Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clyburn Says Greene Was a "Plant," calls for investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:26 AM
Original message
Clyburn Says Greene Was a "Plant," calls for investigation
Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 11:35 AM by Ian David
Clyburn Says Greene Was a "Plant"
House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) called for an investigation into the circumstances that led to Alvin Greene (D) to win the Democratic U.S. Senate primary in South Carolina, The Hill reports.

Said Clyburn: "There were some real shenanigans going on in the South Carolina primary. I don't know if he was a Republican plant; he was someone's plant."

Meanwhile, The Root has an interview with Greene noting that he "paid $10,400 to register as a candidate and then bought not even a single campaign sign" but "stunned the pundits with his victory, and in last 20 hours, he's become a media research project."

More:
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/06/10/clyburn_says_greene_was_a_plant.html

See Also:

This is Real Fishy (Alvin Greene)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x332268

Meet Alvin Greene, South Carolina’s Democratic Candidate For Senate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x473969




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was thinking that and posted something about in another thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Never underestimate
the cunning of republicans to subvert elections and democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. ..... or of corporatist Dems in Arkansas to subvert elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. "corporatist" - I missed that word when I went to noun school. Am I an "educatist"?
Because I am certainly pro-education.

If I am pro-labor, am I a "laboratist?"

I don't get the impulse to create these crazy gooblydegook sounding words. Don't blame me too much, I was an English major.

Anyway it sounds like there was lots of outside interference in Arkansas, not just one side. But that is another there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The wonderful thing
about the English language is its ability to adapt and create new words. Check the etymology of many words that didn't exist until...they did. Many from NASA, computer terminology, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. True. The other great thing about English is its drive to simplicity.
Sure, you need a new word for "Hard Drive" or "Flash Storage". Science is always going to have a need for new terminology to describe things we never had before.

We probably don't need a new word for "Pro-Corporation" because we have that one, and the nice simple "Pro" prefix.

However, I've spent some time in Academia, so I know there is a drive to create jargon. In my day there was a huge impulse to turn every verb into a noun by adding "ification" to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. There's always..
corphead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. "Normalcy" wasn't a word until it was used in Warren Harding's campaign slogan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. It's in the OED
Under the entry for "corporatism" as the adjective form. The first use of that form of the word was in 1938.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. By Mussolini?
I know he used it as an alternative word for Fascism, though I don't know whether he coined the term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. It's cited from a source called Tablet
Used in reference to Barre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. NEVER..if you do..you're
a bloody fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. VERY VERY INTERESTING. Kick and Rec n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. The picked a "real winner" with him! Nice charges against him! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Makes it easy for a Repub or Teabagger to look like a reasonable choice
It's completely plausible that he was planted for just this reason.

Repubs sure have those cheating and lying things down pat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I had not thought of that one, ouch nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well if he was a plant it seems the rethugs would benefit from this
Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 01:08 PM by bigdarryl
wonder if DeMint knows anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Why would DeMint start knowing things NOW? He's never known anything before.
He's not a thing-knower or an it-getter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Doesn't the Democratic Party check out people that file to run for office ...
under their banner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't think anything can be done about it.
Is it illegal for a Republican to give Greene the money he needed for the filing fee? I don't think so. Plus Demint was going to win anyway no matter who the Dem nominee is. And besides, the responsibility ultimately lies with the voter to make an intelligent choice. Did the Republican's hold a gun to the heads of SC Dem voters and force them to vote for Greene? No, they voted for Greene of their own free will and the fault lies with the voters for getting us in this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. There is something wrong with it because theyve done this before and been fined for it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Can you provide a link for that please? Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Sure:
Clyburn said he did not know whether to suspect Republican involvement in the three races, but he added that Greene's candidacy reminded him of the case of GOP operative Rod Shealy.

In 1990, Shealy recruited an unemployed black fisherman facing felony charges, Benjamin Hunt Jr., to run for Congress in the Republican primary in order to boost white turnout in a different race on the ballot. Because South Carolina has open primaries, Republicans can vote for Democratic candidates and vice versa.
ad_icon

Shealy was ultimately convicted of violating campaign finance laws after it was revealed that he had paid Hunt's campaign filing fee.

"When I learned that this gentleman, Mr. Greene, was accused of a felony, I just felt this was 1990 all over again," Clyburn said.

Greene's $10,400 campaign filing fee was written on a blank check with "Alvin M. Greene for Senate" handwritten across the top.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/10/AR2010061004943.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Very interesting. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. SC has open primary n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike6640 Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. They didn't hold a gun to anyone's head
Edited on Fri Jun-11-10 09:20 AM by mike6640
They do, however, have open primaries. Republicans can vote for Democratic candidates...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Doesn't seem likely
From what I've read, other than filing as a candidate, Greene did nothing to indicate that he wanted to win the primary. No campaigning, no fund-raising, no town halls, nothing.

If he was a plant then I would expect some sort of an effort to actually win -- surely they wouldn't have expected that just being on the ballot was sufficient?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
besdayz Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. a
is this guy even competent to run for office. from his interview he's seems short a few marbles. i don't want to have a literacy test but c'mon......


just an embarassment of corruption by the sc repukes. the worst in the country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
25. Listen to him end the conversation when asked about the $10,000 filing fee:
~4:47 of this interview video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUFN7ZkjgkA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
30. Mystery in S.C.'s Democratic primary deepens
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC