Damn good question

[babylonsister]

* Damn good question from Markos Moulitsas: Why are liberal writers spilling more ink on one Jack Conway ad than on the multimillion dollar Chamber/Rove ad campaign attacking Dems across the country?

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/10/19/911707/-KY-Sen:-Aqua-Buddha-victim-says-Jack-Conway-ad-is-legit-and-accurate


While the usual liberal weenies get the vapors, fact is Jack Conway's ad on Rand Paul's religious past is accurate.

snip//

This race is closing, even Rasmussen sees serious tightening, and in a tough year, we can pull out a victory in crimson red Kentucky. Yet here we are wasting time and energy defending Jack Conway from liberals getting the vapors over a campaign ad that is factually true. There has probably been more liberal ink spilled on this single ad, than in all the falsehoods in Karl Rove's bullshit ads.

more...

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/10/19/911707/-KY-Sen:-Aqua-Buddha-victim-says-Jack-Conway-ad-is-legit-and-accurate

[Kdillard]

1. Sad isn't it.

[ProSense]

2. Democrats seem to have a problem going after the GOP

How many times has it been said that the Democrats need to go after the GOP?

When they do, people suddenly get shy.

[Atticus]

3. Is it that difficult to evaluate what was said instead of what THEY might SAY was said or intended?

Where is Paul's specific denial of the facts alleged in Conway's ad?

That little detail seems to have evaded political "minds" like Chris Mathews.

[Atticus]

4. Is it that difficult to evaluate what was said instead of what THEY might SAY was said or intended?

Where is Paul's specific denial of the facts alleged in Conway's ad?

That little detail seems to have evaded political "minds" like Chris Matthews.