Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beinart: Exit Rahm. Left Turn Ahead.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:09 AM
Original message
Beinart: Exit Rahm. Left Turn Ahead.
Exit Rahm. Left Turn Ahead.

With his liberal-baiting chief of staff leaving, Obama could copy Clinton and govern from the center. Peter Beinart on why he’s more likely to revive his 2008 lefty mojo and bash the GOP.

Rahm Emanuel's exit from the White House, to be formally announced Friday after two momentous years, brings the Obama presidency to a critical crossroads.
“Obama May Have to Triangulate Like Clinton If His Party Loses U.S. House,” announced a headline last week on Bloomberg.com. Expect to hear a lot of this between now and 2011, and don’t pay it much heed. It’s unlikely Obama will respond to Democratic losses by triangulating. More likely, he’ll go left.



When presidents get into trouble, they often try to recapture the magic that got them elected in the first place. For Clinton, that meant distancing himself from the left. He began his presidential bid, let’s remember, as head of the Democratic Leadership Council, a group that spent the late 1980s and early 1990s at war with the party’s liberal base. And while he flirted with economic populism, what distinguished Clinton from prior Democratic candidates was his aggressive coopting of conservative themes. He promised to cut middle-class taxes, which was back then a transgressive thing for a Democrat to do; he promised to “end welfare as we know it”; he attacked President George H.W. Bush from the right on China and Bosnia; he said abortion should be “safe, legal and rare” and he flew back to Arkansas to oversee the execution of Ricky Ray Rector, a man so mentally retarded that during his last meal he asked guards to hold his pecan pie so he could eat it later.

-snip-
So it’s not surprising that when Republicans clobbered him in the 1994 midterm elections, Clinton decided that his mistake was that he hadn’t governed like he had campaigned. He brought in Dick Morris, who had helped him move right in Arkansas after losing his first reelection bid as governor, and Morris engineered the triangulation strategy, which was largely a return to the DLC agenda on which Clinton had campaigned in the first place.

For Obama, the pattern is largely the reverse.
He won the Democratic nomination by running against triangulation. Liberals felt they could trust him because unlike Hillary Clinton and John Edwards, he had ignored the centrist consultants who urged prominent Democrats to back the war in Iraq. (Significantly, Obama kept his distance from the DLC during his brief stint in the Senate). And the campaign really turned in his favor during an October 2007 debate in which Clinton refused to give a straight answer on driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants, thus confirming Democratic voters’ suspicions that she was too politically cautious to take a stand. To be sure, Obama emphasized his ability to bring Americans together across party lines. But unlike Clinton, he didn’t actually adopt center-right policies on cultural issues. He never engineered a Sister Souljah moment. And, unlike Clinton, he didn’t run against big government. To the contrary, he beat John McCain in part by tying him to the deregulatory policies that had caused the financial crash.

-snip-
My guess is that with powerful Clinton administration veterans like Summers and Emanuel gone, Obama will try to recapture the anti-establishment mojo he had in his 2008 campaign, and that rather than tacking right, he’ll try to reconnect with his liberal base by demonizing the newly empowered congressional Republicans. His decision to pick a fight on the Bush tax cuts and to personally attack House Republican leader John Boehner suggests that he’s seeking to shape the coming partisan brawl, not avoid it. That shouldn’t come as a surprise. Barack Obama has no Dick Morris in his past, and his longtime advisers from Chicago, David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett, whose influence will only grow with Emanuel and Summers gone, have nothing like Morris’ ideological ambidexterity.
Fundamentally, Bill Clinton triangulated after the 1994 midterms because he believed America was a center-right nation. I don’t think Barack Obama believes that, which is why he won’t triangulate. By the fall of 2012, we should know if he was right.


http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-10-01/after-rahm-emanuel-leaves-obama-will-move-to-the-left/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. It'd be nice, but it's not going to happen....
He didn't "go left" after winning the White House by a large margin, with larger majorities in the house and Senate than any party has enjoyed in quite some time, and on issues that most people agreed with the liberal point of view (Financial regulation, Healthcare, etc.).

So why would anyone think that midterm loses would make him go left?

Again, it would be nice but anyone holding their breath for it is incredibly naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obama isn't governing by asking himself "is this left enough?" or "is this centrist enough?".
He is governing by asking himself "is this possible and does it make a difference?". You can debate whether or not he is answering the latter part of that question correctly, but please, lets just stop it with the "pin the ideology on the President" garbage. This guy doesn't work that way and I'm glad for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well said nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Amen and anybody expecting something else is going to be sorely disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. "pin the ideology on the President" garbage
Your expression should become part of the political parlance. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. I know
too bad nobody told LBJ that :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Being "Left" means wanting the suffering to stop.
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 11:03 AM by FredStembottom
I want jobs for Americans. Health coverage for my loved-ones. An end to illegal wars that kill hundreds of thousands. And on and on.

We now know conclusively what being "Right" brings. Death, destruction, collusion, economic stratification, religeous wars and on and on and on.

This isn't fashion. Or Rock and Roll. Or football.

This is a fight to end all the suffering.

We want the things that end the suffering.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Wow, I totally wasn't buying it until you put in an angry smiley with flames shooting off its face.
That just totally convinced me to take you seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. The smiley was for me.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. The problem is that Obama ran on two big themes:
1) transformative change; and

2) bringing the nation together and ending the vicious partisan rancor

Those two themes are mutually exclusive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. What if number 2 is what was meant by number 1?
Accomplishing the second leads to the first, because then the opposition party won't be filibustering and blocking every freaking thing the President wants to do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. sure, and our addiction to oil would end if we could sprout wings and fly.
The reactionary right are who they are. They are not capable of good faith cooperation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Obama should have someone call Howard Dean
and ask him to come to the White House and give him a job...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Howard Dean is a flake. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. America is not 100% left nor 100% right---to demand a President to be 100% is absurd.
There are fundamental differences but there are bridges for both and the President is the one who has to build the bridge...not live on one side of the town but try to run two sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Oh for cryin' out loud....
Nobody is demanding 100% of anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Actually by implying he's making a left turn and "running from the centrists"
would imply that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. That doesn't make sense.
Par for the course, I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I don't know how that doesn't make sense...but it's whatever. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. There's no 100% in that either.
He could merely go "5%" away from "the centrists".

And maybe you are much younger than me.... but today's "centrist" is just a right-wing republican of yesterday. The media just labels these wingers "centrists" to give them cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's a beautiful dream!
No doubt about that.

My "hope" will take it one tiny, step at a time.

Step 1) If I spot Rham Emmanuel actually leaving the White House (I need to see actual video footage of this still only speculative event - my "hope" is in the ICU right now)..... If he actually drives away with cleaning ladies and doormen waving in the background, I will hoist a gluten-free beer to the sky and down it in one gulp. I will then proceed to have a much better rest of the week.

Then..........?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
19. That's stupid. Rahm didn't set policy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. Obama may go left, but will the rest of the Democrats?
On the other hand, we won't have so many Blue Dogs pushing for Republican-lite everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. Will these bloggers and writers stop this rubbish
Give us ideas on how to improve or report facts, stop all this psycho analyzing and speculating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. Obama is a liberal. "Obama = DLC" is a lie told by whiners. No more Clintons in the WH, please.
Edited on Fri Oct-01-10 02:27 PM by ClarkUSA
Once was enough:

When presidents get into trouble, they often try to recapture the magic that got them elected in the first place. For Clinton, that meant distancing himself from the left. He began his presidential bid, let’s remember, as head of the Democratic Leadership Council, a group that spent the late 1980s and early 1990s at war with the party’s liberal base. And while he flirted with economic populism, what distinguished Clinton from prior Democratic candidates was his aggressive coopting of conservative themes. He promised to cut middle-class taxes, which was back then a transgressive thing for a Democrat to do; he promised to “end welfare as we know it”; he attacked President George H.W. Bush from the right on China and Bosnia; he said abortion should be “safe, legal and rare” and he flew back to Arkansas to oversee the execution of Ricky Ray Rector, a man so mentally retarded that during his last meal he asked guards to hold his pecan pie so he could eat it later.

-snip-

So it’s not surprising that when Republicans clobbered him in the 1994 midterm elections, Clinton decided that his mistake was that he hadn’t governed like he had campaigned. He brought in Dick Morris, who had helped him move right in Arkansas after losing his first reelection bid as governor, and Morris engineered the triangulation strategy, which was largely a return to the DLC agenda on which Clinton had campaigned in the first place.

For Obama, the pattern is largely the reverse. He won the Democratic nomination by running against triangulation. Liberals felt they could trust him because unlike Hillary Clinton and John Edwards, he had ignored the centrist consultants who urged prominent Democrats to back the war in Iraq. (Significantly, Obama kept his distance from the DLC during his brief stint in the Senate).


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=433&topic_id=462816&mesg_id=462816


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC