|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
oberliner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 05:52 AM Original message |
Would President Obama Be Better Off If Democrats Lose Control of Congress? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pstokely (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:00 AM Response to Original message |
1. maybe, maybe not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
2. That's the thinking when examining 1996 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:29 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Respectfully, That's Historically Incorrect And We Believe The Incorrect Version At Our Peril |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:40 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. I believe I stated that I don't think that 2012 will be like 1996 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 06:06 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. With An Economy Like Clinton Had His Back And His Campaign Skills He Would Have Beat Any Republicant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:09 AM Response to Original message |
3. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cosmocat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 07:10 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. It would be an fin first rate disaster ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geckosfeet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 06:44 AM Response to Original message |
5. Would we better off? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 08:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. That is a different question though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
8. ...he'd be a lame duck which the Republicans want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. It depends on how salient Republican control of Congress is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-22-10 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. Hard for him to run for re-election when he's fighting subpoena after subpoena... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
12. if the House is lost... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeanpalmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 02:21 AM Response to Original message |
13. Yes, that's the strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 02:25 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Yes, I'm sure he can't wait for the impeachment witchhunts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 08:25 AM Response to Original message |
16. Wrong question: Question is would we be better off? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
17. He would but WE won't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
18. Nope. They'll impeach him and it will be really bad for achieving any goals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. Who cares? Our voting decision should be based on what's better for US, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oberliner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Will there be much of a difference either way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 09:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
20. NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
22. What is this: GOP messaging from the media? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Second Stone (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
23. The people won't be better off with a Republican Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hansel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
24. No, absolutely not. He and the rest of the country would be far worse off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
25. It worked for Clinton. He won by fighting them but also got limited by them too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 11:11 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. hardly. WE would not have had finance deregulation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yeshuah Ben Joseph (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-23-10 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
26. Anyone who thinks the Repuke Congress was a good thing for Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
27. Good grief. Hell no! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-24-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
28. Yeah, endless investigations and impeachment hearings will definitely be good for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joe black (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
30. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
32. I sure as hell won't be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-25-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
33. sure..let's relive Clinton's second term.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC