Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post blog argues Obama to blame for Muslim smears

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 07:24 AM
Original message
Washington Post blog argues Obama to blame for Muslim smears
wapo, being discredited again, since forever. Pretty easy to see their agenda.

http://www.salon.com/news/washington_post/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/11/15/washington_post_obama_muslim_blog

Washington Post blog argues Obama to blame for Muslim smears
By Alex Pareene



Here is a very interesting and provocative column in the Washington Post about how it is Barack Obama's fault that so many people think he's a Muslim, because Obama has been "circumspect about his religion" and he refuses to release his elementary school grades. It is basically an intro to "respectable" crypto-birtherism, in which you repeat discredited conspiracy theories about the president's background while being careful to note that you totally believe him when he claims to be a Christian.

The column, by law professor Ronald Rychlak, uses a number of context-free quotes that most likely came directly from some chain e-mail. (Or World Net Daily.) He says Obama's "support for the Ground Zero Mosque also positioned him on the side of Islam." (The religion of a billion people has "a side" and it is in apparent opposition to the "side" of Americans, I guess?)


Of course, this isn't a column in the print edition (that's still reserved for torture apologists and run-of-the-mill liars). This little disquisition on Obama's Otherness was posted as part of the Post's "On Faith" project, an online-only experiment in giving Sally Quinn, wife of Post "vice president-at-large" Ben Bradlee, something to do with her time.

snip//

Here's the conclusion of Rychlak's piece:

Let's be clear: One cannot see into the heart of another, and we must respect and accept the president's claim to be a fully believing Christian. It is unfortunate that he has had to face so many crazy theories, beliefs, and downright falsehoods. On the other hand, his demeanor and his approach to religion is the cause of most of the problems.


While I take Rychlak at his word that he's not a Nazi pedophile, it is totally understandable that so many people would come to a different conclusion, what with his obsession with clearing the name of Pope Pius XII, and his mustache.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I had two more emails bemoaning the Muslim takeover of the U.S. today.
I've quit arguing or becoming angry at the willful ignorance.

My reply to "Islam: for those of us who are not familiar with it -AN EYE OPENER..."

"But wouldn't it just be easier to live under an all-in-one system?

I welcome our Muslim overlords and suggest you get with the program.

I'm studying the Koran in my free time. You should too."

and to "Cultural Invasion"

"It's already done, they just haven't begun to exert their control over U.S..

All our babies will be named Mohammed."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-16-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. One must be inspired by the comments.
Edited on Tue Nov-16-10 08:38 AM by 5X
At least the readers have some sense.

edit to add: comments section of the washington post blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC