|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:26 PM Original message |
I Don't Hate The Rich. I Don't Want To Confiscate Their Wealth, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. A sane mechanism to fund the government and promote the general welfare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I Think There Is An Element Of Hate Among Some When The "Rich" Are Discussed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Deleted message |
duhneece (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
golfguru (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. The tax rate should be based on optimum tax revenue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cosmocat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 04:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. 39%for the top rate worked just fine ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
duhneece (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. 91% under Eisenhower; no one called HIM a socialist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cosmocat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 03:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
30. LOL ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 07:09 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. 80-90% worked just fine during the Great Prosperity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
4. I do, I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheilaT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. We had probably the greatest economic growth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 07:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. But in the '50s most of the world was in ruins |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fool Count (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
10. Well, then don't come for your share when we do confiscate their wealth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Don't hold your breath. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 07:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Not if there's Class Consciousness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
11. We need to target not just the rich but the super wealthy. For 30 years they've got a free ride |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike 03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
12. What is wrong with a sliding scale? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whosinpower (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
13. Confiscate ?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
15. Deleted message |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:58 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. PR firms hired by the White House and the DLC n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. You remind me of Republicans who call anyone that disagrees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
18. Deleted message |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
19. I feel the same. If we didn't need to tax anyone for anything, that'd be great... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 07:07 PM Response to Original message |
20. Why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
25. shallow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-16-10 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
26. I do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
27. What a difference a few years makes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 06:58 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Thank You For Finding That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-17-10 09:11 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Ah, so you're proving how deceptive RW framing can be dangerous to our values? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC