictator leaders
Bush started war with Iraq and thousand and thousand killed. the old leader leave with war-torn.. and find him and hung him.. The Country of Iraq still mess up..

Obama doesn't start war with Egypt..but People of Egypt did this .. a hundred killed.. Now the old Leader leave with the peace. New democracy for Egypt. Obama support them.. Now they are celebration without war!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually the Neocons never wanted Democracy, they wanted non-stop war..
And the chaos that creates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Shoe size.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do you really think so?
If that's the case, why isn't Cairo the recipient of "Shock and Awe?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. There's different ways of looking at it.
Edited on Fri Feb-11-11 06:05 PM by dipsydoodle
Both maintained US$1.5 billion in aid to Mubarak which was principally used to keep the population under control in Egypt. There is no denying that and it is indefensible.

It doesn't mean that Cairo had to be subjected to what you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. By your own definition...
Obama is nothing like Bush. Do you honestly think Bush would have advocated for the people of Egypt? Would he have told Mubarak it was time to go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bombs vs. Words...
I think the correct choice was made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Meanwhile, Obama escalated our involvement in Afghanistan
and our people are still in Iraq -- even though we're not "officially" still in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Weak, weak, weak ...
1) Obama as a candidate said he would return to a focus on Afghanistan because Bush ignored it. He was right to do so.

2) Be honest ... how many of our people are in Iraq NOW, versus when Obama took office as compared to what Obama said he would do as a candidate. If you are honest, you would find that he has reduced our presence there EXACTLY as he said he would.

So while I agree you should feel free to stew in your own juices, in both cases, he as done EXACTLY what he said he would do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wow ... and I should take you seriously?
1) I agreed that he should refocus on Afghanistan after Bush forgot about it. I still think that was needed, while knowing that Bush's neglect may have made any improvement there futile. Obama needed to make try and fix what Bush has fucked up.

2) I enjoy how you switch topics ... in the bush tax cut, etc, etc, etc space.

As a simple example, after the Dems punted on that issue, Obama KEPT an even bigger promise, not to raise taxes on 98% of Americans. And he never promised a PO or a repeal of NAFTA ...

And ... let's take the PO farther ... he passed a bill that does not have one ...

But I hear you ... no progress is better that some progress.

If he followed your advice, he'd have made no progress and I get the sense you would lead the charge to crucify him for making no progress too.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. "Obama never promised a PO or a repeal of NAFTA"
Edited on Fri Feb-11-11 07:32 PM by brentspeak


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/weekinreview/12cooper.html

“I would immediately call the president of Mexico, the president of Canada, to try to amend Nafta because I think that we can get labor agreements in that agreement right now,” said Senator Barack Obama (saying what he would do once he was elected President).


No one except you said anything about Obama "repealing" NAFTA. Responding to someone by putting a phony question/comment in the other person's mouth and then responding to that made-up question/comment to make oneself appear as "being right" is a classic bogus debating device when one has absolutely no idea what they're talking about.



Any time you want to stop embarrassing yourself, feel free to do so. I'm still laughing over your use of the word "refocus" to spin a gigantically chaotic escalation that, by all accounts, hasn't done much in the way of getting rid of either al Queda or the Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Less soldiers and many more mercs. Probably about a wash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Not much.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC