Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barton's BP Apology: Revealing What the GOP Really Thinks (David Corn)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:17 AM
Original message
Barton's BP Apology: Revealing What the GOP Really Thinks (David Corn)
Barton's BP Apology: Revealing What the GOP Really Thinks

It's hard not to enjoy watching Rep. Joe Barton (R-BP) squirm. As you must know by now, the Texas GOPer put a super-sized foot in his mouth at a congressional hearing on Thursday, when he apologized to BP CEO Tony Hayward and said that he was "ashamed" of the Obama administration's effort to push the oil firm into agreeing to set up a $20 billion escrow fund that would pay out compensation claims. Within nanoseconds, Democrats were sending out press releases slamming Barton, the senior Republican on the House energy and commerce committee. This was great ammo, for the Ds pointed out that Barton could become chair of this House committee, which oversees BP actions, should the GOP gain control of the House in the fall elections. The talking point was an obvious one: do you want a BP apologist to be in charge of investigating and monitoring BP's actions in the Gulf and elsewhere?

This was an issue ready-made for the Dems to use in the 2010 congressional elections. (The attack ad virtually writes itself.) The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the party arm in charge of House elections, immediately launched Facebook ads and a petition calling on Barton to apologize. At a White House briefing, Vice President Joe Biden and press secretary Robert Gibbs blasted Barton, with Gibbs suggesting other GOPers should ask him to leave the energy and commerce committee. Toward the end of the afternoon, Barton apologized for his apology--sort of.

That won't--and shouldn't--end the matter. Because Barton had not committed a gaffe. With his initial remarks, he had merely shared with the world what he really believed. More important, he had said what other Republicans believe. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), a Tea Party darling, derided the account as a "redistribution-of-wealth fund" and "one more gateway for more government control." The Republican Study Committee, a collection of over 115 House conservatives, dubbed the fund a "Chicago-style political shakedown"--terminology Barton used during his apology to BP. Barton's quasi-retracted remark was no accident; it was the airing of strong partisan and ideological sentiments shared by his GOP comrades. They really see the Obama administration as the evildoers in its face-off with poor, transnational BP. Are they motivated by a infinite love of the marketplace and corporations or driven by a knows-no-bounds hatred of Obama? Ultimately, it doesn't matter, because they end up in the same spot: in sympathy with the biggest despoiler of the environment in US history.

Here's what Jack Kerouac called a "naked lunch" moment: when you see what's really on the tip of the fork. Barton and his colleagues were expressing the pro-corporate perspective long nurtured on the right. Look at how the Heritage Foundation's blog put it: "Joe Barton is Right." Barton, it noted,

...

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/18/bartons-bp-apology-revealing-what-the-gop-really-thinks/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. THe GOP are finding it hard to know which way to spin
Fox thinks Barton is right! LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kinda like the shooting victim apologizing to cheney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Naked Lunch
Edited on Fri Jun-18-10 06:31 AM by SpiralHawk
One of those moments when you see what's actually on the tip of the Republicon Homelander fork (forking America & Americans royally and gleefully mangling metaphors to engorge their own fatcat corporate profiteering perversities).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yet the progressives STILL won't defend Obama for this
And claim he gave BP something in return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. He gave them the opportunity to congradulate themselves.
I'd say it was a good deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. well, since it will take four years for the 20 billion to be in place, and bp STILL has the first
decision-making role on claims, I am not holding my breath.

exxon made lots of promises after the valdez, NONE of which were fulfilled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NavyMom Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. No they do not, BP nor the gov is part of the decision making on claims
an independent party led by Feinburg (?) is in charge of ALL claims and the approval of such claims. BP is responsible for depositing $5 billion dollars into the account ONLY as a down payment for this year and the next 4 years but is not locked into this time frame, they have absolutely NOTHING to do with the claims other than funding the independent commission to get the ball rolling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-20-10 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. The path is clear,
but will they take it? I think this time they will. Unlike healthcare with all its nuance, this is a white hat / black hat moment. Any doubts about who the black hats are is quickly sorted out with a few minutes of coverage from the gulf coast. The voters can quickly wrap their heads aroud this and it is easily reducible to sound bites and 30 second campaign spots.

The crisis will unfortunately, because of its nature, remain in the news most likely now all the way to the eve of the election. The table is set for some classic bare knuckle politics, the only question remaining is whether the Dems still know how to punch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC