Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Required reading if you want to understand the Senate, and...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 06:01 AM
Original message
Required reading if you want to understand the Senate, and...
Edited on Sat Aug-07-10 06:10 AM by TreasonousBastard
how it has become one of the more useless American institutions.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/09/100809fa_fact_packer?currentPage=all


This is just one of those days when you want to throw up your hands and say, ‘What in the world are we doing?’ ” Senator Claire McCaskill, the Missouri Democrat, said.

“It’s unconscionable,” Carl Levin, the senior Democratic senator from Michigan, said. “The obstructionism has become mindless.”

<...>

Between speeches there are quorum calls, time killers in which a Senate clerk calls the roll at the rate of one name every few minutes. The press gallery, above the dais, is typically deserted, as journalists prefer to hunker down in the press lounge, surfing the Web for analysis of current Senate negotiations; television screens alert them if something of interest actually happens in the chamber. The only people who pay attention to a speech are the Senate stenographers. On this afternoon, two portly bald men in suits stood facing the speaker from a few feet away, tapping at the transcription machines, which resembled nineteenth-century cash registers, slung around their necks. The Senate chamber is an intimate room where men and women go to talk to themselves for the record.

<...>

For the next nine hours, the chamber became the stage of a theatrical whose ending, like almost everything that happens on the Senate floor, was known in advance to all. The Republican goal in Vote-O-Rama was to embarrass the Democrats while appearing to suggest useful changes; the Democratic goal was to prevent any change to the bill, so that it wouldn’t have to return to the House, where it might be voted down. Several of the Republican amendments had been designed to make Democrats look hypocritical, by forcing them to vote against policies that the Party typically supports. One amendment, for example, declared that the health-care bill could not be linked to a tax hike on individuals making less than two hundred thousand dollars a year. Other amendments were more nakedly partisan, and outlandish. David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, proposed an amendment that repealed the entire law. Senator Tom Coburn, a Republican obstetrician from Oklahoma, introduced an amendment to insure that veterans diagnosed with mental illness would not be denied the right to own firearms, and another to prevent “convicted child molesters, rapists, and sex offenders” from buying erectile-dysfunction drugs with taxpayer funds. Coburn got through the minute he was allotted to explain his Viagra amendment without cracking a smile. “This is not a game amendment,” he insisted. “It actually saves money.”

So many senators snickered that the presiding officer banged his gavel for order.

<...>

(edited spelling)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felinetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you so much. Bill Press said this was a must read. Looks depressing but I will read and
pass on to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read the whole thing.
Edited on Sun Aug-08-10 02:51 AM by AspenRose
That WAS depressing. And it pretty much confirms what we've known all along...the GOP is an obstructionist party with no solutions.

And woe to those in the GOP who even THINK about cooperation or bipartisan support.

Mitch McConnell is a dick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It was extremely depressing. And some Senators on both sides have really, really tried.
Edited on Sun Aug-08-10 09:04 AM by Jennicut
But McConnell thinks obstructionism will get the Rethugs back in power. And he may be proven right, because the public pays so little attention and the media doesn't cover any of it in a substantial way. At this point, the Senate is where a lot of good legislation goes to die. What a pathetic institution. And the constant campaigning...the Supreme Court decision only made it worse. Corporations are people I guess and money matters more then anything. I really, really get it with regards to what Obama can do. I am surprised he got done what he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-08-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. Filibuster needs to be eliminated or weakened
True it could be bad when the Rs are in power, but at least then the voters would have some consequences for their choices and they might wake up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC