Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McChrystal firing allows Obama to reassert leadership at critical moment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:27 PM
Original message
McChrystal firing allows Obama to reassert leadership at critical moment


It's not impossible that the McChrystal crisis will turn out to have an upside for Obama. While it has obviously created a short-term political crisis, it has also given him the opportunity for a very high-profile reassertion of control at a critical moment. It's hard to imagine a single pundit on either side questioning Obama's leadership in the wake of this decision and Obama's execution of it. In short, Obama finally did kick an ass.

* It's good that Obama gave strong voice to the need to reassert civilian control over the military. McChrystal's conduct, Obama said, "undermines the civilian control of the military that is at the core of our democratic system, and it erodes the trust that's necessary for our team to work together to achieve our objectives in Afghanistan."

On one level, Obama was making it clear that this is about something larger than merely reasserting his own authority. But it was also a tacit acknowledgment that tensions between the military and civilian leadership are endangering the mission.

Obama suggested, without saying outright, that removing McChrystal would allow the healing of this rift to begin. Whether this will bring more success is an open question, but this buys Obama a bit more room to try to unify his team.

* The choice of General David Petraeus to replace McChrystal brings some continuity to what otherwise would have been a moment of potentially wrenching transition. Indeed, Obama took pains to point out that Petraeus helped design the current strategy.

The choice of Petraeus also makes it all but impossible for critics to fault his decision to remove McChrystal. And even though Obama ruled out any change in strategic direction, the Petraeus pick all but forces a lull in criticism of the war among Congressional Democrats, which was becoming a real political problem. Dems will be reluctant to keep up the criticism without giving Petraeus a chance to succeed. This buys Obama more time -- though without a change in strategy, it remains to be seen how much good this will do him in the long run.



http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/06/mcchrystal_firing_allows_obama.html#more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. it's ok there's still lots of bush retreads running the show. not to worry nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm very impressed; he made lemonade out of lemons.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yup-even among the pundits-it was unanimous that this was a stellar leadership moment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does McChrystal stay in the miltary or does he have to retire?
If he retires he would be free to say anything he wants and would probably give the administration a lot of bad press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC