Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I predict that the President will go to Pittsburgh in the final weekend of the election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 09:56 AM
Original message
I predict that the President will go to Pittsburgh in the final weekend of the election
The WH announced that President Obama is keeping his schedule for the final weekend of the campaign open so that he can go to various places for GOTV rallies. I believe that given that the Pennsylvania senate AND governor's races are now tightening that Obama will make a trip to Pittsburgh, since he was just in Philly a couple of weeks ago. Pittsburgh is also the home base of Governor candidate Dan Onorato. If Dems can get big turnouts in Philly and Pittsburgh, I believe they can win the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. That is a distinct possibility.
While we are prognosticating, I predict Bill Clinton will come to Cleveland. He's more popular here than the POTUS is right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. fortunately he can hit both
since it's only about an hour plane ride.

Personally, the dems are in a good spot, imo, with Onarato coming from Western PA and Sestak from the eastern part. Both Philly and Pittsburgh could turn out big vote counts as the bases for both candidates cover the largest populations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Philadelphia is way more important that Pittsburgh
Edited on Fri Oct-22-10 10:07 AM by LynneSin
Philadelphia is 5 times larger than the city of Pittsburgh and has a great impact on the outcome of the election. As it has been said before - you get 400k voters out to the polls in Philadelphia you win the state. BTW 400k voters from Philly is more than the total population of Pittsburgh (which is 300k).

Not only that, the surrounding 4 counties of Philly (Delaware, Chester, Montgomery and Bucks) have large population centers filled with moderate and independant voters we need to sway our side. Leave Allegheny County and you get into some red zones that aren't Obama friendly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. they both are important--but certainly Philly is larger
but the Dems have to do well in the western part of the state as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette endorses Joe Sestak!
We began this week on a good note … we received the endorsement of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (the second largest newspaper in the state; its circulation territory covering approximately 38% of the electorate).

Because the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette said it so well … the choice that is at stake in this election … we present its endorsement in its entirety (and ask you to please read it, in its entirety).

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - Sestak for Senate: He's the voice of reason in a season of anger
Pennsylvanians are not likely to find a more high-contrast choice Nov. 2 than in the race for U.S. Senate. Republican Pat Toomey and Democrat Joe Sestak are vying for the seat held by Arlen Specter for the last 30 years.

Mr. Toomey wants to reduce the role of government on virtually every front. Mr. Sestak believes government should play a role in improving the lives of Americans. Based on interviews with both candidates, the choice for the Post-Gazette is easy.

In a nation with double-digit unemployment, businesses shipping jobs overseas, a health reform targeted for repeal by special interests, a Congress incapable of forging smart energy policy and a tax-cut extension that could shower billions of dollars on the rich when the deficit can ill afford it -- Joe Sestak is the voice of reason.

A two-term congressman from Delaware County, Mr. Sestak, 58, had a 31-year Navy career, which peaked at the rank of three-star vice admiral as he commanded an aircraft carrier group during combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. His service gives him insight, beyond his work on Capitol Hill, to the complex machinery of government and the pressures by powerful forces not allied with the public interest. When Mr. Sestak tells of the need to wrap up the U.S. role in Afghanistan, he speaks from the perspective of a warrior opposing the terror threat in Pakistan. When he calls for a rollback in military spending, he does so as a former commander who knows which systems work and which don't.

After his 4-year-old daughter was diagnosed with brain cancer (she is 9 now and in remission), Mr. Sestak realized the life-or-death value of good health care. The experience later made him an ally with President Barack Obama in the fight to improve Americans' access to health insurance. While he acknowledges that the reform is not perfect, the congressman deserves credit for working to abolish egregious insurance industry practices that hurt average Americans: losing coverage due to a pre-existing condition, seeing young adults kicked off their parents' policies and having benefits disappear upon reaching lifetime caps.

Joe Sestak supports a smart energy policy that will rely less on fossil fuels, create jobs by growing sustainable technologies and reduce oil imports, thereby enhancing security. While his opponent rails about the federal deficit, Mr. Sestak would help reduce the red ink by extending the Bush-era tax cuts only to households with up to $250,000 in income. Renewing tax cuts to the rich would add $700 billion to the deficit over the next 10 years.

That's understandable from Pat Toomey's point of view. While one of his TV ads highlights a family restaurant business in Allentown, Pa., he was a currency trader on Wall Street, first at Chemical Bank, then for the British investment banking firm Morgan Grenfell. Later, he was a consultant in Hong Kong before returning to the United States and moving to Pennsylvania.

In 1998 he won a seat in the U.S. House and served for three terms. Then, as now, he supported privatizing parts of Social Security, a flat income tax of 17 percent and corporate taxes that are as low as possible. He believes the new health insurance law should be repealed and replaced by a modest program of tort reform, competition among insurance companies and health savings accounts in which families would set aside tax-deductible dollars to pay for their insurance.

Mr. Toomey, 48, criticizes the federal banking bailout and economic stimulus as unnecessary spending, although economists widely backed both as necessary to save the nation from a depression. A former president of the Club for Growth, a far-right national political advocacy group, he believes in free trade and corporations unfettered by regulations. Mr. Toomey opposed cap and trade, the market-based concept initiated by Republicans that would give financial incentives to businesses for curbing harmful emissions. He says that while data supports the phenomenon of global warming, the extent to which it can be blamed on human activity is "very much disputed."

Yet Mr. Toomey, the father of three, is a soft-spoken, amiable candidate. He lacks the bark of a Rick Santorum, but he would easily replicate the former senator's voting record. An analysis last May by Pollster.com said Mr. Toomey was more conservative than 98 percent of all members of Congress since 1995 -- and much more conservative than Mr. Santorum. Which raises the question, do Pennsylvanians really want to turn back the clock?

With Joe Sestak on the ballot, voters don't have to. His views are in sync with the state and his voice calls for moderation. For that reason, he has earned the Post-Gazette endorsement.”

With 11 days to go … we're finishing strong. Our views are in sync with the state.

Neither Pennsylvania, nor the nation, can afford an extremist like Congressman Toomey who is more conservative than 98% of all members of Congress since 1995.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cognitive_Resonance Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-22-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. I predict he'll be in PA, WI and IL next weekend.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC