Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Big News from the Retail Sales Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:58 PM
Original message
The Big News from the Retail Sales Report

The Big News from the Retail Sales Report

Posted by Austan Goolsbee on November 16, 2009

The big news from the retail sales report was that sales rose again and even more than expected--1.4%, which was a full half point more than the consensus forecast.

The core retail spending--the stuff that tends to give a steadier picture and not fluctuate around a lot--rose for the third straight month. And if you compared the core sales in October 2009 to October last year, it was the first year-over-year increase in 8 months. In fact, the three-month gain ending in October was the strongest since June 2008.

This string of gains means that consumer spending is on track to post another gain in the fourth quarter of the year. From mid 2007 to mid 2009, we had measly growth or outright declines in consumer spending so this is a welcome sign of the beginnings of recovery.

One last thing worth noting in this retail sales report is the fact that consumer spending on motor vehicles posted a big increase. The report last month showed a decline in sales as the Cash-for-Clunkers program ended. Some critics argued that the perceived recovery of the economy was only a temporary blip due to people shifting their car purchases forward and sales now would be lower for an extended period. These data suggest that didn't happen. They confirm what the private industry sales data already documented. The sales of motor vehicles in October are up to an annual rate that actually exceeds the rate in the eight months before cash-for-clunkers began.

The President's focus is on recovery and getting people back to work. Turning the economy around is the necessary first step for job creation. This report suggests the recovery effort may be picking up steam.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah and there was also this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That really doesn't negate the point in the OP. Also
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 09:13 PM by ProSense
sputter isn't negative.

The Empire State Manufacturing Survey indicates that conditions for New York manufacturers improved in November, but at a somewhat slower pace than in October. The general business conditions index fell 11 points, to 23.5. The indexes for new orders and shipments posted similar declines. Pricing pressures eased, with the prices paid index positive but lower than last month and the prices received index rising to a level just below zero. Employment indexes fell from October’s elevated levels, remaining slightly positive. Future indexes conveyed an expectation that activity and employment would improve in the months ahead and that both input and selling prices would increase significantly.


Pulling out the inconsistencies doesn't mean there aren't positive signs.

From the horses mouth, Bernanke:

The Outlook for the Economy and Policy

I return now to the outlook for the economy and policy. As I noted, I expect moderate economic growth to continue next year. Final demand shows signs of strengthening, supported by the broad improvement in financial conditions. Additionally, the beneficial influence of the inventory cycle on production should continue for somewhat longer. Housing faces important problems, including continuing high foreclosure rates, but residential investment should become a small positive for growth next year rather than a significant drag, as has been the case for the past several years. Prospects for nonresidential construction are poor, however, given weak fundamentals and tight financing conditions.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Fed will present facts but you have to get through their double speak
The key in that article, because you know nothing about business or economics was the cash holding positions. Now re-read it and tell me what you think the consequences of that paragraph is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "As I noted, I expect moderate economic growth to continue next year. "
I know what that means.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Fed double speak
Re-Read the cash survey position. Prove to me you have intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Hate to tell you this Jake.....
... but whatever point you're trying to make is getting lost because of the personal insults.

You're a good guy. You're better than that. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I should be nicer to Pro
but it is really really hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. No, it's supereasy........
..... she's a good Democrat. You're a good Democrat. Any good Democrat deserves respect.*

Reading/engaging in a good old fashioned policy debate is fun. I try to save the insults for the Freepers though. :)



**Does not apply to any Blue Dog member of Congress who has yet to agree to vote for HCR, see a separate thread I'll start later detailing my plans to burn them in effigy. (har har)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. i read it and its clearly positive
If your trying to suggest that increased cash holdings and decreased debt are bad signs then i would say that it is you who has again become easily confused. I know you will make the simplistic point that not spending hurts the economy and shows a lack of confidence.
But you will be mis-interpreting the data.

When companies during a recession experience a better than expected increase in cash holdings and a reduction in debt, it shows that business is picking up. At some point, those increased reserves will result in investment which will equal jobs. Companies don't spend during a recession until they feel confident that the bottom has been hit. Increases in cash reserves are one to build confidence that the bottom is past.

You essentially made his point for him. Nice work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. That may be the next step
but if in 2010 they are still holding cash, unemployment remedies aren't coming in 2010. Therefore Businesses don't buy the recession is over argument that is being sold to them yet.

This isn't a better than expected. The survey says they have more cash on hand, and they plan to have more cash on hand in 2010. How they got to that position could be a numerous number of factors but the best logical assumption is that those numbers were reached in cost cutting, the biggest cost cutting occurring in payroll because it is the easiest way to cut cost and have an immediate short term gain.

If they are planning on increasing their cash position in 2010 that means they are not planning on doing extensive hiring, because that is where the building cash is happening and that will not happen to the demand curve absolutely requires it to.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'll spell it out for you
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 09:26 PM by AllentownJake
Businesses are holding onto more cash and expect to in 2010. They also plan to take less credit.

The goal of a Treasury department of a corporation is to hold onto as little cash as possible because cash provides a poor return on investment (negative due to inflation). If businesses are planning to hold more cash that means they plan to due less investing activities (i.e. building, hiring, increasing inventory and production). If they plan to take less credit it means they plan to do less expansion.

So if you have any understanding of the business world, when you read a survey like that, you read that business is bearish on an economic recovery.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Businesses are holding onto more cash and expect to in 2010. They also plan to take less credit."
Do you just go about making up stuff?

Other factors will affect near-term employment growth as well. Business confidence in the durability of the expansion, for example, will help determine employers' willingness to hire. The current prevalence of part-time work and short workweeks may slow job creation early in the recovery period, as employers may prefer to convert workers from part-time to full-time status and to add overtime work before turning to new hires. In addition, difficulties in obtaining credit could hinder the expansion of small and medium-sized businesses and prevent the formation of new businesses. Because smaller businesses account for a significant portion of net employment gains during recoveries, limited credit could hinder job growth. Overall, a number of factors suggest that employment gains may be modest during the early stages of the expansion.


Everyone is trying to get the banks to make more loans, expand credit. Business are not turning down credit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. This is what I'm talking about
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 09:40 PM by AllentownJake
In a series of supplementary questions (see Supplemental Reports tab), respondents were asked about their cash holdings and debt financing. More than 40 percent of manufacturers expected cash holdings to increase over the next year, while 24 percent expected them to decline—in sharp contrast to results from an identical survey conducted a year ago, when more manufacturers had expected cash holdings to decline than to rise. Respondents were also asked about expected changes in their outstanding debt; in the current survey, 39 percent of manufacturers said that they anticipated declines, while just 16 percent expected increases—again, a noteworthy change from last year’s survey, when nearly as many respondents had anticipated increases as decreases in debt. In response to a related question on current cash holdings, 34 percent of firms said that they were currently holding higher than usual (excess) cash balances, up from 20 percent in the November 2008 survey.

You are looking at something entirely different.

Typical Prosense fail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. How did you get business plan to take less credit from this
Respondents were also asked about expected changes in their outstanding debt; in the current survey, 39 percent of manufacturers said that they anticipated declines, while just 16 percent expected increases—again, a noteworthy change from last year’s survey when nearly as many respondents had anticipated increases as decreases in debt.


This could simply mean that they don't aniticipate having access to credit since bank lending is still off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. They aren't going to be getting it either
unless it comes from the Federal Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. "unless it comes from the Federal Government."
Wait, what happened to your point that they don't want it?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I'm reading the cash hoarding as them not wanting it
which is probably true if the interest rates are wrong...of course if the federal government steps in and offers low interest guarenteed loans...people will always take that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. "which is probably true if the interest rates are wrong"
That means your argument is based on pure speculation.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Common sense
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 10:10 PM by AllentownJake
You can always get a loan...doesn't mean you will like the interest rate being offered. Everything is about risk, if you are willing to take a higher interest rate and you are a profitable business than someone will take the risk and lend to you.

Again I point to the cash example, if people are holding onto cash, that means the rate of return they expect for investing the money is lower than the rate of return they will from letting it sit in a money market or bank account and they will take the risk with inflation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Common sense?
How do you know what the rates are going to be? Yeah, if someone offers me a high interest loan, I'd turn it down, but you are guessing about rates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. What do you think banks are doing with their money?
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 10:17 PM by AllentownJake
Part of this is re-capitalization, the other part is they expect less risk overseas. Check out what Goldman is up to these days.

For the smaller boys, they are pretty much getting fucked by increased deliquencies in their bad commercial loans, which they bundled as CMBS, which means they were rated at 20% for capital ratio purposes...translation, as they go bad they make a bigger boom than a house does which is rated at 50%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. and if that is your argument you even know less about what is going on
In the commercial real estate default market, which is mostly taking out community and regional banks, the same banks small businesses rely on for expansion.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I now expect you to break out the TARP SBA loans
when the losses are projected to be double the amount that TARP can pump in

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Not sure why you're laughing when what you said doesn't make sense
One of the criticism being leveled at the Obama administration is that the efforts haven't stimulated bank lending. You think people are encouraging lending because businesses don't plan to borrow? Confidence improves when the situation improves, and borrowing will pick up when lending returns.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Not really
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 10:07 PM by AllentownJake
unless the interest rate is obscenely low, businesses generally won't take on debt unless they are sure the investing activity will be higher rate of return than the interest on the debt they are paying.

Now if there are low interest loans out there with federal guarantees, that will encourage lending because the rate of return doesn't need to be that high to justify the loan.

Cash hoarding is going on, which makes the assumption that the presumed rate of return is quite low (i.e. they are willing to risk low interest returns in a money market account or business bank account).

You offer a low enough interest rate, people will start to bite....banks will lend with guarantees, but you risk bubbles in that circumstance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Bottom Line, Things Are Slowly Returning To Normal
Compared to last year at this time, everyone was expecting a complete economic meltdown. Today, businesses are hesitantly returning to normal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. your assumption abou corporate "Treasury departments" is incorrect
its that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Really
because every Treasury department I've worked with over 7 years has tried to maintain the least amount of cash they possibly could to provide liquidity for the business and at the same time provide investment money for expansion or investing.

The goal is to get the most you can out of the cash you have on hand. If you are holding onto more cash, you aren't investing it and you must be doing that for a reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. It sounds like the White House link in the OP put the best spin possible on a drab situation
And Pro Sense needs to put the actual link, untitled, into her OP so everyone can know where it is coming from immediately, without having to link. As soon as I found out her "good news" came from the White House, I realized it was spin. Nothing wrong with spin--politics relies on it. But money decisions need to be based on something more solid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. unless its a recession
in which case you elevate the concept that cash is lifeblood since credit is not available. IN these cases, you store cash until its safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. .
Edited on Tue Nov-17-09 11:08 AM by Teaser
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well, I like
your news, Pro Sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. DU:GDP where good news goes to kick the shit kicked out of it and left to die
:crazy:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our fourth quarter 2009 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garam_Masala Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
34. Then there is this article on "recovery"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. Unrec. Hiding the whitehouse.gov link doesn't make the article any less spin
But it does make me doubt your honesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Clue: "Austan Goolsbee"
It's surprising that you were able to find the WH link in the OP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC