Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel gives the president R-E-S-P-E-C-T! Video and transcript:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 03:25 AM
Original message
Rachel gives the president R-E-S-P-E-C-T! Video and transcript:
MADDOW: He signed a bill that gave amnesty to undocumented immigrants. He grew the size of the federal government and the budget, added a whole new cabinet level agency and added tens of thousands of government workers to the federal payroll. He tripled the deficit. He bailed out and expanded social security with a big fat tax increase. He raised corporate taxes by hundreds of billions of dollars. He raised taxes on gasoline. He, in fact, signed into law the largest tax increase in history. He supported federal handgun controls. He called for a world without nuclear weapons. He was Ronald Reagan. As a conservative saint, as the right-wing rock star, as king of the Republican prom in perpetuity, as a transformative figure for people who call themselves conservative, the facts of Ronald Reagan`s legislative record are awkward. Ronald Reagan`s record has in it a lot of things that would get him kicked out of today`s Republican Party, which is not to say that President Reagan was a secret liberal. He was not. What he was, was complex, but accomplished in his own way.

With the passage of financial regulation in Washington today, President Obama took to the very un-momentous setting of "Twitters," as he called it yesterday, to say this, quote, "Last night`s House Senate agreement on Wall Street reform represents the toughest financial reform since the Great Depression." It turns out that a lot of things that have happened in the less than two years of this administration are the biggest or first or most important in generations. On the occasion of the Wall Street reform announcement today, Taegan Goddard at " CQ Politics" wrote, "Not since FDR has a president done so much to transform this country." Even before today`s historic Wall Street reform agreement, President Obama, of course, did what politicians have been trying to do for more than 60 years. He passed health reform, which, for the first time, establishes government responsibility for the health care of American citizens.

Consider also the stimulus bill. It didn`t just throw a lasso around our entire economy and yank and yank it back from the brink. It also pumped about $100 billion into the crumbling embarrassment of our national infrastructure and transportation system. It was the largest investment in infrastructure since Ike. For solving our country`s energy problems, something Obama has compared to man walking on the moon, it contained about $60 billion in spending and tax incentives for renewable and clean energy, also a historic investment. It also included an unheralded but giant investment in science and tech, amping up the budgets at NASA, the National Science Foundation, and an experimental energy research agency that was created under President George W. Bush, but never funded until now. President Obama also expanded state kids` health insurance to cover another four million kids. He signed the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act amending the 1964 civil rights act for equal pay for equal work. He signed a nuclear arms deal with Russia that would reduce both countries` arsenals by a third. He created a new global nonproliferation initiative to keep nuclear materials out of the hands of terrorists. He set forth an international way forward on that radical left-wing proposition of Ronald Reagan, a world without nuclear weapons. Then there are the legislative and policy achievements that don`t just build on previously-set precedents, but set new ones. The Hate Crimes Prevention Act, also known as the Matthew Shepard Act. It had languished in Congress for years. The Food and Drug Administration permitted for the first time to regulate tobacco. Better late than never, he dismantled the scandal-plagued Minerals Management Service, broke it into three parts so that the folks who collect money from oil leases aren`t the same ones regulating the industry. And now, it will actually investigate the industry that it was busy schtupping and doing drugs with during the last administration.


Obama fired two wartime commanding generals in little over a year. He overhauled the astonishing stupidity of the student loan system in which banks were being subsidized to give loans that were guaranteed by the government anyway, a license to print money. That was ended in the savings put toward actual aid to students. He canceled a weapons program that was bloated, unnecessary and totally irrelevant to either of our current wars, the F-22. Why even mention the cancellation of a single weapons system? Because that never happens. Weapons systems never get canceled. The F-22 did, which is itself a miracle. In each of these achievements and in the list of things he has yet to do "Don`t Ask, Don`t Tell," closing Guantanamo in each of these things, there is room for liberal disappointment. I sing a bittersweet lullaby to the lost public option when I go to sleep at night. But presidential legacies are complex. Not even the Reagan administration`s legacy is pure as the conservative-driven snow. But Taegan Goddard at " CQ Politics" was right today about nothing this big happening since FDR. The list of legislative accomplishments of this president in half a term even before energy reform which he`s probably going to get to is, to quote the vice president, "a big freaking deal." Love this administration or hate it, this president is getting a lot done. The last time any president did this much in office, booze was illegal. If you believe in policy, if you believe in government that addresses problems, cheers to that.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#37937282

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R and thanks, Impik. I just posted the video to my facebook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Great idea! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rachel to be thrown under the leftbagger bus in.....3....2.....1....
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. No, I don't think so. She is only thrown under the bus when she holds the admin accountable
That's when you will get the throngs of "Rachel is such a purist, I can't bear to watch her show anymore", and the popular "her ratings are falling and I can see why", and of course "who even watches MSNBC anymore". The opposite faction (due to potential DU rules violations I cannot specifically name this protected faction) from the "Leftbaggers" (as you prefer to call the left) are so predictable when it comes to their reactions to Rachel, that it would be amusing if it weren't so tragically pathetic.

Long story short, sorry to burst your bubble, but us "Leftbaggers" won't be stopping by to throw Rachel under the bus. You will have to wait until the next time she calls Obama out for backtracking on a campaign pledge, or holding another backroom deal making session, and then you will get plenty of her being thrown under the bus. It just won't be by the "Leftbaggers".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Leftbaggers don't have time to throw Rachel under the bus, they're too
busy running over President Obama because he hasn't done anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Well there is something wrong with supporting the President
:sarcasm:

But nothing wrong with being loyal to Rachel. Too bad she's not President.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I agree, too bad she's not. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. What DU do you visit, not this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. The "opposite faction" has many perspectives.
Rachel's one of the few pundits whose criticism I listen to very closely, and with great respect, because she doesn't play loose with the facts, or engage in the over-amped rhetoric of bumper-sticker politics. If there were more criticism like that from *all* sides, I think we'd be better off as a discussion board, and as a country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. I think, with a few notable exceptions, most progressives know that the...
alternative is just too gruesome. There's that 10% of "liberals" for whom no elected official is good enough. They rally, instead, behind teevee & radio personalities who don't have the responsibility of actually governing. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. How are those new rules for civility working out, DUers? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. She gets beter and better
is there anybody better out there?
I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks impik!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Edited on Sat Jun-26-10 07:23 AM by redqueen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. This South African dude on CNN just said.....
... when TJ Holmes asked him who the people of South Africa were rooting for in the US game against Ghana today .... he said that while many would root for their neighbor Ghana .... "many will root for the US because we think Barack Obama is cool."

Change You Can Believe In. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. :):):)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. It was pretty clear who she was talking to . . . whiney progressives
who seem to think he hasn't done anything.

Nice job, Rachel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. hot dang. rec'd. nt. wow.
Edited on Sat Jun-26-10 02:24 PM by Whisp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. Well done, Pres. Obama, and well-reported, Rachel!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. Not a fan of Rachel, but as they say, "even a stopped clock......" Rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. You guys going to start unblocking MSNBC now? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Speaking for myself. Hell No. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. Thank you. Excellent report from Rachel.
Yes, there is room for disappointment - because there was so much to be done. But when you look at what he has accomplished, it's quite amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. Didn't Rachel just meet with Obama and a few other
Left leaning journalists under the condition that they do not discuss what happened at the meeting?

Seems noteworthy given that she usually is critical of Obama. I guess he reminded the journalists of what he is up against!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. Rachel.... I freaking love you! What an incredibly balanced, cool assessment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC