Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Telling Change of Tune

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 05:36 PM
Original message
A Telling Change of Tune
Edited on Tue Aug-17-10 05:37 PM by babylonsister
http://www.polising.com/2010/08/telling-change-of-tune.html

A Telling Change of Tune
Jonathan Singer


As conservatives delight in the debate over the placement of an Islamic cultural center in lower Manhattan, listen to what they aren't saying as much as you listen to what they are saying. For all of the over-the-top rhetoric -- and there is a great deal of it -- the implicit admission of this effort to score political points on the issue of terror speaks loudly.

While the right talks terror, they're not talking the economy. Common wisdom would hold that at a time of high unemployment, high deficits and low consumer confidence, the party out of power should be able to clean up on the issue of the economy (think 1992, 1982, and 1958; or 1932, for that matter).

The problem is, though, that for all the economic woes facing the country, the issue simply has not been sufficiently potent for the GOP. Yes, Barack Obama's approval rating on the issue of the economy is in the tank, with just 38 percent voicing approval and a whopping 59 percent voicing disapproval, according to the latest numbers from Gallup. Yet when asked who they trust more to handle the economy, Republicans don't significantly outpace the President (besting him by a single point, 42 percent to 41 percent, according to Quinnipiac polling) and they actually trail congressional Democrats (by a 43 percent to 39 percent margin, per Time's latest polling).

The main reason for this, of course, is quite simple: George W. Bush. When asked by Quinnipiac who is to blame for the current condition of the U.S. economy overwhelmingly states Bush over Obama (53 percent to 25 percent). When asked by Pew and National Journal whether it would be better to follow the economic policies of the Bush administration or the Obama administration going forward, 46 percent backed the current President while just 29 percent backed his predecessor.

But it is not just about George W. Bush. The Republicans continue to stake out the wrong position on the economy. When CNN polled on the recent state aid package to save thousands of jobs around the country -- legislation opposed by all but two Republican Senators and all but two House Republicans -- fully 60 percent of respondents backed the bill. A mere 30 percent of Americans agree with the Republicans' stance of extending the Bush tax cuts for everyone, rather than repealing either all of the tax cuts or just those for high income earners (per Pew/National Journal polling).

With Republicans failing to capitalize on the weakness of the economy, it's little wonder the right is trying to turn the country's focus away from economics and towards terror. But considering that poll after poll this year has shown Americans care much more about the economy than about any other topic, it's far from clear to me that this change of tune is going to pay political dividends for conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. But it is frustrating to know that public opinion seems to have little influence on the
activities of Congress..or even the President. The influence seems to flow in the other direction...at least in the repuke world.

The repukes are still framing the issues, and stirring the shit, and making all the headlines.
The Democrats are STILL not showing the spine they need to do what needs to be done.

and yet again:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Did you read this? Spine is being shown, just not
necessarily reported on. It's very tiring to hear this argument when it's simply not true.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x414027

Why doesn't Obama stand up to Republicans instead of being so weak and bipartisan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thanks for that link. I had missed that post.
So the question becomes how can the Dems start to control the media, and thereby the message?

It would seem that McLuhan had it right...The Medium is the message, and vice versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Trade in Gibbs?
Seriously, I'm also coming to see that it is not so much what the Obama admin has or hasn't done up till now...it's the messaging! What happened to the oiled machine of the '08 election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Move Gibbs, he is not the guy for that gig
and get some real talent to back up the President. This lot they have in there should not be representing a second rate pop star, much less the President of the United States. I guess they all have to be straight and play basketball or something, not a great way to pick your pubic reps. Clearly, they are not hired for their excellence. They have none of that. Gibbs has had a few really good days, but not nearly enough. His support team also seems weak.
The messaging is a mess, aging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Appreciate the comments
BNW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Obama was a novelty then; now, not so much. He's
definitely a target now.


:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. KnR
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC